Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Carbs vs FI
Type 4
post May 8 2005, 10:48 PM
Post #1


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 412
Joined: 30-September 04
From: Costa Mesa Calif.
Member No.: 2,866



Here is the dyno sheet for the 2054cc engine with carbs.


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
lapuwali
post May 9 2005, 02:49 PM
Post #2


Not another one!
****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 4,526
Joined: 1-March 04
From: San Mateo, CA
Member No.: 1,743



Which ECU is, IMHO, not all that relevant, assuming any ECU can be tuned appropriately. What IS relevant to this particular comparison is the fact that carbs were swapped for throttle bodies. If you plot the two power curves on the same scale, you'll see that the difference in power rises as the revs rise. Under about 4000rpm, they make the same power. Above that, the EFI engine's curve rises away from the carb'd engines curve. This strongly suggests that the carbs used in the comparison were too small, and were flowing too little air at upper revs. The freer flowing throttle bodies kept flowing, so they produced more power at higher revs.

Jake's results show similar curves when layed atop each other. The divergence happens a tad earlier on those graphs (3500 rather than 4000), but it's still close.

This doesn't mean this is an unfair comparison. One of the advantages of EFI is that the effectiveness of the fuelling is decoupled from the air velocity through the throttle body. In a carb, if air velocity falls too much (carb too big), fuel control gets very erratic. So, an engine with big carbs tends to suffer from poor drivability, so for a daily driver, you tend to deliberately run carbs that are too small to keep good fuel control. In an EFI setup, flow velocity is irrelevant to fuel control (but NOT completely irrelevant to power), so you can run bigger throttle bodies with EFI and retain good drivability, thus getting the high rev benefits of big throats with none (or few) of the downsides).

If you used, say, 44IDFs with 36mm venturis, and compared them against 36mm throttle bodies, you'd see very similar power figures. Comparing 44IDFs with 50mm Jenvey throttle bodies is not an apples to apples comparison, even though a well-tuned EFI setup with those TBs would probably drive just as nicely as the same engine with well-tuned 44IDFs.

Sanity is restored. Now I understand how this 30% number is possible.

So, bolting aftermarket EFI onto a 914 engine using the stock intake plumbing will NOT give you a 20-30% power increase. It MAY help if you use a larger throttle body. Using a throttle body that flows more than the engine will take offers no help at all to power, and only makes the throttle action "jumpy", as you're changing the ratio of throttle pedal movement to airflow into the engine. Since it's very likely (but unconfirmed) that the stock throttle body is adequate for an otherwise stock 2.0, it's very unlikely adding a bigger one will help. So, you're not going to see much, if any, power increase by using any aftermarket ECU with an otherwise stock engine in place of an otherwise properly functioning D-Jet or L-Jet system. 5% is pretty much the outside, by simply cleaning up the fuel delivery a tad.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
Type 4   Carbs vs FI   May 8 2005, 10:48 PM
Type 4   2054 with FI   May 8 2005, 10:49 PM
Type 4   The only change was the Carb was replace with the ...   May 8 2005, 10:51 PM
MattR   This is a type 4 engine? A 2056?   May 8 2005, 10:55 PM
Type 4   No Type 1, just showing how with FI you get more p...   May 8 2005, 10:56 PM
bd1308   a T-1 making 230HP???? am i missing something?   May 8 2005, 10:58 PM
Type 4   No Type1's make alot more power than type4 due...   May 8 2005, 11:01 PM
bd1308   HOLY COW....don't they max out to 2056 or some...   May 8 2005, 11:05 PM
MattR   If T1s make more power, why do so many people go w...   May 8 2005, 11:06 PM
Aaron Cox   turbo?   May 8 2005, 11:06 PM
MattR   ...   May 8 2005, 11:09 PM
scott thacher   i would bet that is a 10 k mile engine, i wonder w...   May 8 2005, 11:12 PM
Aaron Cox   only street car i know of that is NA & ,akes more ...   May 8 2005, 11:18 PM
MattR   Yeah, I agree with scott. Its probably a drag mot...   May 8 2005, 11:18 PM
Mueller   I'm willing to bet the difference wouldn't...   May 8 2005, 11:34 PM
J P Stein   Golly, Honda, Ferrari, NASCAR, et al, have to spin...   May 9 2005, 05:43 AM
v82go   Mini Cooper S > 1598 cc = 168 hp @ 6000 rpm   May 9 2005, 07:10 AM
Mueller     May 9 2005, 08:05 AM
Tom Perso   Don't forget about the Toyota 4A-GZE motor. 1...   May 9 2005, 08:29 AM
MarkG   I replaced this winter the FI system (stock D-jet)...   May 9 2005, 10:31 AM
SirAndy   so steve, this dyno sheet is from one of your moto...   May 9 2005, 11:57 AM
lapuwali   Which ECU is, IMHO, not all that relevant, assumin...   May 9 2005, 02:49 PM
tnorthern     May 9 2005, 03:14 PM
SirAndy   <...   May 9 2005, 03:33 PM
ArtechnikA   <...   May 9 2005, 04:04 PM
jgiroux67   ...   May 9 2005, 04:33 PM
ArtechnikA   1974 Carrera RSR - 3,0 liters, 320 HP. 30 years a...   May 9 2005, 04:35 PM
lapuwali     May 9 2005, 05:33 PM
anthony   It would have been nice if he had done back to bac...   May 9 2005, 06:28 PM
grantsfo   ...   May 9 2005, 07:02 PM
Andyrew   They can do it with sbc's..... lol Remember J...   May 9 2005, 07:11 PM
Mueller     May 9 2005, 07:25 PM
ArtechnikA   one last road car number, for Porsche content: Ca...   May 9 2005, 09:34 PM
Jake Raby   The only way to solve this debate is with some gra...   May 9 2005, 09:36 PM
MattR   50 mpg? I hate to be a skeptic... but I'll be...   May 9 2005, 09:39 PM
Jake Raby   Thats the goal- 50 MPG... I have attained 40 fro...   May 9 2005, 09:55 PM
ArtechnikA     May 9 2005, 10:01 PM
SirAndy     May 9 2005, 10:05 PM
Jake Raby  
  May 9 2005, 10:11 PM
scott thacher   ...   May 9 2005, 10:14 PM
Jake Raby   The peak torque is the point where any engine has ...   May 9 2005, 10:24 PM
Aaron Cox  

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 5th June 2024 - 03:44 AM