Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Webcam 73 valve clearance, Does the Webcam change the exhaust valve adjustment
timofly
post Sep 22 2025, 03:15 PM
Post #1


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 169
Joined: 21-February 09
From: VA
Member No.: 10,082
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



My 2.0 (actually probably about 2.2 with oversized cylinders) car has had a Webcam 73 in it since a complete overhaul in 2010. I have used the usual recommendation of .006 intake and .008 exhaust for 15 years. I recently read something (and I can't recall where) that said that with the Webcam, the exhaust should be at .006. I know the 1.7 and 1.8 engines called for that, and maybe the source was referring to those engines, but I am curious. It's time for another adjustment. I've always assumed that a bit more clearance might mean the engine will be noisier, but it's less likely to be a cause for deep regrets that setting them too tight. Anybody ever heard this suggestion for .006 on the 2.0 cars?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
porschetub
post Sep 22 2025, 04:12 PM
Post #2


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,930
Joined: 25-July 15
From: New Zealand
Member No.: 18,995
Region Association: None



QUOTE(timofly @ Sep 23 2025, 09:15 AM) *

My 2.0 (actually probably about 2.2 with oversized cylinders) car has had a Webcam 73 in it since a complete overhaul in 2010. I have used the usual recommendation of .006 intake and .008 exhaust for 15 years. I recently read something (and I can't recall where) that said that with the Webcam, the exhaust should be at .006. I know the 1.7 and 1.8 engines called for that, and maybe the source was referring to those engines, but I am curious. It's time for another adjustment. I've always assumed that a bit more clearance might mean the engine will be noisier, but it's less likely to be a cause for deep regrets that setting them too tight. Anybody ever heard this suggestion for .006 on the 2.0 cars?

My understanding is that .008 was used when VW used sodium filled valve's , the cam used has no bearing on this and is recommended because sodium exhaust valves are a thing of the past .
You will be fine with .006 ,cheers.
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
cgnj
post Sep 22 2025, 05:25 PM
Post #3


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 686
Joined: 6-March 03
From: Medford, NJ
Member No.: 403
Region Association: None



QUOTE(porschetub @ Sep 22 2025, 03:12 PM) *

QUOTE(timofly @ Sep 23 2025, 09:15 AM) *

My 2.0 (actually probably about 2.2 with oversized cylinders) car has had a Webcam 73 in it since a complete overhaul in 2010. I have used the usual recommendation of .006 intake and .008 exhaust for 15 years. I recently read something (and I can't recall where) that said that with the Webcam, the exhaust should be at .006. I know the 1.7 and 1.8 engines called for that, and maybe the source was referring to those engines, but I am curious. It's time for another adjustment. I've always assumed that a bit more clearance might mean the engine will be noisier, but it's less likely to be a cause for deep regrets that setting them too tight. Anybody ever heard this suggestion for .006 on the 2.0 cars?

My understanding is that .008 was used when VW used sodium filled valve's , the cam used has no bearing on this and is recommended because sodium exhaust valves are a thing of the past .
You will be fine with .006 ,cheers.

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/agree.gif) 2.0 used Na filled valve to improve heat transfer. It's no longer a thing unless you still have Na filled valves. I guess the disposal problems outweighed the thermal improvement.
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 22nd September 2025 - 11:26 PM
...