Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> MPS, Rebuilding the MPS
Ron914
post May 8 2025, 05:06 PM
Post #1


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 328
Joined: 19-April 22
From: Huntington Beach,Ca
Member No.: 26,487
Region Association: Southern California



Hello to all who have helped me with this project . @emerygt350 ,@TJB/914, @Superhawk996 , @ChrisFoley , @rjames , @MDTerp
I am in the middle of rebuilding my MPS and have a couple of comments and questions .
First when I opened up the unit I found the most difficult job was removing the rivets holding the two halves together.
When I removed the retainer plate to take out the old diaphragm it was in two pieces .
Attached Image
I needed to take two measurements since I was replacing the stop screw , I needed to measure the the stop screw protrusion into the housing . The instruction sheet sent to me by a member had the measurements he must have made when rebuilding his MPS . His stop screw protrusion was 1.97mm and mine only measured 1.72mm.
His inner/outer screw assembly depth in the old diaphragm measured 6.51mm .
Here's one of my questions ?
when I measured mine I got two measurements depth to inner/outer screw assembly was 4.03
and depth to the washer outside the inner/outer screw assembly was 5.46mm.
Again there is a difference and since mine was never accessed before (epoxy over screw was not disturbed) is the difference in measurements ok and which measurement should I use I will try to attach a photo or two to help with my question.
this one .
Attached Image
I have not touched either of these measurements yet and awaiting any help/comments.
I think it's this one to the washer on diaphragm .
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
rjames
post May 9 2025, 10:01 AM
Post #2


I'm made of metal
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,246
Joined: 24-July 05
From: Shoreline, WA
Member No.: 4,467
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



Crazy that it could hold vacuum at all!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Superhawk996
post May 9 2025, 01:24 PM
Post #3


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,031
Joined: 25-August 18
From: Woods of N. Idaho
Member No.: 22,428
Region Association: Galt's Gulch



QUOTE(rjames @ May 9 2025, 12:01 PM) *

Crazy that it could hold vacuum at all!

Mine did the same thing. It’s my belief that they don’t actually fracture into two pieces until you crack the case open.

I think it’s basically a giant stress crack but it’s not fully fractured. Thus the partial leakage.

Because there is the partial leak it basically prevents the diaphragm from moving anywhere near full travel - thus limiting further stress on the diaphragm when it’s assembled.

Then when the case is pulled open, it lets go all the way around. I can’t prove that but like you, seems to me if the whole thing was literally in two pieces it wouldn’t even hold the partial vacuum.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 10th May 2025 - 01:52 AM