![]() |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
![]() |
brer |
![]()
Post
#1
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,555 Joined: 10-March 05 From: san diego Member No.: 3,736 Region Association: None ![]() |
The FSM has a note to watch for tight or "perfect" fit in the bearing dowel pins.
I'm wondering how loosy or tighty these little buggers are best at? Mine move a little in the three large mains and kinda loosy in the case at the nose bearing. So are we needing a specific fit here or what? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/huh.gif) fit in the bearing halves (mahle) is not snug at all. I bolted the halves together today without the cam gear and the crank seems nice and smooth. The rod for #3 was plastiguaged and came up at .0015 or so, but its bloody impossible to keep the bloomin' rod still while torqueing it. So I'm not sure its totally accurate. After installing the rod on the crank it would fall on its own weight but kind of quick, not smooth and slow. After I check the deck height I'm thinking maybe i'll take that guy off and fiddle. Cam is snug, I think the axial play is to little.... >.001 Adams Ave. Roots and Blues is happenning down the street, so I had some swinging bluegrass to listen to all day. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/aktion035.gif) |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 15th June 2024 - 06:24 PM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |