Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> one cure for small chamber syndrome, something I whipped up
brer
post Jan 18 2008, 11:08 AM
Post #1


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,555
Joined: 10-March 05
From: san diego
Member No.: 3,736
Region Association: None



I'm working on a head program for guy here in SD. He had a similar problem I believe a member here had, and that was his chambers were too small for his 2056cc engine. (edited, he's using a 71mm crank and 96mm slugs)

Facing large barrel shimming, which he didn't want, I worked this up for him.

perfect 60cc chambers, his non 2.0L heads will now install with a .045 shim , he has a zero deck, giving (I believe) a 8.5:1 compression ratio.

This method of modifying heads results in perfectly matched chambers (and ports for him), so when he gets them back they will technically be blueprinted to within .001".

not a 2.0L head granted, but thats sometin else and this is within his budget.


Attached image(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
2-OH!
post Jan 24 2008, 02:02 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 552
Joined: 17-October 03
From: Santa Clarita, Kalifornication
Member No.: 1,253



brer:

With that much meat removed, and the history of cracking around the spark plug holes, how do you think that configuration will hold up...Particularly if you open up the valve sizes...

Also, will that much removed, how will it effect the valve/rocker geometry...It would appear that the valve stems will clear the other side of the guide by quite a bit more...

2-OH!

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
brer
post Jan 24 2008, 02:57 PM
Post #3


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,555
Joined: 10-March 05
From: san diego
Member No.: 3,736
Region Association: None



QUOTE(2-OH! @ Jan 24 2008, 12:02 PM) *

brer:

With that much meat removed, and the history of cracking around the spark plug holes, how do you think that configuration will hold up...Particularly if you open up the valve sizes...

Also, will that much removed, how will it effect the valve/rocker geometry...It would appear that the valve stems will clear the other side of the guide by quite a bit more...

2-OH!



Spark plug depth on these heads hasn't changed, only the angle of deviation either side of the plug hole. These 1.7L heads are not as prone to cracking due to the fact that there is more material around the plug to act as a heat sink... this head still has a large bulk of alloy, more than a 2L, around that hole.

The flat area of the chamber had less than .003" removed so your valve height will remain identical to stock... depending on the valve job you put on it of course, so rocker geometry with not change any more than a regular head rebuild which is nearly nothing.

This head gains cc's by pushing down along the lower edge (similar to the 2.0), opening up several millimeters next to each valve and bowing back at the plug. more prone to cracking than a 2.0 head? Don and I discussed that and he feels this will not alter its lifespan much in relation to its performance.

whats important is factoring the cost of a cherry set of 1.7 cores in relation to the performance gains.
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/shades.gif)







User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
brer   one cure for small chamber syndrome   Jan 18 2008, 11:08 AM
Jake Raby   Looks like that chamber would have interesting que...   Jan 18 2008, 12:02 PM
brer   I figured someone would have seen the design befor...   Jan 18 2008, 12:22 PM
Jake Raby   I consider that a perfect chamber volume for a w...   Jan 18 2008, 12:25 PM
Phoenix 914-6GT   I just thought that people who have small chamber ...   Jan 18 2008, 12:56 PM
lotus_65   I just thought that people who have small chamber...   Feb 23 2008, 08:11 AM
brer   44x38 valves.   Jan 18 2008, 03:14 PM
brer   2 revisions later, this is how they look...   Jan 23 2008, 11:28 PM
sean_v8_914   ...major wood..oh wait, thats metal.   Jan 24 2008, 12:33 PM
brer   i'll bring it along to your gig sean. open th...   Jan 24 2008, 01:31 PM
2-OH!   brer: With that much meat removed, and the histor...   Jan 24 2008, 02:02 PM
brer   brer: With that much meat removed, and the histo...   Jan 24 2008, 02:57 PM
brer   Since jake mentioned it, and out of curiosity I ca...   Jan 28 2008, 09:55 PM
Jake Raby   And the spark plugs are .100" closer to the c...   Jan 28 2008, 10:13 PM
brer   forgive me for repeating things other people tell ...   Jan 28 2008, 10:27 PM
brer   I've been playing with video and thought I...   Feb 22 2008, 11:41 PM
alpha434   Lol. Your machinist. Who is he?   Feb 23 2008, 08:21 AM
brer   Hi Alpha. :wavebye: I built the models, I bui...   Feb 23 2008, 10:20 AM
brer   I hope you're laughing at the jokes and not my...   Feb 23 2008, 10:45 AM
brer   I should give kudos to this special tool Don makes...   Feb 23 2008, 03:17 PM
Jake Raby   That tool is in my box too... Its made by the guys...   Feb 23 2008, 06:56 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 9th June 2024 - 04:46 AM