Four vs Six, comparison questions |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
Four vs Six, comparison questions |
johnmhudson111 |
Aug 16 2005, 09:02 AM
Post
#161
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 491 Joined: 29-November 04 From: Nesbit, MS Member No.: 3,191 |
I am sure ths has been discussed before but I couldn't find anything using the search. So, has there been a comparison done between a 911 six and big four, like Jake Raby's engines? Looking at:
1. Overall cost of engine (plus consideration of the cost of the conversion to a six from a four) 2. power hp/tq 3. engine life 4. other issues? |
grantsfo |
Aug 16 2005, 09:39 AM
Post
#162
|
Arrrrhhhh! Group: Members Posts: 4,327 Joined: 16-March 03 Member No.: 433 Region Association: None |
I have done extensive research on this subject. The 6 is the way to go in my opinion especially if you think you will ever bring the car out to the track. Regardless of the claims you hear the Type 4 is not up to the rigors of extensive track sessions if you want an engine that will last more than a season or two.
If resale value is a consideration regardless the reputation of a given type 4 engine the car wont hold same value as a 6 conversion. 6 conversion can be done very cost effectively when compared to a well bult big Type 4 such as the ones from Jake. If money doesnt mean anything to you then a big Type 4 is cool and Jake is one of the best around. I just cant justify the expense of a well built big type 4 when I look at the benfits and costs of going with a 6 conversion. |