![]() |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
![]() |
Brian Fuerbach |
![]()
Post
#1
|
Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 119 Joined: 1-July 19 From: Orange, Ca Member No.: 23,266 Region Association: Southern California ![]() |
1974 1.8 with L- jet. Been playing with a wide band air fuel meter and noticed that when I lift the throttle the AFR goes to max value on the gauge. I thought it was supposed to go lean. I checked the throttle position switch and it checks out fine. Going to check the wiring harness next.
What else should I check? Decel valve? |
![]() ![]() |
emerygt350 |
![]()
Post
#2
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,982 Joined: 20-July 21 From: Upstate, NY Member No.: 25,740 Region Association: North East States ![]() |
I bet Mr. Injector could tell us exactly how they perform at sub 28 psi.
My gt350 has this crazy soft fall mechanism on the throttle body to stop the same kind of dip issue on throttle close. 14 years later, well 10 years after l-jet, with O2 sensors, and space shuttle computers, and they still couldn't keep a fuel injected motor running with a rapid throttle close. It was so bad, and fudged, that they wouldn't even give you fuel injection with a manual transmission. That took several years for cfi and a complete change to multiport injection (86) for the 302 ho. |
wonkipop |
![]()
Post
#3
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,807 Joined: 6-May 20 From: north antarctica Member No.: 24,231 Region Association: NineFourteenerVille ![]() ![]() |
I bet Mr. Injector could tell us exactly how they perform at sub 28 psi. My gt350 has this crazy soft fall mechanism on the throttle body to stop the same kind of dip issue on throttle close. 14 years later, well 10 years after l-jet, with O2 sensors, and space shuttle computers, and they still couldn't keep a fuel injected motor running with a rapid throttle close. It was so bad, and fudged, that they wouldn't even give you fuel injection with a manual transmission. That took several years for cfi and a complete change to multiport injection (86) for the 302 ho. interesting what you say about no manual with fuel injection. the EC-A, EC-B research i did turned up that VW pushed the L jet into production with primary focus on the VW 412 with auto trans. they could not make D jet work with auto trans and pass emissions test and be driveable. but they could achieve it with L jet. 3 months after the 412 comes the 914 with L jet. and a manual trans. and quite a different set up in terms of distributor, decel valve operation etc. all tweaked differently. hard to find out info on 412 with the 74 L jet setup. and do i really want to know. not really. but it is different the way it all works. think it even copped an EGR when the 914s didn't. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 4th July 2025 - 04:32 AM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |