![]() |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
![]() |
soloracer |
![]()
Post
#1
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 793 Joined: 7-April 03 From: Calgary Member No.: 538 ![]() |
I like the way this car looks. How about you?
http://www.autoweek.com/classifiedsItem.cm...cms?itemId=1717 What rear tail is that? |
![]() ![]() |
soloracer |
![]()
Post
#2
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 793 Joined: 7-April 03 From: Calgary Member No.: 538 ![]() |
It's true that normally aspirated models make lower torque readings. The turbo cars improve in that catagory signifigantly but I suspect that is true of turbo cars in piston engines as well. For example my 944 turbo makes 280 rwhp and 307 ft-lbs torque whereas my friends RX7 makes 370 rwhp and 309 ft-lbs torque. I would think that if I were making the same rwhp as him my torque would be closer to 400 ft-lbs. His RX7 is a two rotor engine. If you go with a 3 rotor car all the low torque talk is out the window. A stock twin turbo 3 rotor makes 300 hp / 300 ft-lbs of torque.
However, for our "torque" sensitive 901 and 915 transmissions is having lower overall torque and peak torque at high rpms such a bad thing? Sounds to me like a rotary and 914 were meant to be together. So come on guys, follow my lead and drop a rotary in your engine bay. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 17th July 2025 - 04:28 AM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |