![]() |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
![]() |
yarin |
![]()
Post
#1
|
'14-X'in FOOL ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 988 Joined: 13-May 03 From: Guttenberg, NJ Member No.: 693 Region Association: North East States ![]() |
I bought this nifty device, last one on the shelf already opened/returned but it doesn't have an insruction manual with it.
I hooked up + and - to the battery, and the green aligator clip to the negative side of the coil. With the car off it reads 60 on the 4 cyl scale. With the car running it reads 30? I moved the point closer to the rotor and it now reads 20 with the car running. Is this device messed up or is my dwell angle really messed up. |
![]() ![]() |
maf914 |
![]()
Post
#2
|
Not a Guru! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,049 Joined: 30-April 03 From: Central Florida Member No.: 632 Region Association: None ![]() ![]() |
I have an older Craftsman analyzer and it has worked well on the T4 with both points and the Crane breaker-less ignition I later installed. I hook it up as you describe and set it for 4-cylinder. I use it to set the idle speed and to check RPM when using a timing light. When I still had points I found the car ran better with the dwell set with the analyzer, as opposed to simply setting the point gap. It's been a long time since I had points, but I think the specified dwell required a point gap greater than that specified.
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 9th May 2025 - 02:11 PM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |