![]() |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
![]() |
Shivers |
![]()
Post
#1
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,049 Joined: 19-October 20 From: La Quinta, CA Member No.: 24,781 Region Association: Southern California ![]() |
Because the port is almost straight, with little long side short side concerns, with what there is , do you find it necessary to slow the flow down on the “short side” to get good flow out of the valve. I was reading about something mepstein posted a picture of. Small divots, like a golf ball. So I’m going to do that on the long side, just wondering if there is any reason not to also do it on the short side. Thanks guy’s (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
HAM Inc |
![]()
Post
#2
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 850 Joined: 24-July 06 From: Watkinsville,GA Member No.: 6,499 Region Association: None ![]() |
It's true that there aren't many 200hp 2.0's out there. But back in 2006 Jake and I collaborated on a SCCA EP engine that made 206hp at around 7500rpm's. It was legal, reliable and raced well. Was a turd under about 5K RPM's but it didn't see those revs in a race.
We also had 1.8 FP engine that made 186HP. It too was legal, reliable and raced well. 100hp/liter is doable with a N.A. T4 but it wouldn't be streetable. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 16th June 2025 - 07:44 AM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |