Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Intake length vs torque, Just anthoer carb question No boobs
Joe Ricard
post May 18 2005, 02:03 PM
Post #1


CUMONIWANNARACEU
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 6,811
Joined: 5-January 03
From: Gautier, MS
Member No.: 92



So I have short intakes and 44IDF's with 38mm vents
How long of an intake should I go to with these carbs or should I go to 40 IDF's with 32 vents or 28 vents.

I have some longer runner intakes and the other carbs so it's just a matter of experimenting I guess.

2.0L Bus piston Web 86B portmatch intake and exhaust ports. 13lb flywheel Bursch SSI Car weighs 1965 lbs 205/50-15 Kumho V700 R tires.

Thought of playing with spacers under the carbs to get more length and maybe spacer under the common length velocity stack. Looking for more torque down lower to pull harder exiting the apex of tight AX turns.

Whose got the experience of really been there done that? great gains or don't bother.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
Dr. Roger
post May 20 2005, 10:12 AM
Post #2


A bat out of hell.
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,944
Joined: 31-January 05
From: Hercules, California
Member No.: 3,533
Region Association: Northern California



Excellent info.

Quote:
But there's also a performance benefit because the airbox is a Helmholtz resonator. That is, a resonance effect occurs when you connect an enclosed volume of a suitable size and shape to an engine's intake stacks causing the air inside to resonate at a frequency that results in pressure peaks coincident with the cylinders' intake stroke frequency (at a particular RPM.) This can theoretically increase power by 10-15% within a particular RPM range by boosting airflow into the engine. Air boxes need to be well sealed and stiff in construction to maintain these resonance characteristics. A simple way to illustrate this is to blow across the mouth of an empty bottle. The sound you hear is the natural frequency of a Helmholtz resonator.

If you change the shape and free volume of the airbox, you change its resonance frequencies, and the engine RPM at which it responds to enhance filling the engine with air. For example, a larger Corse airbox is tuned for optimum filling a at higher RPM where race bikes normally operate, but street bikes usually do not.

An airbox also functions as a plenum, a space where the air velocity is reduced so as to eliminate turbulent air flow prior to being smoothed and accelerated down the velocity stacks. In fact, if you just place your finger anywhere near the edge of the top of the velocity stack you'll see dyno power drop off due to the disturbed air flow pattern.

The air in the plenum is also considered "free air." That is, its already passed through the air runners and filters so it can be supplied to the engine without any flow restriction. If you use the auto industry's standard calculation of air required for "nil" vacuum restriction within the air intake system, you should have at least 130% of engine capacity in available air volume between the throttle butterflies and the air filter element.

All of this tells us why Ducati places the Superbike air filters in the air runners. This location avoids lowering the frequency of the airbox (by not filling up a large portion of the airbox volume with a bulky foam filter) and prevents disturbing the airflow near the velocity stacks as well as improving throttle response by maintaining a large free air volume between the filter location and the velocity stacks.

This is also why Ducati didn't use over-the-velocity stack bellmouth style filter. This location doesn't meet that 1,300 cc. plenum volume needed to avoid degrading throttle response (which a dyno doesn't measure BTW.) Dyno tests say you get somewhat less peak horsepower with these filter types but on a stock bike they don't seem to make a lot of difference.

Another point to consider is that unless you have customized a FIM chip on a dyno in an attempt to match the flow and resonance characteristics of an over-the-bellmouth filter you'll have to use a chip that was developed using the stock filters.

The computerized engine management system uses a fixed fuel injection metering scheme controlled by the EPROM chip that was developed in combination with the stock intake/exhaust configuration. Unless you install a programmable FIM chip and sort out any changes on a dyno with a knowledgeable operator/programmer you won't get optimum (low-end?, midrange?, high-end?, power?, throttle response?) performance.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
Joe Ricard   Intake length vs torque   May 18 2005, 02:03 PM
Dr. Roger   Please correct me if i'm wrong anyone..... Ge...   May 18 2005, 03:25 PM
SirAndy   <...   May 18 2005, 04:18 PM
Aaron Cox   pull a move like mazda racing did- varying intake...   May 18 2005, 04:20 PM
SirAndy     May 18 2005, 04:26 PM
lapuwali   Andy's right. Long = low-end weighted power c...   May 18 2005, 04:40 PM
Dr. Roger   Well actually it's got way more than just inta...   May 18 2005, 05:00 PM
lapuwali   Nice theory. Wrong, but nice-sounding. You can t...   May 18 2005, 05:46 PM
jwalters   Yea, Andy is correct-- A good view of this in wor...   May 18 2005, 05:47 PM
Tom73   So why to make HP on a V8 do you use a "high rise"...   May 18 2005, 07:26 PM
Dr. Roger   That's right... http://www.91...   May 18 2005, 07:36 PM
Dr. Roger   OHHH CRAP! Why-oh-why will my hood not fit rig...   May 18 2005, 07:40 PM
Joe Ricard   Well I knew all that. But what I want is the recip...   May 18 2005, 07:43 PM
Joe Ricard     May 18 2005, 07:46 PM
SGB   Personal experience: really really short intake =...   May 18 2005, 07:49 PM
bondo   What I don't understand is why runner length w...   May 18 2005, 07:52 PM
scott thacher   i did get a ride in joe's car, with the except...   May 18 2005, 08:09 PM
Joe Ricard   Yea Scott, Your motor in my car and it would be pr...   May 18 2005, 08:15 PM
scott thacher   nope i have done almost nothing... got a new batte...   May 18 2005, 08:21 PM
messix   quick and dirty big and short= high rpm power ...   May 18 2005, 09:37 PM
Joe Ricard   OK Well I'm going to do it and then write down...   May 19 2005, 02:13 PM
JmuRiz   What was the thinking behind this type of setup......   May 20 2005, 08:32 AM
URY914     May 20 2005, 09:18 AM
kwales   Looks like organ pipes- each one tuned to a differ...   May 20 2005, 09:24 AM
don9146   Didn't Jake do a test of different length Webb...   May 20 2005, 09:30 AM
Dr. Roger   Excellent info. Quote: But there's also a per...   May 20 2005, 10:12 AM
Dr. Roger   Oh, on the Can Am thing... Those stacks were anot...   May 20 2005, 10:21 AM
bondo   So how DO you measure throttle response? That...   May 20 2005, 11:33 AM
JmuRiz   Great info on the ducati airbox design! The b...   May 20 2005, 11:44 AM
Dr. Roger   Hmmm, in my limited experiences with a few small b...   May 20 2005, 07:17 PM
Jake Raby   Due to the intake and exhaust port designs the TIV...   May 20 2005, 07:50 PM
lapuwali   Jake, I don't know where this "conventional w...   May 20 2005, 08:38 PM
J P Stein   From what I have read on the long stacks/short sta...   May 20 2005, 08:59 PM
Joe Ricard   Well the butt dyno tells me I have more torque low...   May 30 2005, 02:33 PM
Air_Cooled_Nut   ...   May 30 2005, 04:44 PM
messix   the stacks jake is using are doing nothing but smo...   May 30 2005, 10:18 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 9th June 2024 - 09:33 PM