![]() |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
![]() |
Jgilliam914 |
![]()
Post
#1
|
914 Guru ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,370 Joined: 30-July 12 From: Iowa / Florida Member No.: 14,732 Region Association: Upper MidWest ![]() |
I was digging through a storage tote and found a set of NPR 96mm pistons and cylinders.
Is there a difference between one that fits a 1.7 vs a 2.0? |
![]() ![]() |
brant |
![]()
Post
#2
|
914 Wizard ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 12,055 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Colorado Member No.: 47 Region Association: Rocky Mountains ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yes.
Wrist pin height as you have to use the rods for 2.0/1.7 |
ClayPerrine |
![]()
Post
#3
|
Life's been good to me so far..... ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 16,517 Joined: 11-September 03 From: Hurst, TX. Member No.: 1,143 Region Association: NineFourteenerVille ![]() ![]() |
|
bdstone914 |
![]()
Post
#4
|
bdstone914 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,118 Joined: 8-November 03 From: Riverside CA Member No.: 1,319 ![]() |
QUOTE Yes. Wrist pin height as you have to use the rods for 2.0/1.7 @Brant Why do you say that? I ran a 1.8 crank and rods with 2.0 pistons and cylinders for years. Is there something I don't know and got seriously lucky? interesting. the 2.0 crank was made by offsetting the rod journal. I believe the wrist pin height is different between the 1.8 and 2.0 pistons. Could it be that the 2.0 pistons on 2.8 rods positioned the piston correctly? Clay, Do you remember if you shimmed the barrels and what deck height you ran? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/popcorn[1].gif) |
ClayPerrine |
![]()
Post
#5
|
Life's been good to me so far..... ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 16,517 Joined: 11-September 03 From: Hurst, TX. Member No.: 1,143 Region Association: NineFourteenerVille ![]() ![]() |
QUOTE Yes. Wrist pin height as you have to use the rods for 2.0/1.7 @Brant Why do you say that? I ran a 1.8 crank and rods with 2.0 pistons and cylinders for years. Is there something I don't know and got seriously lucky? interesting. the 2.0 crank was made by offsetting the rod journal. I believe the wrist pin height is different between the 1.8 and 2.0 pistons. Could it be that the 2.0 pistons on 2.8 rods positioned the piston correctly? Clay, Do you remember if you shimmed the barrels and what deck height you ran? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/popcorn[1].gif) I did not have to shim the cylinders. It has been a long time since I built it, so I don't remember the deck height measurement. But I never had a problem with any interference between the pistons and the head. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 15th September 2025 - 04:59 PM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |