Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Nice looking 914 for sale, With a rotary conversion
soloracer
post Oct 19 2004, 07:44 PM
Post #1


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 793
Joined: 7-April 03
From: Calgary
Member No.: 538



I like the way this car looks. How about you?

http://www.autoweek.com/classifiedsItem.cm...cms?itemId=1717

What rear tail is that?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
soloracer
post Oct 19 2004, 11:57 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 793
Joined: 7-April 03
From: Calgary
Member No.: 538



It's true that normally aspirated models make lower torque readings. The turbo cars improve in that catagory signifigantly but I suspect that is true of turbo cars in piston engines as well. For example my 944 turbo makes 280 rwhp and 307 ft-lbs torque whereas my friends RX7 makes 370 rwhp and 309 ft-lbs torque. I would think that if I were making the same rwhp as him my torque would be closer to 400 ft-lbs. His RX7 is a two rotor engine. If you go with a 3 rotor car all the low torque talk is out the window. A stock twin turbo 3 rotor makes 300 hp / 300 ft-lbs of torque.

However, for our "torque" sensitive 901 and 915 transmissions is having lower overall torque and peak torque at high rpms such a bad thing? Sounds to me like a rotary and 914 were meant to be together. So come on guys, follow my lead and drop a rotary in your engine bay. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
soloracer   Nice looking 914 for sale   Oct 19 2004, 07:44 PM
iiibdsiil   Not a bad price, IMO. I don't know what it wou...   Oct 19 2004, 07:48 PM
ChrisReale  
QUOTE
  Oct 19 2004, 07:53 PM
VegasRacer   The contact phone number has a 702 area code. That...   Oct 19 2004, 09:22 PM
bob91403   From what I've heard, the only problem with th...   Oct 19 2004, 10:54 PM
soloracer   So do piston engines. Rotary enthusiasts will poi...   Oct 19 2004, 11:02 PM
soloracer   Here is one of the most true statements ever made ...   Oct 19 2004, 11:15 PM
MattR   and they have no torque.   Oct 19 2004, 11:35 PM
soloracer   It's true that normally aspirated models make ...   Oct 19 2004, 11:57 PM
thesey914   What is the fuel economy like? I have heard they a...   Oct 20 2004, 12:47 AM
ematulac   I've always liked the rotary conversion for th...   Oct 20 2004, 02:08 AM
bob91403   ...   Oct 20 2004, 05:33 AM
VegasRacer   My 1st race car was a RX-7. It was a fun, reliable...   Oct 20 2004, 08:16 AM
Root_Werks   Don't forget the rotary or Wankle engine was a...   Oct 20 2004, 08:22 AM
soloracer   Artechnica: Bang on the money. Couldn't hav...   Oct 20 2004, 08:49 AM
!   ...   Oct 20 2004, 03:58 PM
soloracer   Have you ever heard a 3 rotor? It sounds like a V...   Oct 20 2004, 05:08 PM
MattR   I had never heard a three rotor. It sounds pretty...   Oct 20 2004, 05:27 PM
Aaron Cox     Oct 20 2004, 05:28 PM
Mueller  
QUOTE
  Oct 20 2004, 05:33 PM
MattR   I like the type 4 sound :unsure: thats why i wan...   Oct 20 2004, 06:30 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th July 2025 - 04:28 AM