Clutch Advice, Reuse or Replace? |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
Clutch Advice, Reuse or Replace? |
mzapisek |
Oct 9 2022, 08:43 AM
Post
#1
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 91 Joined: 10-June 04 From: Syracuse, NY Member No.: 2,188 Region Association: North East States |
I have very low mile original 1.7 (30K). I recently installed a 4 post lift and have begun doing all the 50 year service updates (SS fuel lines, shift bushings, engine refresh etc.). I am certainly a novice mechanic at best. The information on this board most definitely helps close the knowledge gap and encourages me to self perform tasks I would otherwise be unsure of. While inspecting the flywheel, clutch and pressure plate they appear to be in very good condition (no grooves or obvious signs of wear) just some slight discoloration.
Should I reuse or replace? I did purchase a new rear main seal but I do not see any signs of a leak. From other info I have read on this board the newer seals are/maybe somewhat substandard. While I welcome the opportunity to fix everything I can while the engine is out and on the stand don’t want to perform unnecessary work or look for problems that don’t exist. Would appreciate some advice. Thanks. |
Superhawk996 |
Oct 12 2022, 08:28 AM
Post
#2
|
914 Guru Group: Members Posts: 5,875 Joined: 25-August 18 From: Woods of N. Idaho Member No.: 22,428 Region Association: Galt's Gulch |
I’m going to go back to the original premise of the post.
What OP has posted: Claimed 30k original miles. He has owned car for 20 years Posted photos show non OEM clutch Photos appear to show at least 2mm or so lining depth above the rivets No grooving in flywheel or clutch No rear main seal leakage What can be inferred from info provided above: Owner rarely drives this car or it would have more than 30k miles in 20 years of ownership. Clutch that came out of the car has much less than 30k miles on it. What we don’t know: Were the pilot bearing / RMS / felt seal previously replaced when the clutch disk was? If yes, then all those parts are far newer and would have far less than 30k miles on them and likewise they would not be 50 year old parts. So now we are down to the key questions: Does the clutch meet thickness specification? Should you disturb the flywheel to replace the RMS? On thickness spec question - only the OP can answer that. Porsche establishes wear specs. It is black or white. Meets or doesn’t meet. There is no sense replacing parts that are in spec. Especially on a clutch we know has less than 30k miles on it. On the flywheel / RMS question. Consider that the flywheel / pressure plate were balanced as an assembly. If the flywheel is removed it MUST be indexed to the crank and hopefully the pressure plate was indexed to the flywheel. If not - OEM balance will be degraded or lost. The only way to regain it would be to send the flywheel and pressure plate out for balance. Removing the RMS has it’s own risks of future leakage even if the seal is replaced. Especially if the flywheel and pressure plate become imbalanced. Flywheel pilot bearing. If it is 30k miles on it (or less), has grease in it, and spins freely, it is fine and probably a better quality bearing than anything currently coming out of the aftermarket. Other considerations: Environmental / sustainability - if we / you / OP are committed to this concept - why throw away good parts (assuming they meet spec)? Consider the energy used to mine and transport all the raw materials we are talking about. OP - feel free to send me that clutch - I’ll gladly reuse it if meets thickness spec. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif) So what would I do? If clutch / flywheel / pressure plate meet spec - put it back together. RMS - this is one of the few times that I’d say if it isn’t broke - don’t fix it. There are a lot of variables in a RMS replacement that can get messed up. Especially by a novice mechanic. A good part of the advice is based on how little this car actually gets driven.. If I were taking about a daily driver - I would do it. Clutch work / RMS is so easy to do on a 914 - if it leaks in the future fix it then. By then OP will be a bit more experienced mechanic. |
iankarr |
Oct 12 2022, 07:53 PM
Post
#3
|
The wrencher formerly known as Cuddy_K Group: Members Posts: 2,480 Joined: 22-May 15 From: Heber City, UT Member No.: 18,749 Region Association: Intermountain Region |
I’m going to go back to the original premise of the post. What OP has posted: Claimed 30k original miles. He has owned car for 20 years Posted photos show non OEM clutch Photos appear to show at least 2mm or so lining depth above the rivets No grooving in flywheel or clutch No rear main seal leakage What can be inferred from info provided above: Owner rarely drives this car or it would have more than 30k miles in 20 years of ownership. Clutch that came out of the car has much less than 30k miles on it. What we don’t know: Were the pilot bearing / RMS / felt seal previously replaced when the clutch disk was? If yes, then all those parts are far newer and would have far less than 30k miles on them and likewise they would not be 50 year old parts. So now we are down to the key questions: Does the clutch meet thickness specification? Should you disturb the flywheel to replace the RMS? On thickness spec question - only the OP can answer that. Porsche establishes wear specs. It is black or white. Meets or doesn’t meet. There is no sense replacing parts that are in spec. Especially on a clutch we know has less than 30k miles on it. On the flywheel / RMS question. Consider that the flywheel / pressure plate were balanced as an assembly. If the flywheel is removed it MUST be indexed to the crank and hopefully the pressure plate was indexed to the flywheel. If not - OEM balance will be degraded or lost. The only way to regain it would be to send the flywheel and pressure plate out for balance. Removing the RMS has it’s own risks of future leakage even if the seal is replaced. Especially if the flywheel and pressure plate become imbalanced. Flywheel pilot bearing. If it is 30k miles on it (or less), has grease in it, and spins freely, it is fine and probably a better quality bearing than anything currently coming out of the aftermarket. Other considerations: Environmental / sustainability - if we / you / OP are committed to this concept - why throw away good parts (assuming they meet spec)? Consider the energy used to mine and transport all the raw materials we are talking about. OP - feel free to send me that clutch - I’ll gladly reuse it if meets thickness spec. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif) So what would I do? If clutch / flywheel / pressure plate meet spec - put it back together. RMS - this is one of the few times that I’d say if it isn’t broke - don’t fix it. There are a lot of variables in a RMS replacement that can get messed up. Especially by a novice mechanic. A good part of the advice is based on how little this car actually gets driven.. If I were taking about a daily driver - I would do it. Clutch work / RMS is so easy to do on a 914 - if it leaks in the future fix it then. By then OP will be a bit more experienced mechanic. As usual, Superhawk has applied great deductive logic. Agree that the amount the car will be driven is a key factor as well. As for re-using the clutch disk, is there a downside to how a used clutch disc will “mate” with a new or resurfaced flywheel? I’ve never done that before. Will they eventually match to each other? |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 1st June 2024 - 03:30 AM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |