Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Koni or Bilstein ?
Fazasport
post Aug 3 2026, 12:21 PM
Post #1


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 13
Joined: 7-November 23
From: Tallahassee FL
Member No.: 27,713
Region Association: South East States



I am looking to replace the rear shocks and front strut inserts on my 1970 914. I will be using the car for tours, rallies, spirited driving and maybe an occasional Autocross not for track work. I am interested in a firmer ride than stock but not a harsh ride. The car does not have front or rear anti-roll bars currently.
If choosing between Koni or Bilstein which would provide the LEAST harsher ride quality?
I will also replacing the rear springs. With that in mind, should I stay with the stock 90lb springs or substitute that 100lb springs from the 914-6?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
Jack Standz
post Aug 3 2026, 05:09 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 909
Joined: 15-November 19
From: Happy Place (& surrounding area)
Member No.: 23,644
Region Association: None



We too are running Bilsteins all around, 100 pound rear springs, stock 911 front and stock 914 rear sways bars, raised spindles by 19mm with turbo tie-rods and stock 911 torsion bars. Our car is lower than stock and we run 16 x7 front and 16x8 964 wheels (D90) with 185/50 front and 245/35 rear tires.

When first driving this combination (with new control arm and trailing arm bushings), it was awful. Very harsh. Did not like it. Now after around 3k miles, it’s much better. Street only, so maybe next time less rear spring and softer torsion bars.

However, the current plan is to restore our ‘72 to very close to stock, but with the addition of front and rear 914 sway bars, leave spindle height alone, stock 4 lug Mahle wheels, etc. Already have stock rear springs and shocks/struts all around, wheels, sway bars, etc.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Fazasport
post Aug 4 2026, 04:43 AM
Post #3


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 13
Joined: 7-November 23
From: Tallahassee FL
Member No.: 27,713
Region Association: South East States



QUOTE(Jack Standz @ Aug 3 2026, 07:09 PM) *

We too are running Bilsteins all around, 100 pound rear springs, stock 911 front and stock 914 rear sways bars, raised spindles by 19mm with turbo tie-rods and stock 911 torsion bars. Our car is lower than stock and we run 16 x7 front and 16x8 964 wheels (D90) with 185/50 front and 245/35 rear tires.

When first driving this combination (with new control arm and trailing arm bushings), it was awful. Very harsh. Did not like it. Now after around 3k miles, it’s much better. Street only, so maybe next time less rear spring and softer torsion bars.

However, the current plan is to restore our ‘72 to very close to stock, but with the addition of front and rear 914 sway bars, leave spindle height alone, stock 4 lug Mahle wheels, etc. Already have stock rear springs and shocks/struts all around, wheels, sway bars, etc.

Jack Standz - My '70 has 4 bolt 5.5" wheels with 195-65-15 Michelin Defender tires, I will probably change them out for `85-70-15 Vedersteins at some point. Also down the road I may add factory 914 front and rear sway bars in order to reduce roll on the twisties.
You mentioned that you have stock rear springs and shocks on your '72. Does that mean Boge shocks and 90 lb springs?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 25th August 2026 - 02:00 PM
...