Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> 914/6 Carb to Original FI
mmascari
post Dec 1 2021, 05:55 PM
Post #1


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 321
Joined: 1-September 14
From: Concord, CA
Member No.: 17,850
Region Association: None



I have a 914/6 conversion with a 3.0l SC engine. I have installed PMO 46mm carbs and considering switching to fuel injection. I would prefer to use stock fuel injection. Has anyone had success installing 3.2l engine Fuel injection components on a 3.0 engine?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
targa72e
post Dec 3 2021, 05:18 PM
Post #2


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 263
Joined: 11-September 16
From: colorado
Member No.: 20,392
Region Association: None



I am with Clay I hate carbs as well. Your problem sound like a tuning issue. If you decide to go with fuel injection couple things.
The adapters that have been mentioned are for running a 3.2 manifold on a Turbo motor with stock small 32mm inkakes . The intake on the 3.0 big port and 3.2 head are almost the same. 3.0 39mm 3.2 41mm and adaptors are not required.

3.2 head

Attached Image

big port 3.0

Attached Image

The indent for the fuel injector is a slightly different shape between 3.0 and 3.2. I gasket matched the 3.0 head to the 3.2 gasket with a dremel and bolted the intake directly to the head.
The main difference between 3.0 and 3.2 is the intake port height is different between a 3.0 and 3.2 head (beside port size) is the 3.2 is shorter and there is a thick (about 1/4" thick) gasket that goes between the manifold and head in stock application.

Attached Image

To use the complete 3.2 fuel injection system on a 3.0 is difficult. It would require complete rebuild of the motor, head machining for Temp sensor and 3.2 flywheel. The distributor on the 3.2 rotates the opposite direction of the 3.0 and would require changing the gear on the crank to use 3.2 distributor on 3.0. The 3.2 distributor does not have any trigger or advance mechanisms as the advance is controlled by the ECU and the trigger is from a sensor that reads the teeth on the 3.2 flywheel to provide speed and possition information to the ECU. Temperature sensor screws into 3.2 cylinder head.
It is much easier to use a aftermarket ECU. You can feed engine RPM information to the aftermarket system from the trigger wheel in the SC distributor (or use tach signal).
In my conversion I used the factory 3.2 manifold, throttle body (modified to include Throttle position sensor), fuel rails, injectors and lines.
ECU was aftermarket. Had to add the TPS, Map sensor, intake air sensor, O2 sensor and Engine temp sensor, these were all GM parts on my conversion. I used the SC idle air bybass for fast cold idle.

If you still have the SC intake the blitz system is a pretty complete kit for conversion to EFI.

john

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
mmascari   914/6 Carb to Original FI   Dec 1 2021, 05:55 PM
Steve   I have a 914/6 conversion with a 3.0l SC engine. ...   Dec 1 2021, 06:27 PM
mepstein   Quite a few done on pelican. Search - motronic in...   Dec 1 2021, 06:43 PM
targa72e   I did a SC 3.0 with 3.2 manifold and aftermarket p...   Dec 2 2021, 02:19 PM
pete-stevers   If your PMOs are 40s send me a pm .. I might be in...   Dec 2 2021, 02:31 PM
JmuRiz   Sounds like a good option, but be aware the prices...   Dec 2 2021, 03:28 PM
mmascari   Sounds like a good option, but be aware the price...   Dec 2 2021, 05:14 PM
mepstein   Sounds like a good option, but be aware the pric...   Dec 2 2021, 05:52 PM
mmascari   [quote name='mmascari' post='2964271' date='Dec 2...   Dec 2 2021, 06:48 PM
JmuRiz   Sounds like a good option, but be aware the pric...   Dec 2 2021, 11:41 PM
brant   Sounds like a good option, but be aware the pric...   Dec 3 2021, 06:51 AM
gandalf_025   It is my understanding that the CIS can take more ...   Dec 2 2021, 06:53 PM
ClayPerrine   Use the stock CIS intake and throttle body. Put EF...   Dec 3 2021, 07:32 AM
mmascari   Use the stock CIS intake and throttle body. Put E...   Dec 3 2021, 10:08 AM
ClayPerrine   [quote name='ClayPerrine' post='2964372' date='De...   Dec 3 2021, 11:00 AM
Luke M   I was planning on running a 3.2 EFI on my brothers...   Dec 3 2021, 11:02 AM
mmascari   I was planning on running a 3.2 EFI on my brother...   Dec 3 2021, 11:22 AM
Luke M   I was planning on running a 3.2 EFI on my brothe...   Dec 3 2021, 11:37 AM
gandalf_025   This engine has been in my wife’s 911 for a numb...   Dec 3 2021, 11:47 AM
ClayPerrine   This engine has been in my wife’s 911 for a num...   Dec 3 2021, 01:02 PM
mepstein   I don’t know why everyone says the 3.2 manifolds...   Dec 3 2021, 01:12 PM
ClayPerrine   I don’t know why everyone says the 3.2 manifold...   Dec 3 2021, 02:21 PM
Luke M   I don’t know why everyone says the 3.2 manifold...   Dec 3 2021, 02:26 PM
mmascari   I don’t know why everyone says the 3.2 manifol...   Dec 3 2021, 02:43 PM
Luke M   [quote name='Luke M' post='2964447' date='Dec 3 2...   Dec 3 2021, 06:12 PM
ClayPerrine   I will admit.. I am biased. I hate carburetors. ...   Dec 3 2021, 02:35 PM
targa72e   I am with Clay I hate carbs as well. Your problem ...   Dec 3 2021, 05:18 PM
mepstein   I have a 3.0 case and crank but I’m going to use...   Dec 3 2021, 06:32 PM
jim dorociak   short stoke 3.2 means 98mm pistons and bored out 9...   Dec 6 2021, 10:03 AM


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 8th June 2024 - 03:05 AM