Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Made a big mistake when adjusting valves, Time to admit it
rjames
post Nov 4 2014, 04:13 PM
Post #1


I'm made of metal
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,246
Joined: 24-July 05
From: Shoreline, WA
Member No.: 4,467
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



I copped to this in another post, but didn't mention the extent of the 'misadjusting' that I did. In short, *I think* I adjusted some or all of the valves when open. That is to say, when a valve was fully closed, I adjusted the opposite valve ala Krusty's method. No need to comment on how stupid this was, I get it and know how to tell when a valve is open vs closed now.

After the error was made, the engine was ran for ~5 minutes, at low RPMs. It has hydro lifters. Not surprising, it was noisy and had low power.
Since then I've done a proper valvue adjustment and ran it for another ~5 minutes, and it's still noisy. Not as noisy, but noisy. But with hydro lifters I'm used to noise when the car isn't driven for awhile and then it quiets down but I was afraid to run it any longer.

I plan on rechecking the valve clearance one more time before starting it up again, which I will do only because I'm at the point where I'm accepting that a rebuild is likely in my future sooner than planned.


So:
What is the likelihood I did permenant damage to something by setting valve clearance with the valves open?
My mistake resulted in a way too loose setting for some/all of the valves, so much so that the vavles may have not opened at all or opened very little when I ran it.
Given the short time I ran the engine, isn't the extent of the damage likely just to be potentially prematurely worn pushrood and lifter surfaces? And maybe there's a chance that it's noisy only because the lifters still need to do a lot of pumping up?

All of the rockers are intact (save for any cracks I can't see). All of the lifters seem to have a bit of air in them as I can compress them with the pusrhod via the rockers a bit.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
ThePaintedMan
post Nov 4 2014, 05:59 PM
Post #2


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,887
Joined: 6-September 11
From: St. Petersburg, FL
Member No.: 13,527
Region Association: South East States



Well there's your problem. You're trying to "adjust" valve lash with hydraulic lifters as if it were a stock solid lifter. You should be starting with zero lash with hydraulic lifters (i.e. no 0.006 or 0.008 gap like a stock motor). The hydraulic lifters do the adjusting for you, which is the point. You shouldn't need to adjust the lash with them installed. I have read that some manuals recommend another 1-2 turns in after you reach zero lash at TDC to preload the lifters... but I'll defer to what the Cap'n and other folks think.

Either way, I'd bet that's why it's making an awful racket.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
a few loose screws
post Nov 4 2014, 07:14 PM
Post #3


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 168
Joined: 8-August 14
From: canada
Member No.: 17,754
Region Association: None



QUOTE(ThePaintedMan @ Nov 4 2014, 03:59 PM) *

Well there's your problem. You're trying to "adjust" valve lash with hydraulic lifters as if it were a stock solid lifter. You should be starting with zero lash with hydraulic lifters (i.e. no 0.006 or 0.008 gap like a stock motor). The hydraulic lifters do the adjusting for you, which is the point. You shouldn't need to adjust the lash with them installed. I have read that some manuals recommend another 1-2 turns in after you reach zero lash at TDC to preload the lifters... but I'll defer to what the Cap'n and other folks think.

Either way, I'd bet that's why it's making an awful racket.


.006, .008, 0r 0 lash, doesn't really matter since he says he adjusted the valves with them open. Thats the real issue. I believe he was adjusting to 0 lash if I remember correctly.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
rjames
post Nov 4 2014, 11:14 PM
Post #4


I'm made of metal
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,246
Joined: 24-July 05
From: Shoreline, WA
Member No.: 4,467
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



QUOTE(a few loose screws @ Nov 4 2014, 05:14 PM) *

QUOTE(ThePaintedMan @ Nov 4 2014, 03:59 PM) *

Well there's your problem. You're trying to "adjust" valve lash with hydraulic lifters as if it were a stock solid lifter. You should be starting with zero lash with hydraulic lifters (i.e. no 0.006 or 0.008 gap like a stock motor). The hydraulic lifters do the adjusting for you, which is the point. You shouldn't need to adjust the lash with them installed. I have read that some manuals recommend another 1-2 turns in after you reach zero lash at TDC to preload the lifters... but I'll defer to what the Cap'n and other folks think.

Either way, I'd bet that's why it's making an awful racket.


.006, .008, 0r 0 lash, doesn't really matter since he says he adjusted the valves with them open. Thats the real issue. I believe he was adjusting to 0 lash if I remember correctly.



I adjusted them at 0 lash + 1.5 turns, but since the valves were open when I adjusted them the amount matters little- all that needs to be said is that they were adjusted WAY too loose.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 11th May 2025 - 08:04 AM