D_jet trouble shooting question - car is home, journey continues, June, update- no more problem-- the fix was simple.... |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
D_jet trouble shooting question - car is home, journey continues, June, update- no more problem-- the fix was simple.... |
DRPHIL914 |
Dec 15 2014, 12:39 PM
Post
#1
|
Dr. Phil Group: Members Posts: 5,767 Joined: 9-December 09 From: Bluffton, SC Member No.: 11,106 Region Association: South East States |
OK. car has been in shop for the past week, and today Bob spent several hours on it but what he found was when the MPS is disconnected from the vac hose it will idle and run, but when it gets connected it goes immediately lean and dies, and will not run with that hose on there- the MPS holds Vac no loss of pressure, but that doesnt mean that its not bad.
1- i thought that if an MPS went bad it defaulted rich? but when this is getting vac it goes lean right away and dies. but it will run and idle with out the vac , the AF meter then shows 9.8-10.2 or so which is of course rich but not flooding out. so the question is why is it going lean when hooked up? when this issue started about 2 weeks ago, it had been running just fine and all of a sudden it quit running. 2. could there be another issue we dont see that would be making it way to lean other than the MPS? might need to test another MPS, my 2nd one i just bought from someone here and it has never been opened but will not hold vac (slowly looses vac pressure) so it probably need to be opened and re-sealed. not a good candidate to trouble shoot with. ------ FYI- 1975 d-jet 2.0. newer wiring harness , CHT is newish(replaced 2 months before this issue started and was running perfect at that time) |
Larmo63 |
Dec 29 2014, 05:37 PM
Post
#2
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 4,264 Joined: 3-March 14 From: San Clemente, Ca Member No.: 17,068 Region Association: Southern California |
After reading this thread and screwing around with my own '73 1.7 FI, I think carbs are a better solution. I know just stating this may start a whole sh*tstorm, but my new engine will have carbs.
With all these acronym parts, hoses, wires, vacuum, testing, the whole mess has me worn out. |
BeatNavy |
Dec 29 2014, 05:44 PM
Post
#3
|
Certified Professional Scapegoat Group: Members Posts: 2,924 Joined: 26-February 14 From: Easton, MD Member No.: 17,042 Region Association: MidAtlantic Region |
After reading this thread and screwing around with my own '73 1.7 FI, I think carbs are a better solution. I know just stating this may start a whole sh*tstorm, but my new engine will have carbs. With all these acronym parts, hoses, wires, vacuum, testing, the whole mess has me worn out. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/WTF.gif) Don't do it, Clint! I've probably replaced every sensor and component on my DJet, and I enjoy the challenge. I spend a lot of time on Anders' page, and to me the FI is well worth it. Keep researching and trying! |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 23rd May 2024 - 08:15 AM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |