![]() |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
![]() |
Ron914 |
![]()
Post
#1
|
Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 328 Joined: 19-April 22 From: Huntington Beach,Ca Member No.: 26,487 Region Association: Southern California ![]() ![]() |
Hello to all who have helped me with this project . @emerygt350 ,@TJB/914, @Superhawk996 , @ChrisFoley , @rjames , @MDTerp
I am in the middle of rebuilding my MPS and have a couple of comments and questions . First when I opened up the unit I found the most difficult job was removing the rivets holding the two halves together. When I removed the retainer plate to take out the old diaphragm it was in two pieces . ![]() I needed to take two measurements since I was replacing the stop screw , I needed to measure the the stop screw protrusion into the housing . The instruction sheet sent to me by a member had the measurements he must have made when rebuilding his MPS . His stop screw protrusion was 1.97mm and mine only measured 1.72mm. His inner/outer screw assembly depth in the old diaphragm measured 6.51mm . Here's one of my questions ? when I measured mine I got two measurements depth to inner/outer screw assembly was 4.03 and depth to the washer outside the inner/outer screw assembly was 5.46mm. Again there is a difference and since mine was never accessed before (epoxy over screw was not disturbed) is the difference in measurements ok and which measurement should I use I will try to attach a photo or two to help with my question. this one . ![]() I have not touched either of these measurements yet and awaiting any help/comments. I think it's this one to the washer on diaphragm . ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
rjames |
![]()
Post
#2
|
I'm made of metal ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,246 Joined: 24-July 05 From: Shoreline, WA Member No.: 4,467 Region Association: Pacific Northwest ![]() ![]() |
Crazy that it could hold vacuum at all!
|
Superhawk996 |
![]()
Post
#3
|
914 Guru ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 7,031 Joined: 25-August 18 From: Woods of N. Idaho Member No.: 22,428 Region Association: Galt's Gulch ![]() ![]() |
Crazy that it could hold vacuum at all! Mine did the same thing. It’s my belief that they don’t actually fracture into two pieces until you crack the case open. I think it’s basically a giant stress crack but it’s not fully fractured. Thus the partial leakage. Because there is the partial leak it basically prevents the diaphragm from moving anywhere near full travel - thus limiting further stress on the diaphragm when it’s assembled. Then when the case is pulled open, it lets go all the way around. I can’t prove that but like you, seems to me if the whole thing was literally in two pieces it wouldn’t even hold the partial vacuum. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 10th May 2025 - 01:52 AM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |