|
|

|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
|
| Allan |
Aug 24 2004, 09:42 AM
Post
#1
|
|
Teenerless Weenie ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 8,373 Joined: 5-July 04 From: Western Mesopotamia Member No.: 2,304 Region Association: Southern California |
Any politicos here that can interpret this stuff? What happens now that it's been amended or if it dosn't get finalized before the Senate adjourns next month?
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/postquer...arch_type=email |
![]() ![]() |
| dmenche914 |
Aug 24 2004, 03:29 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,212 Joined: 27-February 03 From: California Member No.: 366 |
Right now, current law is 30 year rolling exemption, 1975 is considered 30 years old by the DMV, so 1975 is now exempt, next year 1976 will be exempt, and so on.
Proposed law before the recent admendment was to make the cut off for smog test fixed at 1975, all newer cars would require tests forever. Admendment would also add that any car 35 years and older if registered as a classic would only require tail pipe test, no visual test. (35 years plus require NO test under current law!) Problem is that now, all 35 year old cars are completely exempt, (actually 30 year old cars are exempt too), thus this admendment sets in motion to smog cars at least 35 years old, more likely all cars back to maybe 1965. At any rate, that would effect almost all 914's if this bill continues to change in the direction I think it might. At anyrate, it is a bad bill and must be stopped. even without the Admendment, 1976 914's would be screwed. 914's were sold 1970 thru 1976 year models. 75 and 76 models had the big rubber bumpers, earlier models did not |
Headrage Ca. Smog Law Changes Aug 24 2004, 09:42 AM
lapuwali Very, very interesting.
My read on this is that t... Aug 24 2004, 10:19 AM
dmenche914 WARNING, DANGER!
This Bill is still BULL, t... Aug 24 2004, 01:18 PM
Marty Yeoman Am I wrong or does it say:
Sec 2 Section 44011 of... Aug 24 2004, 01:46 PM
! Has to go thru BOTH houses again....my opinion the... Aug 24 2004, 02:16 PM
Headrage (6) Prior to Ja... Aug 24 2004, 03:05 PM
lapuwali I have to disagree that the admendment is worthles... Aug 24 2004, 05:06 PM
dmenche914 then again, if my car was 35 plus years old, and r... Aug 24 2004, 07:03 PM
Brad Roberts You'll love this:
BUY BOXSTERS... :D
B Aug 24 2004, 07:08 PM
dmenche914 Geer Ugh, oh well, Had to come to that, but I rat... Aug 24 2004, 07:29 PM
Cap'n Krusty "Maybe all 914's are exempt. I don't think... Aug 24 2004, 08:10 PM
elwood-914 In Amador County, we don't have manditory smog... Aug 24 2004, 10:23 PM
Headrage Additional action has occurred.
http://www.leginf... Aug 25 2004, 10:15 AM
dmenche914 Ok, back to the Assembly, where it already has pas... Aug 25 2004, 11:12 AM
mikester If I'm required to pass the tail pipe test and... Aug 25 2004, 11:56 AM
lapuwali That's the idea of dropping the visual, which ... Aug 25 2004, 12:19 PM
Cloudbuster ... Aug 25 2004, 12:45 PM
lapuwali The bill DOESN'T add '66 - '75 cars ba... Aug 25 2004, 01:09 PM
SirAndy ... Aug 25 2004, 01:22 PM
Cloudbuster ... Aug 25 2004, 02:05 PM
dmenche914 The real danger is if the 35 year classic exemptin... Aug 25 2004, 02:55 PM
lapuwali Dave, you really have to stop being so angry over ... Aug 25 2004, 04:07 PM
Headrage Another update. Don't know what it means when... Aug 26 2004, 12:46 PM
lapuwali Rule 77 (looked this up) has to do with procedures... Aug 26 2004, 01:28 PM
Headrage Anyone know how we could collectively oppose this ... Aug 26 2004, 01:31 PM
Headrage Here's another update. What the hell does all... Aug 27 2004, 10:56 AM
Headrage Sorry, was so pissed I forgot to add the link. :an... Aug 27 2004, 11:00 AM
dflesburg What do you expect from the place that made it oka... Aug 27 2004, 11:17 AM
mikester I know they are trying to get this in before the s... Aug 27 2004, 11:49 AM
fiid
Headrage Actually wouldn't it be '76 and older if i... Aug 27 2004, 12:14 PM
lapuwali Yes, but if this bill passes into law, the cutoff ... Aug 27 2004, 12:26 PM
Headrage I don't know if this is good or bad. I notice... Aug 28 2004, 09:44 PM
Headrage :bump: Aug 29 2004, 03:40 PM
dmenche914 Not a clue what that means, but there is the the A... Aug 29 2004, 04:55 PM
! It's dead....2nd year bills rarely pass..... Aug 29 2004, 05:56 PM
Brando my comment from this post on PAPBB:
California al... Aug 29 2004, 09:24 PM
! First off...MOST if not ALL of the crappy re-tread... Aug 29 2004, 09:29 PM
lapuwali ![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 24th August 2026 - 03:09 PM |
| All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
|
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |