![]() |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
![]() |
GregAmy |
![]()
Post
#1
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,504 Joined: 22-February 13 From: Middletown CT Member No.: 15,565 Region Association: North East States ![]() ![]() |
What should be the maximum capability of the stock D-Jet pressure regulator? Mine only goes to 36.
If that's normal, is there another similar-format regulator that can go up to around 45psi? Background: Microsquirt project. Was hoping to use the stock regulator, but now need something that I can easily mount in the same location, if possible. Injectors I'm using are rated at 43.5psi. Discuss! |
![]() ![]() |
JamesM |
![]()
Post
#2
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,094 Joined: 6-April 06 From: Kearns, UT Member No.: 5,834 Region Association: Intermountain Region ![]() |
Higher pressure provides better fuel atomization, one reason newer cars dont run at 29psi.
Not understanding what the concern with running higher pressure/having a "safety" margin is about. Those are completely custom injections so nothing d-jet applies here (except for maybe the pump and pressure regulator if you retain those). Injector flow rates can potentially get sketchy when run above 80% duty cycle, that is where I would have concern with a safety margin and running lower pressure means higher duty cycle needed to deliver the same amount of fuel, so in that respect you are potentially safer running the HIGHER pressure depending on your fuel needs. If there are concerns about the injectors though I would say contact FiveOMotorsports about them. I would run them at the pressure with the known flow rating. As for the stock pressure regulator, not sure what its maximum pressure spec is but I have seen a d-jet car sitting at ~50psi at the rail before (DAPO, dont ask), so not sure if that is something attainable with most stock regulators and pumps but i have seen it. |
914_teener |
![]()
Post
#3
|
914 Guru ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,266 Joined: 31-August 08 From: So. Cal Member No.: 9,489 Region Association: Southern California ![]() |
Higher pressure provides better fuel atomization, one reason newer cars dont run at 29psi. Not understanding what the concern with running higher pressure/having a "safety" margin is about. Those are completely custom injections so nothing d-jet applies here (except for maybe the pump and pressure regulator if you retain those). Injector flow rates can potentially get sketchy when run above 80% duty cycle, that is where I would have concern with a safety margin and running lower pressure means higher duty cycle needed to deliver the same amount of fuel, so in that respect you are potentially safer running the HIGHER pressure depending on your fuel needs. If there are concerns about the injectors though I would say contact FiveOMotorsports about them. I would run them at the pressure with the known flow rating. As for the stock pressure regulator, not sure what its maximum pressure spec is but I have seen a d-jet car sitting at ~50psi at the rail before (DAPO, dont ask), so not sure if that is something attainable with most stock regulators and pumps but i have seen it. I think that is what Foley is saying. The OP didn't say if he was going to retain the stock pump and I'd assumed he was going to use the linked high impedance injector which is rated at 280 cc/ min at 300Kpa. The OP didn't mention displacement. I know some folds have done MS systems so maybe they'd chime in. |
JamesM |
![]()
Post
#4
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,094 Joined: 6-April 06 From: Kearns, UT Member No.: 5,834 Region Association: Intermountain Region ![]() |
I know some folds have done MS systems so maybe they'd chime in. I have done quite a few of them (IMG:style_emoticons/default/piratenanner.gif) |
914_teener |
![]()
Post
#5
|
914 Guru ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,266 Joined: 31-August 08 From: So. Cal Member No.: 9,489 Region Association: Southern California ![]() |
I know some folds have done MS systems so maybe they'd chime in. I have done quite a few of them (IMG:style_emoticons/default/piratenanner.gif) I know... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/shades.gif) |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 1st July 2025 - 09:39 AM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |