![]() |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
![]() |
ChrisFoley |
![]()
Post
#1
|
I am Tangerine Racing ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 7,986 Joined: 29-January 03 From: Bolton, CT Member No.: 209 Region Association: None ![]() ![]() |
I like to work with original components as much as possible, tweaking them as needed and only replacing them when creating something from scratch makes it easier to accomplish my goal.
For a long time I've believed that the stock filter bypass may cause problems when a sandwich plate adapter is installed for a remote oil cooler. Just by feel, it seems that the spring is too soft and allows the valve to begin opening at a fairly low differential pressure. I think a remote cooler circuit might have enough pressure drop that that the differential exceeds the cracking pressure of the valve, causing the oil to bypass both the filter and the cooler, contributing to a hot running engine in spite of the remote cooler. Full flow modifications that ensure all the oil goes thru the filter and remote cooler all the time are popular but I'm not really in favor of eliminating the stock filter by tapping into the front of the case or using a pump cover with a fitting. In the past I've disabled the bypass in the stock mount by replacing the spring and ball with a solid plug. However, IMO the full flow mod has a significant shortcoming. A couple years ago we had a cam/lifter failure in a customer's engine and the fine metal debris quickly clogged the filter to the point that the engine lost oil pressure. When we opened the filter, the element had collapsed from the pump pressure. Someone else had previously disabled the bypass to make a full flow system but if the bypass had been functional, at least the engine would have maintained oil pressure and the damage might have been less severe. So I've decided that rather than disabling the bypass, a modification to increase the cracking pressure is more desirable. My first plan was to measure the stock opening pressure using air, but I discovered that the valve in the filter mount I was testing leaked even when applying air pressure to the back side of the valve. So rather than making a direct measurement I disassembled a bypass valve and measured the spring force at the installed length using a small digital scale. By my calculations, the cracking pressure is very close to 5 psi. At least that's higher than I imagined it might be. But I still think a remote cooler circuit could have greater than 5psi pressure drop at higher flow rates, especially if small diameter hoses are used. I thought I would replace the spring with a heavier one, but looking at a listing of available springs, I didn't find anything that was just right. Instead I made a shim for the stock spring that roughly doubles the cracking pressure. I made a new press fit retainer for the assembly and re-installed the stock bypass, modified to open at more like 10psi. That should be enough to keep the valve closed under most operating conditions. If the filter gets plugged, there will be a pressure drop of 10 psi which will cause the oil light to go on at idle but at least the bearings will still get oil at higher rpms. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 9th May 2025 - 01:12 PM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |