Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Which Spring is Sprung?, Not sure we have the answer here at 914 World ?
ctc911ctc
post May 20 2025, 06:55 PM
Post #1


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,129
Joined: 9-June 18
From: boston
Member No.: 22,206
Region Association: North East States



1970 916-6 all original

I rebuilt the Marelli distro, it was caked in grease and the shaft was sticking because of the shaft grease had turned into glue,,,,,,,typical stuff.

Purchased the rebuild kit from one of our best vendors, and when I went to replace the springs I noticed that one was very different from within the kit. Sooooo, either the kit is wrong or the previous owner/mechanic/factory used a different spring formula.

Attached Image

The ones on the left are the same, each are in good shape, the ones on the right are VERY different. My guess is that the advance curve is designed to be smoother through the arc of the engine RPMs, where one side of the two weights advances first and then the other. My concern is that the stiffer spring is really stiff, even on a log scale there is a long way between these two.

Any ideas as to which is the correct one? (Yes I did triple check that I had ordered the correct kit.)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
porschetub
post May 20 2025, 09:46 PM
Post #2


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,830
Joined: 25-July 15
From: New Zealand
Member No.: 18,995
Region Association: None



QUOTE(ctc911ctc @ May 21 2025, 12:55 PM) *

1970 916-6 all original

I rebuilt the Marelli distro, it was caked in grease and the shaft was sticking because of the shaft grease had turned into glue,,,,,,,typical stuff.

Purchased the rebuild kit from one of our best vendors, and when I went to replace the springs I noticed that one was very different from within the kit. Sooooo, either the kit is wrong or the previous owner/mechanic/factory used a different spring formula.

Attached Image

The ones on the left are the same, each are in good shape, the ones on the right are VERY different. My guess is that the advance curve is designed to be smoother through the arc of the engine RPMs, where one side of the two weights advances first and then the other. My concern is that the stiffer spring is really stiff, even on a log scale there is a long way between these two.

Any ideas as to which is the correct one? (Yes I did triple check that I had ordered the correct kit.)

Did you buy the BX or AX kit ? , yours will be an AX dizzy if correct fitment ?
The kit you have could be a BX type which from memory is for the 2.4T dizzy and has a different advance requirement hence the heavy springs.
IMO fit the springs for your old unit if correct as you mentioned the engine ran fine previously ,can't see an issue here ,cheers.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 22nd May 2025 - 11:54 PM