Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> What are the differences between a 2.0 VW and 914 motor?
DBF
post Jul 1 2022, 10:19 PM
Post #1


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 92
Joined: 29-August 21
From: Wisconsin
Member No.: 25,865
Region Association: Upper MidWest



I have a 76 VW van and a 74 914, both with 2.0 Type 4 motors. I have been searching the internet, without much luck, trying to find out what modifications Porsche did to the internals of the VW Type 4 motor to bump horsepower from 67 to 95, and torque from 101 to 119. I see the heads are different. It also looks like they both used dished mahle pistons, with the Porsche having a 7.6 compression ratio, and the VW a 7.3 compression ratio. Anyone know what else was modified such as camshaft specs, crankshaft, etc. Thanks.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
Montreal914
post Jul 3 2022, 10:50 AM
Post #2


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,571
Joined: 8-August 10
From: Claremont, CA
Member No.: 12,023
Region Association: Southern California



If I recall, the 76 912E had L-Jet. Table says D-Jet... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
nathanxnathan
post Jul 3 2022, 05:53 PM
Post #3


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 283
Joined: 16-February 18
From: Laguna Beach, CA
Member No.: 21,899
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE(Montreal914 @ Jul 3 2022, 09:50 AM) *

If I recall, the 76 912E had L-Jet. Table says D-Jet... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif)


I think you're right, Wikipedia confirms it.

Trying to verify that, I came across a thread on 912bbs.org saying that 912e engines didn't have numbers stamped on the block, and the number on the fans shroud started in "406" and not 2 letters. I don';t have much experience with 912's to know for sure.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
wonkipop
post Jul 3 2022, 06:14 PM
Post #4


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,364
Joined: 6-May 20
From: north antarctica
Member No.: 24,231
Region Association: NineFourteenerVille



QUOTE(nathanxnathan @ Jul 3 2022, 05:53 PM) *

QUOTE(Montreal914 @ Jul 3 2022, 09:50 AM) *

If I recall, the 76 912E had L-Jet. Table says D-Jet... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif)


I think you're right, Wikipedia confirms it.

Trying to verify that, I came across a thread on 912bbs.org saying that 912e engines didn't have numbers stamped on the block, and the number on the fans shroud started in "406" and not 2 letters. I don';t have much experience with 912's to know for sure.


912E is L jet.

bus motor is more or less a bored out 1.8 as @TheCabinetmaker says.
its all about torque. its a truck engine (thats not an insult - just what it is).

the 914 2 is a porsche re-engineered VW engine.
i think Hans Mezger did the design work on it?

EDIT
maybe the most interesting engine of them all is the least known.
1.8 AN engine for europe only.
8.6:1 compression ratio and 85 hp.
pumping out nearly the same as the USA 2.0 L from 75 on.
but carbies and no emissions gear and a taste for high octane fuel.
if they had stuck L jet on that i reckon they might have pulled 90 hp out of it.
but it would have required its own tuned L jet system = more research development $ they didn't have budget for?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 1st June 2024 - 12:14 AM