Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Gas mileage Q:better/worse/same if N/A or turbo?, same size motor and HP rating
Mueller
post Dec 20 2005, 03:18 PM
Post #1


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 17,146
Joined: 4-January 03
From: Antioch, CA
Member No.: 87
Region Association: None



Let's say we have 2 engines of the same model from a manufacture, same size and HP rating (let's say 2.3L with 160hp)

One is turbocharged

the other is Normally Aspirated

It seems that under normal driving conditions (just cruising on the highway) the turbocharged engine would be better since it does not have to have as aggressive camshafts or compression as the N/A motor

at WOT, both should be sucking down the same amount of fuel...or possibly the turbo would be using more fuel to enrichen the mixture since a lean condition would be more fatal????

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
Mueller   Gas mileage Q:better/worse/same if N/A or turbo?   Dec 20 2005, 03:18 PM
sanman   my brother had a twin turbo 300zx always complaine...   Dec 20 2005, 03:23 PM
Andyrew   One engine is like a E production engine? where it...   Dec 20 2005, 03:34 PM
tat2dphreak   why would the turbo have the same hp rating? or is...   Dec 20 2005, 03:50 PM
Mueller   <...   Dec 20 2005, 03:52 PM
Mueller  

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 3rd June 2024 - 01:17 AM