Capacitive Discharge Ignition, Any benifits to using the MSD system? |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
Capacitive Discharge Ignition, Any benifits to using the MSD system? |
Driver174 |
Jul 30 2018, 08:33 PM
Post
#1
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 106 Joined: 2-February 17 From: Nevada Member No.: 20,806 Region Association: None |
914-4 2L race engine, 10.3:1 compression ratio and twin Weber's
Anyone have experience with the MSD systems on a Type IV? I'm thinking there may be benifits to having the higher spark voltages when compression ratio is relatively high. MSD claims plug gaps of .050 - .060" are possible, and that multiple sparks at lower RPM's improve throttle response. Thus, makes sense, but does anyone have real world experience that support these claims? |
HAM Inc |
Jul 31 2018, 03:11 PM
Post
#2
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 846 Joined: 24-July 06 From: Watkinsville,GA Member No.: 6,499 Region Association: None |
On our 1.8 FProd car (12.3:1 CR) CDI made zero power difference. It did crap out, though, while leading a race at Barber.
I rigged up a back up system I could switch back and forth between on the fly. The back up was a Bosch Blue Coil with no CDI. We tested both systems on the chassis dyno and there was absolutely zero difference in torque or power. We were using a Mallory distributor. Crank fire might be a different story. We ditched the CDI and the attendant complications. |
Mark Henry |
Aug 1 2018, 10:13 AM
Post
#3
|
that's what I do! Group: Members Posts: 20,065 Joined: 27-December 02 From: Port Hope, Ontario Member No.: 26 Region Association: Canada |
On our 1.8 FProd car (12.3:1 CR) CDI made zero power difference. It did crap out, though, while leading a race at Barber. I rigged up a back up system I could switch back and forth between on the fly. The back up was a Bosch Blue Coil with no CDI. We tested both systems on the chassis dyno and there was absolutely zero difference in torque or power. We were using a Mallory distributor. Crank fire might be a different story. We ditched the CDI and the attendant complications. Len how much do you think camber design has to do with this? I've always been on the fence with stock vs fancy ignitions for a /4. For most apps with a T1 and T4 I've never seen any magical power difference between stock and CDI (etc.) The only improvement I've seen has been the off idle issue that some engines have. Where as the /6 uses a CDI from the factory, except for early stock engines and everyone uses a high output ignition system of some type. I use a crankfire on my 180hp 2600cc T4 with aftermarket FI, 44X38mm valves... runs great. But I've also built a similar spec carbed 2700cc T4, used a mallory with just a blue coil I didn't see any real difference ignition wise. |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 16th June 2024 - 04:40 AM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |