|
|

|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
|
| Allan |
Aug 24 2004, 09:42 AM
Post
#1
|
|
Teenerless Weenie ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 8,373 Joined: 5-July 04 From: Western Mesopotamia Member No.: 2,304 Region Association: Southern California |
Any politicos here that can interpret this stuff? What happens now that it's been amended or if it dosn't get finalized before the Senate adjourns next month?
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/postquer...arch_type=email |
![]() ![]() |
| lapuwali |
Aug 25 2004, 04:07 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Not another one! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Benefactors Posts: 4,526 Joined: 1-March 04 From: San Mateo, CA Member No.: 1,743 |
Dave, you really have to stop being so angry over this. All politics is compromise. Until 1998, all cars had to be smogged all the way back to 1966, with a complete visual test. Things are still not that bad, even assuming this bill passes as is. How many 914s were junked from 1980 to 1998 because they could no longer pass smog w/o unaffordable expenses? Now we're only losing them to rust and accidents.
As for the "no collectors insurance is available to suit me", you can be certain the market will correct for this. As soon as collector insurance becomes a requirement to jump through this loophole, you'll see a few small insurance companies offering much less restrictive "collectors" insurance. If there are mileage limitations, you can be sure there will suddenly be a spate of broken odometers. I'm not all that concerned about the cutoff date getting removed anytime soon. After all, it took them six years to get a bill modifying the 30 year exemption this close to passing (and it hasn't passed yet). Removing the '76 cutoff will be MUCH harder to do, esp. considering the language in this bill (the word permanent is used), and it could easily take a decade of serious effort. By that same token, it could be that the collector provision be removed instead of the '76 cutoff, so all 35 year old cars would only need to pass a tailpipe test. IMHO, it's just as likely as having the '76 cutoff removed (maybe more so). |
Headrage Ca. Smog Law Changes Aug 24 2004, 09:42 AM
lapuwali Very, very interesting.
My read on this is that t... Aug 24 2004, 10:19 AM
dmenche914 WARNING, DANGER!
This Bill is still BULL, t... Aug 24 2004, 01:18 PM
Marty Yeoman Am I wrong or does it say:
Sec 2 Section 44011 of... Aug 24 2004, 01:46 PM
! Has to go thru BOTH houses again....my opinion the... Aug 24 2004, 02:16 PM
Headrage (6) Prior to Ja... Aug 24 2004, 03:05 PM
dmenche914 Right now, current law is 30 year rolling exemptio... Aug 24 2004, 03:29 PM
lapuwali I have to disagree that the admendment is worthles... Aug 24 2004, 05:06 PM
dmenche914 then again, if my car was 35 plus years old, and r... Aug 24 2004, 07:03 PM
Brad Roberts You'll love this:
BUY BOXSTERS... :D
B Aug 24 2004, 07:08 PM
dmenche914 Geer Ugh, oh well, Had to come to that, but I rat... Aug 24 2004, 07:29 PM
Cap'n Krusty "Maybe all 914's are exempt. I don't think... Aug 24 2004, 08:10 PM
elwood-914 In Amador County, we don't have manditory smog... Aug 24 2004, 10:23 PM
Headrage Additional action has occurred.
http://www.leginf... Aug 25 2004, 10:15 AM
dmenche914 Ok, back to the Assembly, where it already has pas... Aug 25 2004, 11:12 AM
mikester If I'm required to pass the tail pipe test and... Aug 25 2004, 11:56 AM
lapuwali That's the idea of dropping the visual, which ... Aug 25 2004, 12:19 PM
Cloudbuster ... Aug 25 2004, 12:45 PM
lapuwali The bill DOESN'T add '66 - '75 cars ba... Aug 25 2004, 01:09 PM
SirAndy ... Aug 25 2004, 01:22 PM
Cloudbuster ... Aug 25 2004, 02:05 PM
dmenche914 The real danger is if the 35 year classic exemptin... Aug 25 2004, 02:55 PM
Headrage Another update. Don't know what it means when... Aug 26 2004, 12:46 PM
lapuwali Rule 77 (looked this up) has to do with procedures... Aug 26 2004, 01:28 PM
Headrage Anyone know how we could collectively oppose this ... Aug 26 2004, 01:31 PM
Headrage Here's another update. What the hell does all... Aug 27 2004, 10:56 AM
Headrage Sorry, was so pissed I forgot to add the link. :an... Aug 27 2004, 11:00 AM
dflesburg What do you expect from the place that made it oka... Aug 27 2004, 11:17 AM
mikester I know they are trying to get this in before the s... Aug 27 2004, 11:49 AM
fiid
Headrage Actually wouldn't it be '76 and older if i... Aug 27 2004, 12:14 PM
lapuwali Yes, but if this bill passes into law, the cutoff ... Aug 27 2004, 12:26 PM
Headrage I don't know if this is good or bad. I notice... Aug 28 2004, 09:44 PM
Headrage :bump: Aug 29 2004, 03:40 PM
dmenche914 Not a clue what that means, but there is the the A... Aug 29 2004, 04:55 PM
! It's dead....2nd year bills rarely pass..... Aug 29 2004, 05:56 PM
Brando my comment from this post on PAPBB:
California al... Aug 29 2004, 09:24 PM
! First off...MOST if not ALL of the crappy re-tread... Aug 29 2004, 09:29 PM
lapuwali ![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 24th August 2026 - 03:09 PM |
| All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
|
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |