Hydraulic vs solid cam for weekend cruiser, Pros and con |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
Hydraulic vs solid cam for weekend cruiser, Pros and con |
914Sixer |
Feb 25 2007, 09:09 PM
Post
#1
|
914 Guru Group: Members Posts: 8,906 Joined: 17-January 05 From: San Angelo Texas Member No.: 3,457 Region Association: Southwest Region |
I know that the hydraulic is frowned on. All of the later type 4 motors went this route. Even the last Type 1 Beetles from Mexico went there too! The newest 911 are hydraulic.
I am not going racing just crusing in my 73 2.0. I know the power band is different but most of the driving will be under 4500 rpm. I plan on running some modified Hoffman AMC 2.0 heads, 94mm Euro pistons, 1.7 rockers with 911 swivel feet, solid rocker spacers and stock FI. Nothing exotic. |
anthony |
Feb 25 2007, 11:01 PM
Post
#2
|
2270 club Group: Benefactors Posts: 3,107 Joined: 1-February 03 From: SF Bay Area, CA Member No.: 218 |
So for a weekend cruiser you are trying to save yourself 20 minutes a year on a valve adjustment?
The hydro is frowned upon because the cam is a big compromise in hp and torque. Get a Raby 9550 cam. |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 9th June 2024 - 08:46 PM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |