Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Let's hug some trees, Emissions...how bad are these cars?
ehick72
post Oct 11 2005, 08:01 AM
Post #1


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 108
Joined: 28-December 04
From: Austin, Texas
Member No.: 3,356



I was reading an article on Mexico City banning the use of the Mexican VW bettle because of safety and emissions. That concerns me because I try to keep my 1.7 engine well tuned. I know my car is extremely fuel efficient but is it bad for the environment in another way? Does anyone know have any info on this?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
dmenche914
post Oct 12 2005, 06:35 AM
Post #2


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,212
Joined: 27-February 03
From: California
Member No.: 366



Hopefully the SF BAy area will adopt strict Denver like fire place restrictions. The problem is the air settles the smoke close to teh ground. many of the fire places are not efficient,a dn smoke the entire time. Folks also burn wet or green or other junk wood. Homes are on 5000 Sq ft lots. It is so bad that it causes difficulty in breathing. A thick blue to grey haze is all thru the nieghborhood.

It is crazy to make folks jump thru hoops to smog their cars, yet anyone is free to burn the stinkiest fire 24 hours a day. They problably don't even smell it anymore their so used to it. In a crowded suburban area, that has still wind days in the winter there is too much harm and discomfort done by wood burners. The benifit by switching to natural gas is so much for clean air, that even with the increase in gas cost, and assuming the wood is free, the cost of the smog produced is greater than that reduced per dollor in automobile smog tests. More bang for the buck I say for cleaner air. Just drop the car smog tests, and crack down on wood burners.

Country folks dont have nearby neighbors, so the effect of their burning wood is minimal, however it is still worse than running an old car.


Fancy wood pellet fireplaces, with reburners can burn much cleaner, but many folks don't have them.

Also if your into wanting to hug a tree it is better to keep the tree alive rather than chop it down to burn.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
ehick72   Let's hug some trees   Oct 11 2005, 08:01 AM
URY914   Since they were built before catalitic (sp) conver...   Oct 11 2005, 08:32 AM
Cap'n Krusty   The air quality in Mexico DF makes the worst smog ...   Oct 11 2005, 08:53 AM
914GT   Your car has much higher emissions than new cars d...   Oct 11 2005, 09:04 AM
Air_Cooled_Nut   My '75 L-jet teener passed emissions easily an...   Oct 11 2005, 09:21 AM
jsteele22   Keep in mind that "passing emissions" means that i...   Oct 11 2005, 09:40 AM
lapuwali   It's all relative. A typical car from the unr...   Oct 11 2005, 10:03 AM
TROJANMAN   so which is worse? a car that gets 30+ MPG with a...   Oct 11 2005, 10:09 AM
double-a   mine must be ok, when i had a tune-up done awhile ...   Oct 11 2005, 10:13 AM
Dr. Roger     Oct 11 2005, 10:17 AM
phantom914   ...   Oct 11 2005, 10:21 AM
Dr. Roger  
  Oct 11 2005, 10:22 AM
Dr. Roger   http://www.914world.com/bbs...   Oct 11 2005, 02:54 PM
BMartin914   ...   Oct 11 2005, 04:38 PM
dmenche914   Hopefully the SF BAy area will adopt strict Denver...   Oct 12 2005, 06:35 AM


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 6th July 2025 - 11:27 AM