Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> 914 flywheel vs a bus flywheel, any differences?
malcolm2
post Apr 26 2020, 07:43 AM
Post #1


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,749
Joined: 31-May 11
From: Nashville
Member No.: 13,139
Region Association: South East States



I sure can’t see any.

Building a 2.0 from a 1.8 from a 914 for my 72 bus that came with a 1.7. Have both flywheels. I did not label either. The 914 was running when removed so it must be the shinier one. The bus sat in a field for 10 years. So much moisture under there that the magnesium bell housing deteriorated.

Anyway, both are 210 mm. Some vendors say their 914 FW won’t work on a bus and visa-versa.

Anyone have more details?

Attached Image Attached ImageAttached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
GregAmy
post Apr 26 2020, 07:59 AM
Post #2


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,651
Joined: 22-February 13
From: Middletown CT
Member No.: 15,565
Region Association: North East States



One thing I see is that the one on the left does not have the step for the pilot bearing "seal" (a round piece of basically felt that you oil.) Do both have the inside groove for the o-ring?

Measure the flange thicknesses and offsets, see if there's a difference.

Edit: also, check the offset of the ring gear versus its inner base flange (where it mates to the crankshaft.) I seem to recall a prior discussion that this offset was slightly different due to the difference in transaxles used. If so, the 901 trans starter gear may improperly engage with the flywheel ring gear.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
malcolm2
post Apr 26 2020, 08:03 AM
Post #3


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,749
Joined: 31-May 11
From: Nashville
Member No.: 13,139
Region Association: South East States



QUOTE(GregAmy @ Apr 26 2020, 08:59 AM) *

One thing I see is that the one on the left does not have the step for the pilot bearing "seal" (a round piece of basically flannel.) Do both have the inside groove for the o-ring?

Measure the flange thicknesses and offsets, see if there's a difference.


doesn't the "step" come from the fact that the pilot bearing is slightly smaller (shorter) than the thickness of the hole?

The FW on the right still has the pilot bearing installed. FW on the left has the Pilot bearing removed.

And Yes, both have an o-ring groove, even still have the o-rings installed.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
GregAmy
post Apr 26 2020, 08:07 AM
Post #4


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,651
Joined: 22-February 13
From: Middletown CT
Member No.: 15,565
Region Association: North East States



QUOTE(malcolm2 @ Apr 26 2020, 09:03 AM) *
doesn't the "step" come from the fact that the pilot bearing is slightly smaller (shorter) than the thickness of the hole?

Shouldn't matter; after all, that "step" is covered by the plate that goes under the bolts. As I understand it - and how I did it on my engine last month - that step is to make space for the oiled felt seal.

And in case you missed my edit above, measure the offset from the backface to the ring gear.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 2nd April 2026 - 09:50 AM
...