Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> At what speed is aero a good idea?, New bumper for #209
Jetsetsurfshop
post Oct 3 2016, 06:12 PM
Post #1


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 814
Joined: 7-April 11
From: Marco Island Florida
Member No.: 12,907
Region Association: South East States



Hey Paddock People,
My car sustained some pretty good front end damaged and the 916 front bumper is destroyed. Thinking this is a good time to change things up. Good news is that already bought the bumper half with the oil cooler cut out. Now I need the bottom half to finish it off.
The thought is should I run a splitter type valance? What is the speed where these cars want downforce? My car's top speed at Sebring is 115mph. I see a lot of HSR 914-6's that don't have a splitter and I know there are faster then I am.
Another thought is that I'm not the only driver of the car and when we have an off track experience, will the splitter still be there??
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/beer.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
Jetsetsurfshop
post Oct 4 2016, 06:55 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 814
Joined: 7-April 11
From: Marco Island Florida
Member No.: 12,907
Region Association: South East States



I took a day off from checking this post and you all took it over!
The tipping point was what I was after. I don't feel my car needs a splitter/wing combo yet. Was looking for what you all thought was the speed when a 914 gets squirrelly.
I think I'll just do the valance like Brant's. Chumpcars do have an occasional off here and there. An air damn splitter combo sounds like a problem waiting to happen.
As far as Brant's off topic post. I never thought my brakes were too cool. Never experienced brake fade in my car after I went 5 lug. I was running Hawk DTC-70s and we never got the rotors hot enough for those. Now I have Porterfields endurance pads because we didn't want to swap pads during a race. Not sure if those are in the optimum temps, but I think I like these more. Stopping didn't fill drastically different form one to the other and there kinder to the rotors.
Thanks for the help.
Anyone have a suggestion on how to buy the valance from?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
brant
post Oct 5 2016, 10:28 AM
Post #3


914 Wizard
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,635
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Colorado
Member No.: 47
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



QUOTE(Jetsetsurfshop @ Oct 4 2016, 06:55 PM) *

I took a day off from checking this post and you all took it over!
The tipping point was what I was after. I don't feel my car needs a splitter/wing combo yet. Was looking for what you all thought was the speed when a 914 gets squirrelly.
I think I'll just do the valance like Brant's. Chumpcars do have an occasional off here and there. An air damn splitter combo sounds like a problem waiting to happen.
As far as Brant's off topic post. I never thought my brakes were too cool. Never experienced brake fade in my car after I went 5 lug. I was running Hawk DTC-70s and we never got the rotors hot enough for those. Now I have Porterfields endurance pads because we didn't want to swap pads during a race. Not sure if those are in the optimum temps, but I think I like these more. Stopping didn't fill drastically different form one to the other and there kinder to the rotors.
Thanks for the help.
Anyone have a suggestion on how to buy the valance from?



Shane,
Regarding the valance
they have probably gotten more pricey than they used to be (like all of these parts)

back when I was building the vintage car in 03-04, it wasn't cost effective to go fiberglass given that the weight savings was minimal. I used a formula at the time to calculate how many pounds would be saved at what cost. The fiberglass valance isn't a ton lighter. I don't remember any more how much... but it was only a few pounds at the time and didn't past my $/lb formula

of course it might be more cost effective now
the valances are still not expensive but if you have to ship one that will add a bit
I think the usual sources, GT, etc all have the Fiberglass ones

every now and then I will have an off or ding my metal one and appreciate that I can pull it out (often without removing it from the car) and don't have to do any fiberglass work on it when that happens.

User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 6th June 2024 - 09:06 AM