![]() |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
![]() |
yarin |
![]()
Post
#1
|
'14-X'in FOOL ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 988 Joined: 13-May 03 From: Guttenberg, NJ Member No.: 693 Region Association: North East States ![]() |
Tonight I have completed building the main board for my MS II V.3.0 system. Thanks to those that have helped out. Once i'm all finished I will definitely post a complete "How To MegaSquirt a 914" website with pics and step by step. So far i'm still at the desk level. I've got 2.0 injection parts on the way.
I'll be using the following: stock injectors GM air temp sensor stock fuel pump summit racing manifold referenced fuel pressure regulator stock injectors (i think 2.0s are on the way) stock plenum / runners stock CHT MS Relay Board Innovative WB02 High Current ignition driver Stock dizzy with pertronix (hall sensor) Stock Bosch Blue Coil PWM Low impedence injector driver (no resistors) Stock Cold start Valve (plan so far) Stock throttle body with some junkyard TPS Here is a pic of my board, took me a few hours a night every night this week. I took my time, double checked everything. So far so good! I don't expect to have the system in the car for at least another month. I'm converting from carbs so I want to install steel fuel lines and clean some stuff up. I'll be sure to post progress in the forums. (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/smilie_pokal.gif) Attached image(s) ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
yarin |
![]()
Post
#2
|
'14-X'in FOOL ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 988 Joined: 13-May 03 From: Guttenberg, NJ Member No.: 693 Region Association: North East States ![]() |
Josh, Yes rising rate. Or in our case when the manifold is under vacuum the fuel pressure is regulated to ambient - vacuum. If the manifold is boosted, Fuel pressure increases proportionally. Unfortunately the latter condition doesn't come in to play for me (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/smile.gif)
From the MS site: "The vacuum referenced fuel pressure regulator is essential. It provides constant pressure differential between fuel at injector nozzle and manifold air pressure [port EFI] or atmospheric pressure [TBI]. This makes the injected fuel quantity solely a function of the injector open time. If you were to 'cap off' the manifold vacuum port on the fuel pressure regulator, you are reducing the dynamic range of the injectors. This means you will need lower pulse widths at at (giving less control over idle mixtures) and lower flow under boost (restricting the maximum horsepower). So, in general, for port injectors, have the fuel pressure regulator connected to the manifold vacuum is a good thing. There is very little reason not to do it (though some have argued against it for individual runner port EFI set-ups). " Since 2.0 injectors are rather large I was under the impression that I would run into minimum pulse width limitations at idle, therefore lowering the fuel pressure at idle would help. Correct? Or would PWM take care of those issues? Thanks |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 3rd July 2025 - 08:30 PM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |