Gas mileage Q:better/worse/same if N/A or turbo?, same size motor and HP rating |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
Gas mileage Q:better/worse/same if N/A or turbo?, same size motor and HP rating |
Mueller |
Dec 20 2005, 03:18 PM
Post
#1
|
914 Freak! Group: Members Posts: 17,146 Joined: 4-January 03 From: Antioch, CA Member No.: 87 Region Association: None |
Let's say we have 2 engines of the same model from a manufacture, same size and HP rating (let's say 2.3L with 160hp)
One is turbocharged the other is Normally Aspirated It seems that under normal driving conditions (just cruising on the highway) the turbocharged engine would be better since it does not have to have as aggressive camshafts or compression as the N/A motor at WOT, both should be sucking down the same amount of fuel...or possibly the turbo would be using more fuel to enrichen the mixture since a lean condition would be more fatal???? |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 3rd June 2024 - 01:17 AM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |