Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Recommendation on fuel pressure regulator for return line on dual carb
Tdskip
post Apr 13 2024, 04:36 PM
Post #1


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,686
Joined: 1-December 17
From: soCal
Member No.: 21,666
Region Association: None



Hi folks end hope everybody’s having a decent Saturday.

I need to button up another project car that was previously (long time ago and original engine long gone) a fuel injection car so it’s got the return line like they all do.

It looks like many of you like to use a pressure regulator in the return line, rather than simply capping it off, and I was wondering if there’s a specific regulator that you would recommend or if a Holley rotary dial to select pressure unit is fine to use.

Thanks!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
technicalninja
post Apr 16 2024, 02:35 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,338
Joined: 31-January 23
From: Granbury Texas
Member No.: 27,135
Region Association: Southwest Region



Be careful here!

What many have alluded to are simple single input/output no return line regulators.

A regulator that is designed to return fuel to the tank is a different creature.

Make sure which one you have.

Simple type are direct feed before the carbs and only feed the carbs. You might have a tee past it to feed a pair of carbs. There will be no return to the tank.

The return line style will be installed past the carbs.

The return line style are better IMO but have more leak points and more complexity.

Making 200+ HP and require significant flow the return line style is what I'd use.
Everything would be expensive.

A common streetcar with below 150hp I'd try the simple one first.
Everything would be on the cheaper side of things.
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
stownsen914
post Apr 17 2024, 10:01 AM
Post #3


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 916
Joined: 3-October 06
From: Ossining, NY
Member No.: 6,985
Region Association: None



There are a few different kinds of regulators out there, and different ways to plumb.

Some use the simple dial type pre-carb in a "deadhead" (no return line) arrangement to limit pressure. Or as suggested, use a low pressure carb compatible fuel pump in a deadhead arrangement. For a lower hp setup it'll work fine in most cases.

A setup with a return can have some advantages like steadier pressure, and a cooler supply of fuel to the carbs. A couple commons ways to do it:
1. Have a multi-port regulator pre-carb. One outlet to each carb, and a third going back the tank.
2. Have a Y or T connector dividing the supply line to the carbs. Have exit lines from the carbs go to a second T - this is your return line. Regulator in the return line, then back to the tank. This way keeps a cooler supply of fuel running through the carbs. It's a small advantage, but why not take it?

Related note - EFI always have a return line, and many manufacturers including Porsche have used approach #2. No reason it won't well on a carb setup. I have my carb'd 911 racecar and MFI 914 racecar set up this way.

I don't recall the brands of regulators I used, but they were whatever recogizable brand was reasonably priced at Summit Racing, probably. Note that the common Holley units regulate down to like 5-8 psi last I knew, which is too high for Webers which like 3-3.5 psi.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 9th June 2024 - 12:55 AM