![]() |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
![]() |
DanT |
![]()
Post
#1
|
Going back to the Dark Side! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,300 Joined: 4-October 04 From: Auburn, CA Member No.: 2,880 Region Association: None ![]() |
anyone built a 2.0L with D-jet using one of these cams?
Like the results? Hated it? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/blink.gif) |
![]() ![]() |
Scott-thundercat |
![]()
Post
#2
|
Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 159 Joined: 16-October 06 From: Reno, NV Member No.: 7,049 ![]() |
QUOTE Wonder if the constant attacks on anything "nonRaby" ever cease? confused24.gif Admins now that we have paid banner ads from 914club sponsors can we have a rule where suppliers cant bash other suppliers? It just seems very unprofessional to me. All us customers are more than capable of bashing poor quality providers. +1. from all i've heard Raby's cams kick ass, but i think someone was just asking about using an Elgin cam... to me it seems like you could lose potential customers by so agressively defending your product (which by all reports IS excellent)... i think it's one thing if you post a dyno sheet of X engine with Raby cam, X engine with Elgin cam- all else equal... then it's fair game... but until then, it just sounds like trying to prove yours is better over the internet... what's that saying about fighting on the net? my .02 |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 11th May 2025 - 11:03 AM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |