Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Intake length vs torque, Just anthoer carb question No boobs
Joe Ricard
post May 18 2005, 02:03 PM
Post #21


CUMONIWANNARACEU
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 6,811
Joined: 5-January 03
From: Gautier, MS
Member No.: 92



So I have short intakes and 44IDF's with 38mm vents
How long of an intake should I go to with these carbs or should I go to 40 IDF's with 32 vents or 28 vents.

I have some longer runner intakes and the other carbs so it's just a matter of experimenting I guess.

2.0L Bus piston Web 86B portmatch intake and exhaust ports. 13lb flywheel Bursch SSI Car weighs 1965 lbs 205/50-15 Kumho V700 R tires.

Thought of playing with spacers under the carbs to get more length and maybe spacer under the common length velocity stack. Looking for more torque down lower to pull harder exiting the apex of tight AX turns.

Whose got the experience of really been there done that? great gains or don't bother.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
lapuwali
post May 18 2005, 05:46 PM
Post #22


Not another one!
****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 4,526
Joined: 1-March 04
From: San Mateo, CA
Member No.: 1,743



Nice theory. Wrong, but nice-sounding.

You can the below (which is very imperfect, and diagrams are really called for), or you can just look at any motorcycle made in the past 20 years. Bikes make power (lots of it: 150-160hp per liter is common) at high revs, and very little power at low revs. They also have very short intake tracts. The typicla car engine makes power much lower (like half the revs or less, and most don't break 100hp/liter, many are below 80hp/liter), and have long intake runners. Short = high revs, long = low revs.

Now, the treatise:

Intake length is tied to valve timing and engine speed, and only really makes a big difference with cams that produce lots of overlap.

You open the exhaust valve as the piston is about 80% of the way to BDC on the compression stroke, as you've extracted all of the useful energy from the pressure rise after combustion. This sets up a positive pressure wave out the exhaust and down the pipe. This wave keeps going until it hits a major change in section (like in the collector), where it reflects back up the pipe to the valve as a negative pressure wave. This helps to suck the burnt charge out through the open valve. The wave reflects again, and keeps travelling back and forth, diminishing in strength, until the next time the valve opens. A similar thing happens on the intake side, except the "sign" is reversed. A negative pressure wave travels up the tract until it hits open air (or the airbox), when it gets reflected back as a positive pressure wave.

In an engine with lots of valve overlap, the wave coming back in through the exhaust can travel across the cylinder and try to push the new charge (and some residual exhaust gases) back through the open intake valve. With ideal timing, the reflected intake wave will arrive at the valve just in time to prevent the exhaust wave from pushing any charge out the intake valve. With bad timing, the charge will be blown all the way back up the tract, only to be reflected back. With really bad timing, the intake valve will close before it can re-enter.

If you look at the torque curve on an engine with lots of overlap, you'll see a series of hills and valleys. The hills are where the timing works out, the valleys are where it doesn't. Typically, each hill is higher as the revs rise, and each valley is deeper, until the torque peak is reached, which generally happens about when the speed of sound is reached by the charge attempting to flow through the intake valve.

Less overlap smooths out the hills and valleys, but at the mean between the peaks and troughs, not at the tops of the hills. Changing the length of the intake and/or exhaust tracts also shifts the height and position of the hills and valleys. With variable length intake tracts, variable valve timing, and variable exhausts, you could conceivably smooth out the bumps with the torque peak up near the peaks, rather than at the mean. This is the sort of thing current F1 engines are using, which is how they're managing to get any kind of drivability with 20K rpm 3.0 engines. Most motorcycles do not have these kinds of toys, but they have the severe cam timing, so you end up with peaky engines that make very little power below (say) 5K rpm, and huge power above 9K rpm. Motorcycles make lots of power at high revs, and have very short intake tracts. Short = high revs. Long = low revs.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
Joe Ricard   Intake length vs torque   May 18 2005, 02:03 PM
Dr. Roger   Please correct me if i'm wrong anyone..... Ge...   May 18 2005, 03:25 PM
SirAndy   <...   May 18 2005, 04:18 PM
Aaron Cox   pull a move like mazda racing did- varying intake...   May 18 2005, 04:20 PM
SirAndy     May 18 2005, 04:26 PM
lapuwali   Andy's right. Long = low-end weighted power c...   May 18 2005, 04:40 PM
Dr. Roger   Well actually it's got way more than just inta...   May 18 2005, 05:00 PM
lapuwali   Nice theory. Wrong, but nice-sounding. You can t...   May 18 2005, 05:46 PM
jwalters   Yea, Andy is correct-- A good view of this in wor...   May 18 2005, 05:47 PM
Tom73   So why to make HP on a V8 do you use a "high rise"...   May 18 2005, 07:26 PM
Dr. Roger   That's right... http://www.91...   May 18 2005, 07:36 PM
Dr. Roger   OHHH CRAP! Why-oh-why will my hood not fit rig...   May 18 2005, 07:40 PM
Joe Ricard   Well I knew all that. But what I want is the recip...   May 18 2005, 07:43 PM
Joe Ricard     May 18 2005, 07:46 PM
SGB   Personal experience: really really short intake =...   May 18 2005, 07:49 PM
bondo   What I don't understand is why runner length w...   May 18 2005, 07:52 PM
scott thacher   i did get a ride in joe's car, with the except...   May 18 2005, 08:09 PM
Joe Ricard   Yea Scott, Your motor in my car and it would be pr...   May 18 2005, 08:15 PM
scott thacher   nope i have done almost nothing... got a new batte...   May 18 2005, 08:21 PM
messix   quick and dirty big and short= high rpm power ...   May 18 2005, 09:37 PM
Joe Ricard   OK Well I'm going to do it and then write down...   May 19 2005, 02:13 PM
JmuRiz   What was the thinking behind this type of setup......   May 20 2005, 08:32 AM
URY914     May 20 2005, 09:18 AM
kwales   Looks like organ pipes- each one tuned to a differ...   May 20 2005, 09:24 AM
don9146   Didn't Jake do a test of different length Webb...   May 20 2005, 09:30 AM
Dr. Roger   Excellent info. Quote: But there's also a per...   May 20 2005, 10:12 AM
Dr. Roger   Oh, on the Can Am thing... Those stacks were anot...   May 20 2005, 10:21 AM
bondo   So how DO you measure throttle response? That...   May 20 2005, 11:33 AM
JmuRiz   Great info on the ducati airbox design! The b...   May 20 2005, 11:44 AM
Dr. Roger   Hmmm, in my limited experiences with a few small b...   May 20 2005, 07:17 PM
Jake Raby   Due to the intake and exhaust port designs the TIV...   May 20 2005, 07:50 PM
lapuwali   Jake, I don't know where this "conventional w...   May 20 2005, 08:38 PM
J P Stein   From what I have read on the long stacks/short sta...   May 20 2005, 08:59 PM
Joe Ricard   Well the butt dyno tells me I have more torque low...   May 30 2005, 02:33 PM
Air_Cooled_Nut   ...   May 30 2005, 04:44 PM
messix   the stacks jake is using are doing nothing but smo...   May 30 2005, 10:18 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 2nd June 2024 - 10:59 AM