![]() |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
![]() |
Robroe |
![]()
Post
#1
|
Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 76 Joined: 10-August 21 From: Wenatchee, WA Member No.: 25,793 Region Association: Pacific Northwest ![]() |
Moved from topic of first start of 10 year old build to tear down, inspect and reassemble. The 10 year old build is from a 73 1.7 to a 2270. Stroked to 78 mm and 96 mm cylinder diameter. Heads are Ham/RAT with 36 mm exhaust and 44 mm intake. Both are nicely ported.
Have torn it down to the case and checking crank end play before I split the case and pull the cam and crank. So far, everything is new and looks in good order. I'm concerned about oil passages being blocked with old assembly lube so a complete tear down and reassemble is happening. Discovered stacked cylinder spacers (4) totaling .150". So looking to replace those with single spacers. So far I can only find .160" spacers from type 4 store and may just use them as impact on compression appears minimal. Was shocked to discover crank end play is .450"! Sure glad I didn't try to start this thing. Will check again in the morning to make sure I'm checking it correctly, but I'm doing the same thing on the videos such as Ian Carrs YouTube engine builds so pretty sure I'm checking it correctly. Now to figure out what to do about that huge end play. Any thoughts about what to watch out for? |
![]() ![]() |
technicalninja |
![]()
Post
#2
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,531 Joined: 31-January 23 From: Granbury Texas Member No.: 27,135 Region Association: Southwest Region ![]() ![]() |
A few times in that vid you can see big ass holes (3/4"?) in the "oil towers" on all of the cases.
He doesn't say shit about them. I'm thinking crankcase ventilation but. "Inquiring minds want to know..." What do you think @Superhawk996 |
Superhawk996 |
![]()
Post
#3
|
914 Guru ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 7,031 Joined: 25-August 18 From: Woods of N. Idaho Member No.: 22,428 Region Association: Galt's Gulch ![]() ![]() |
A few times in that vid you can see big ass holes (3/4"?) in the "oil towers" on all of the cases. He doesn't say shit about them. I'm thinking crankcase ventilation but. "Inquiring minds want to know..." What do you think @Superhawk996 I don’t know for sure. I don’t think I see that on all three cases but maybe didn’t watch close enough. I do know that HAM and RAT did some work to determine what really was needed for optimal case breathing but it isn’t entirely clear where they vented the 3/4” breather. It seems this was also focused more on racing and potentially on a dry sump oiling system so (IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif) Seems like they said that for typical road use with wet sump, a more conventional breather can is sufficient. I’ve always built close to stock engines so I’ve never had breather issues. Link to HAM/RAT breather study http://newsite.hamheads.com/2016/12/10/typ...tests-analysis/ |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 9th May 2025 - 10:49 PM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |