Webcam Camshaft Question, Engine / Head Longevity: 494 vs 86a |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
Webcam Camshaft Question, Engine / Head Longevity: 494 vs 86a |
aggiezig |
Feb 7 2017, 11:38 PM
Post
#1
|
Porsche Wannabe Group: Members Posts: 319 Joined: 13-January 16 From: Los Angeles, CA Member No.: 19,557 Region Association: Southern California |
Howdy World,
I've been lurking through some old threads to find that the two most recommended Webcams out there for a mild / street engine are the 86a and 494. What I can't seem to determine is what the long-term wear & tear would be. I know the 494 is a quicker ramping cam that would be harder on the valvetrain... but is it enough of an issue to go for the 86a instead? Also, the 494 has more lift than the 86a - will both still work with single HD springs? If it helps, I am planning to run whichever cam in a 2056 with stock 2.0L heads. Thanks in advance for any advice! |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 10th June 2024 - 09:19 AM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |