Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> rear brake caliper options, somehow it always gets complicated
blabla914
post Jan 17 2005, 10:22 AM
Post #1


I like primer
**

Group: Members
Posts: 321
Joined: 1-March 04
From: Connecticut
Member No.: 1,740
Region Association: None



The short version.

I just want to check to be sure that the bolt spacing on 914 rear calipers is the same as early (we'll say '65-73 or so) 911.

Thanks for your help.

Kelly

The long version.

I have '69E front struts and brakes. They were very cheap and work great. I am currently using them with 914-6 rear rotors (yes the car is 5 bolt) and 914-4 rear calipers. I have an adjustable bias valve.
My problem is I used to have a nice bias adustment range with the stock 4 cylinder brakes. Now the bias, even with the valve closed or removed is OK for the street, but I like a little more rear bias for autocross. Yes I realize you can get yourself into a mess in a hurry this way. I would also like to go to wider tires on the rear than in the front and my experience is this will make my bias problems worse.
The solution I'm looking at is using '69 911T/912 rear calipers. These have the larger pad area to match my '69E fronts, but will allow the use of my solid 914-6 rear rotors. It also means that I could swap back to my 914-4 rear calipers to use my e-brake when driving on the street if necessary. This is important to me as I drive the car all summer, everyday and I may need an e-brake if inspection laws change. I would also avoid having to turn down '69 and up vented rear rotors to the 286mm diameter. I have read elsewhere on the forum vented rear disks aren't necessary with a small six like my 2.0E.

Who out there has done this conversion? Anything I am missing?

Thanks for your help.

Kelly
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
lapuwali
post Jan 17 2005, 04:35 PM
Post #2


Not another one!
****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 4,526
Joined: 1-March 04
From: San Mateo, CA
Member No.: 1,743



QUOTE (davep @ Jan 17 2005, 02:02 PM)
I can't imagine why the factory got it so wrong. Almost every 911 got rear vented rotors.

The 914/6 had almost the same calipers on the rear as the 911 but didn't get the vented rotors. The GT rotors were similar to the 911 casting but unique to that car. The front was the same as the 911.

Um, lots of apples and oranges here.

We've been talking about 914s, 911s, BMWs, and Audis, and trying to compare braking systems between them. They're all very different cars with very different weights and very different weight distributions. The 914 was, by and large, also a lot less expensive than the other cars mentioned, so it's going to come with a more minimal braking system.

The earliest 911s didn't come with vented rotors at either end. The earliest cars also weighed a lot less than the later cars, so it's likely they didn't NEED the vented rotors. A typical 914 weighs about the same as a very early 911, so there's a reasonably fair comparison. Even the early 911 needed much more brake on the back than a 914 simply due to weight distribution diffferences.

Discussing the BMW and Audi are really bringing in a set of oranges to an apple discussion, as they weigh a LOT more than a 914, and again have very different weight distribution from the 914 or the 911. Trying to extrapolate what's going to work on a 914 by looking at what works on a recent BMW or a later 911, is not going to work.

914s are light, and when you throw more money at it to add very light 5-bolt Fuchs on it, you're throwing away much of that advantage by hanging heavy vented rotors on it. On a street or AX car, I'd strongly argue that they're not necessary. If you've never experienced actual brake fade on the AX course, then vented rotors aren't going to buy you anything, and will add weight in the worst possible place.

If you want better braking, work on bias and pads. If you have an adjustable prop valve on the car and you still have too little braking on the rear, then the calipers you have on the front are too big (pistons are too big), or the pistons on the back are too small. You can adjust the bias by simply putting calipers with bigger pistons on the back, or calipers with smaller pistons on the front. With the former, pedal effort will be lower, but pedal stroke will be longer. With the latter, shorter pedal stroke, but more effort. It mostly comes down to a personal preference on which one works better for you. On an AX course, you want pads that work well cold. If you have track pads on the car now, you may not be getting top braking on the AX course, as such pads often work better hot.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
blabla914   rear brake caliper options   Jan 17 2005, 10:22 AM
Mueller   I've often wondered how necessary it is to hav...   Jan 17 2005, 11:00 AM
blabla914   Mueller, Thank you for not only answering my ques...   Jan 17 2005, 02:18 PM
Mueller     Jan 17 2005, 02:27 PM
lapuwali   <...   Jan 17 2005, 03:17 PM
davep   I can't imagine why the factory got it so wron...   Jan 17 2005, 04:02 PM
Mueller  
  Jan 17 2005, 04:17 PM
lapuwali     Jan 17 2005, 04:35 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 16th June 2024 - 08:38 PM