Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> CV joint question, subaru conversion related
jamara
post Jul 24 2006, 03:41 PM
Post #1


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 63
Joined: 27-February 06
From: LA, CA
Member No.: 5,645



This may be a dumb question, but does submitting CV joints to more than usual angles (as when altering a trans original mounting location) do anything to shorten the life of the CV or reduce its strength? I recognize that the design of the CV is to supply “constant velocity” at significant angles, as when turning sharply in a fwd vehicle. But what if the angle were a constant 20 degrees (or more??) all the time? Just a thought. I am considering a soobie engine conversion and am weighing the pros and cons of the fwd (2wd) soobie trans. Pros are – no adapter plate, relatively inexpensive replacement and performance parts, optimal gearing for the soobie motor, etc. Cons are - long ass behind the axles, custom axles needed (maybe not a con if they could be made stronger), and custom trans mounts (a minor issue given the overall complexity). The other cons, which actually are not cons in my mind, are hydraulic clutch and cable shifter. Since these were in the works for me anyway, it’s just another good reason to do it.

Anyway, it’s the length of the trans that troubles me, but given how short the soobie motor is, the whole thing could be moved forward considerably if the CV’s would not mind the angle. Since the axles need to be custom, making them a little longer would not be an issue. So, how far forward would be too far, in terms of CV life and reliability? Also, it just occurred to me that there could be negative ramifications for the suspension under hard acceleration if the geometry were too off. Yes, no? Thoughts… opinions ?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
jamara   CV joint question   Jul 24 2006, 03:41 PM
Cloudbuster   Here's my SWAG. After seeing the kinds of CV ...   Jul 24 2006, 04:22 PM
jamara  

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 4th July 2025 - 08:11 PM