Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Why are 1975/1976 heat exchangers considered undesirable?
Tdskip
post Nov 29 2019, 03:58 PM
Post #1


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,686
Joined: 1-December 17
From: soCal
Member No.: 21,666
Region Association: None



Just more convoluted than the earlier ones? Don’t flow as well?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
Mark Henry
post Nov 29 2019, 04:24 PM
Post #2


that's what I do!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 20,065
Joined: 27-December 02
From: Port Hope, Ontario
Member No.: 26
Region Association: Canada



QUOTE(Maltese Falcon @ Nov 29 2019, 05:12 PM) *

Probably the short primary tube design (like a manifold log design), with a long secondary (each bank) leading directly into a restrictive muffler/egr dump/ + cat. Everything the EPA/CARB needed in a '75-'76 914 to run hot and compliant (IMG:style_emoticons/default/evilgrin.gif)
Nothing in this design bringing performance to the table.



(IMG:style_emoticons/default/agree.gif)

The early 2.0 HE's are not headers but at least they're two pipes that go straight back.
Headers are the only true bolt on HP, although the increase isn't that big on a stock engine, on performance engine the difference using a good header is huge.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 16th June 2024 - 04:09 PM