Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> how large can you go on a 2.0
ne14914
post Mar 17 2003, 11:43 PM
Post #1


Me N My914
**

Group: Members
Posts: 94
Joined: 4-March 03
From: Los Angeles, Cali (Inland Empire)
Member No.: 388



How large can you build a 2.0 motor and still use it as a reliable daily driver?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
Dave Cawdrey
post Mar 18 2003, 04:08 PM
Post #2


Dumbo going poop, Daddy :)
***

Group: Members
Posts: 818
Joined: 22-January 03
From: Seattle, WA USA
Member No.: 182



QUOTE(Mark Henry @ Mar 18 2003, 05:41 AM)
78mm X 96mm is the largest you can you build a 2.0 motor and still use it as a reliable daily driver.

Dave if you are going with a 78mm crank get one with type 1 (beetle) rod journals. Not only are T4 rods heavy but they're very short (rod angle) as well. You can use modified T1 rods or any of the aftermarket T1 longer rods. This will give you greater flexablity on the design of your engine.
You will also have to use a small (22mm) pin piston like the 96mm or some guys have used a 94mm T1 piston on a T4 jugg.
Good luck, Mark

I already got H-beams w/ chevy journals and bushed for 22 pins. My 94's are cut for longer (78) stroke. I was considering the T 1 stuff when this stuff (P's & rods) was brought to my attenion... Thanks for yer ideas, tho
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
ne14914   how large can you go on a 2.0   Mar 17 2003, 11:43 PM
Brad Roberts   I'm really starting to like the idea of the 78...   Mar 17 2003, 11:59 PM
Dave Cawdrey   I'm going with 78/94... We'll see how it ...   Mar 18 2003, 12:11 AM
Brad Roberts   Dave, what does that work out to be CC wise ?? So...   Mar 18 2003, 12:24 AM
Dave Cawdrey   Dont know off hand... Cant remember the formula ...   Mar 18 2003, 12:28 AM
Dave Cawdrey   All this talk 'bout IQ's, but no formula? ...   Mar 18 2003, 01:11 AM
Brad Roberts   Sorry. I was reading CNN. BoreXBoreXstrokeX3.14X4...   Mar 18 2003, 01:19 AM
Dave Cawdrey   I was thinkin 2175 (close) Thanks B- Bore x Bore...   Mar 18 2003, 01:23 AM
Mark Henry   How to calculate engine cc's Bore (mm) X bore...   Mar 18 2003, 07:19 AM
Mark Henry   78mm X 96mm is the largest you can you build a 2.0...   Mar 18 2003, 07:41 AM
ne14914   using 78mmx98mm = 2354cc, if I did my math correct...   Mar 18 2003, 02:06 PM
vortrex   hmm I don't know but that seems kinda large to...   Mar 18 2003, 02:09 PM
Bleyseng   For a daily driver a 2056cc is the ticket as you c...   Mar 18 2003, 02:24 PM
Dave Cawdrey  

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 10th June 2024 - 10:31 AM