Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> OT: Anyone use Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall?, ours is down, along with Barracuda support website and phone
BigDBass
post Jun 13 2006, 10:06 AM
Post #1


Dumb Question Champion
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,438
Joined: 11-January 06
From: Chicago (south 'burbs)
Member No.: 5,405
Region Association: Upper MidWest




Just wondering if any of the IT types here are using a Barracuda email firewall. We are, and normally love it, but this morning it stopped processing incoming mail and, frighteningly, the Barracudanetworks.com website is down and there is no answer on the phone... Anyone have a similar or different situation with their Barracuda today?

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
KaptKaos
post Jun 14 2006, 08:41 AM
Post #2


Family
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,009
Joined: 23-April 03
From: Near Wausau
Member No.: 607
Region Association: Upper MidWest



Before I was a MArshal partner, I was a Content Technologoies partner (then Baltimore, now Clearswift). I haven't looked at the MIMEsweeper products in years. When I last looked at them, they had issues with throughput. We have a major entertainment company with over 16k users running through basically 2 mailmarshals at the gateway. They not only get over 500k mail per day, but it is very very attachment heavy. Nothing else that they tried could handle their mail volume.

As for Real Time Black Lists (RBLs), while they do work, they are also very very problematic. Many times, they have false positive problems where domains get on their lists because the RBLs do not properly check for open relays. And once you are on their lists, it is nearly impossible to get off of them. These are basically unmanned list servers with no accountability. If your domain gets onto an RBL, you can expect several days worth of work to get off of their list.

IMO the real test of a gateway solution, aside from volume, is the false positive rate and end user management. If you have a low false positive rate and the ability for end-users to release their own junk mail and manage their own white and black lists, then you are doing pretty good.

Additionally, we used to put product on the internal systems too, but after a few years of it, we found that those were really only used for HR purposes as the gateway really did most of the work.

Just my 2 cents after being in the content security space for about 8 years.

BTW: Is David Guyatt still with Clearswift?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Steve Thacker
post Jun 14 2006, 10:43 AM
Post #3


UMMMPH Yea Baby Yea ! UMMMPH
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,089
Joined: 8-January 03
From: Pickerington, Ohio
Member No.: 113
Region Association: Upper MidWest



QUOTE(KaptKaos @ Jun 14 2006, 10:41 AM) *

Before I was a MArshal partner, I was a Content Technologoies partner (then Baltimore, now Clearswift). I haven't looked at the MIMEsweeper products in years. When I last looked at them, they had issues with throughput. We have a major entertainment company with over 16k users running through basically 2 mailmarshals at the gateway. They not only get over 500k mail per day, but it is very very attachment heavy. Nothing else that they tried could handle their mail volume.

As for Real Time Black Lists (RBLs), while they do work, they are also very very problematic. Many times, they have false positive problems where domains get on their lists because the RBLs do not properly check for open relays. And once you are on their lists, it is nearly impossible to get off of them. These are basically unmanned list servers with no accountability. If your domain gets onto an RBL, you can expect several days worth of work to get off of their list.

IMO the real test of a gateway solution, aside from volume, is the false positive rate and end user management. If you have a low false positive rate and the ability for end-users to release their own junk mail and manage their own white and black lists, then you are doing pretty good.

Additionally, we used to put product on the internal systems too, but after a few years of it, we found that those were really only used for HR purposes as the gateway really did most of the work.

Just my 2 cents after being in the content security space for about 8 years.

BTW: Is David Guyatt still with Clearswift?


Not sure on David Guyatt

I have very very few false positives with the 5.2 Mailsweeper. It is all a distributed design now and throughput is not an issue any longer. The RBL is no longer an issue either. The Receiver service is now a separate component and it has a section to whitelist/Safelist a known good sender, even if they are on a RBL. It also has PMM "Personal Message Manager" . Basically the users control their own mail. I just scan for bad images, profanity, etc.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
BigDBass   OT: Anyone use Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall?   Jun 13 2006, 10:06 AM
skline   It was all a scam to get many users and then shut...   Jun 13 2006, 10:13 AM
KaptKaos   That can't be good. I wonder how this is impa...   Jun 13 2006, 10:27 AM
BigDBass   Skline, I hope you're kidding? Joe, if you ch...   Jun 13 2006, 10:29 AM
BigDBass   Just got a call back from my Barracuda reseller. ...   Jun 13 2006, 10:33 AM
Brad Roberts   Let me know if I can help. We stopped selling Bar...   Jun 13 2006, 10:52 AM
BigDBass   My reseller found out :
  Jun 13 2006, 11:03 AM
KaptKaos   Never been a fan of tumbleweed, tho they tried to ...   Jun 13 2006, 11:11 AM
Steve Thacker   I use Clearswifts MailSweeper for SMTP. I also run...   Jun 13 2006, 11:36 AM
Brad Roberts   How many users? B   Jun 13 2006, 11:50 AM
Steve Thacker   Brad if the question was for me I have over 15k se...   Jun 13 2006, 11:58 AM
BigDBass   Moments after the fix was identified, the support ...   Jun 13 2006, 12:06 PM
Brad Roberts   Steve, that is a LOT of users! I would like t...   Jun 13 2006, 12:20 PM
Steve Thacker   Yea it is a lot of folks. A hair less than I had w...   Jun 13 2006, 01:07 PM
Part Pricer   It looks like their website was down because of a ...   Jun 14 2006, 07:30 AM
BigDBass   Even better: When I called and gave them a piece ...   Jun 14 2006, 07:39 AM
KaptKaos   Before I was a MArshal partner, I was a Content Te...   Jun 14 2006, 08:41 AM
Steve Thacker  

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 2nd June 2024 - 04:26 AM