|
|

|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
| GeorgeRud |
Jun 1 2010, 08:46 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,725 Joined: 27-July 05 From: Chicagoland Member No.: 4,482 Region Association: Upper MidWest |
Are there any members that have converted their larger engined flat 6 or V8 conversion cars to a hydraulic clutch? I tried a search, but couldn't find too much information. My problem is a very bad left knee that is not getting better (at least until I get a knee replacement done), and a very stiff clutch pedal on my 915 gearbox. Mine is one of the early ones without the spring assist, so it is not easy to hold the clutch in without seeing stars!
Does the hydraulic conversion make the clutch effort any easier? My factory six has much lighter clutch actuation , but I need to do something to lighten the force needed to actuate the clutch in my conversion car. If someone has the correct bores and stokes needed for the hydraulic conversion (or perhaps the actual parts to use), that would be very helpful. I'm hoping that someone has gone down this road and can give me some feedback! Thanks in advance for any advice. |
| Bruce Hinds |
Jun 1 2010, 09:03 PM
Post
#2
|
|
V-8 madness ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 763 Joined: 27-December 06 From: Port Orchard, WA Member No.: 7,391 Region Association: Pacific Northwest |
I had one of the early renegade V8 kits and the clutch was a bear. I put up with it for a long time and many years later Kennedy came out with a nice clutch package that my little wife could even work. It's Porsche unit.... my kit uses the 914 flywheel. The hydrolic package would be nice, but this would be pretty simple.
|
| brp986s |
Jun 1 2010, 09:59 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 434 Joined: 27-September 07 From: los angeles Member No.: 8,167 |
The clutch on my 915 wevo is piece o' cake. I got a '75 911 pedal cluster and the omega contraption in back. Bit of a pita and a puzzle setting it up at first. The '75 and '76 911 pedal clusters have a spring that forces the clutch pedal down instead of up. I wonder why it wouldn't be possible to update your set up. On the other hand, I've heard of the early style 915 "long arm" wasn't that heavy either. Is it just your knee?
I've been told that you have to match front and back. Meaning, the throw of the pedal lever has to be matched with with whatever actuation was used on the gearbox. If you got it wrong your pedal travel will be short, but the effort high. You can get it wrong the other way such that the pedal travel is long and light, but the clutch may not disengage. |
| GeorgeRud |
Jun 1 2010, 10:08 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,725 Joined: 27-July 05 From: Chicagoland Member No.: 4,482 Region Association: Upper MidWest |
The pedal assembly I am using is the original '73 914 one, and the transmission is a '75 915, backdated to a 74 lever arm (the '75 one had the strange clutch cable that wrapped around the outer part of the arm to clear the crossover exhaust pipe of the '75 911. I may have to see if there is a difference in the pedal cluster from the 914 and 911 of those years.
It does shift fine, so there is no problem engaging or disengaging the clutch other than the effort required. |
| ClayPerrine |
Jun 2 2010, 05:51 AM
Post
#5
|
|
Life's been good to me so far..... ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 16,542 Joined: 11-September 03 From: Hurst, TX. Member No.: 1,143 Region Association: NineFourteenerVille
|
Contact Rich Johnson (a914guy@aol.com). He has been selling kits for hydraulic clutch conversions for years. Has one on his 3.0L. The same kit is installed on Richard Fisher's Brodix v-8 powered 914.
|
| mipstien |
Jun 2 2010, 09:46 AM
Post
#6
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 261 Joined: 6-April 10 From: Maryville, TN Member No.: 11,576 Region Association: South East States |
Anyone got a kit for a stock 914? Would be kinda nice although this cable clutch is the closest I've felt to a hydraulic before
|
| turboman808 |
Jun 2 2010, 09:56 AM
Post
#7
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,718 Joined: 31-January 06 From: North Jersey Member No.: 5,505 Region Association: North East States |
No ones ever mentioned it, maybe because it's alot of money. Wevo makes a real nice hydraulic clutch conversion.
Probably get this myself some day. http://www.wevo.com/Products/ClutchProduct...s-Superlite.htm |
| Katmanken |
Jun 2 2010, 07:58 PM
Post
#8
|
|
You haven't seen me if anybody asks... ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,738 Joined: 14-June 03 From: USA Member No.: 819 Region Association: Upper MidWest |
Not sure why your pedal is too stiff. I have a thought.
One is you might have a diaphragm type heavy duty clutch for whatever large engine you are running. Had a LUK 200mm diaphragm clutch in my Ghia and it was a bear. Couldn't make it slip but it was so hard to push that it ate a clutch cable a year, and broke three clutch pedals. But, it handled all the power from the monster engine and when it engaged, it laid rubber in two gears without any slip. If you have a stiff diaphragm clutch like the LUK, you can get a softer pedal by keeping the clutch and going with a smaller clutch master cylinder or a larger diameter slave cylinder. The force applied to the pedal will be less, BUT the tradeoff is the pedal travel must increase. It's work in = work out where work is force times distance and the equation must balance. So, your solutions are a new softer clutch that is easier to deflect (ie requires less work to actuate) OR keep the clutch and use a smaller piston in the front clutch master cylinder or a larger slave cylinder to produce the necessary work with less force/ longer pedal travel. That's it for alternate choices. Hope that helps. Ken |
| PRS914-6 |
Jun 2 2010, 08:23 PM
Post
#9
|
|
Excellence Magazine Project 914 3.6 ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Retired Members Posts: 1,278 Joined: 20-May 06 From: Central California Member No.: 6,031 Region Association: None |
You can see my hydraulic clutch conversion HERE
A hydraulic system makes very little difference in effort. You gain some improvement from the reduction of friction, not hydraulics. It does make it significantly smoother. The reason is that to get easier you have to use a smaller master cylinder with a larger slave. That won't work. You need the same amount of movement as the cable provided and that means close to 1:1 MC:Slave. Bottom line, don't expect a big reduction in effort. |
| IronHillRestorations |
Jun 2 2010, 09:10 PM
Post
#10
|
|
I. I. R. C. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 6,926 Joined: 18-March 03 From: West TN Member No.: 439 Region Association: None
|
I wonder if you can just use the anular hydraulic throw out bearing/slave, with the set up like Paul's?
|
| Larry.Hubby |
Jun 3 2010, 12:04 AM
Post
#11
|
|
Member who doesn't post much, but has a long time in 914s ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 191 Joined: 24-November 04 From: Palo Alto, CA Member No.: 3,172 Region Association: Northern California |
This thread talks about some of the hydraulic conversions people have done, including mine:
http://www.914world.com/bbs2/index.php?sho...c=90342&hl= I have a 3.0 six with a 915 transmission in my car, but it's a '78 engine and trans, so I do have the over-center helper spring on the throwout mechanism at the transmission, and I added the helper spring down at the pedals as well to stay as close to stock as possible. The mechanical advantage can't be increased beyond stock without shortening the travel of the throwout lever, so I doubt you will get much relief from doing that before you run into inadequate clutch travel. |
| ArtechnikA |
Jun 3 2010, 05:45 AM
Post
#12
|
|
rich herzog ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 7,390 Joined: 4-April 03 From: Salted Roads, PA Member No.: 513 Region Association: None |
No ones ever mentioned it, maybe because it's alot of money. Wevo makes a real nice hydraulic clutch conversion. http://www.wevo.com/Products/ClutchProduct...s-Superlite.htm One reason is that the 5" Tilton clutches are race clutches and don't like slipping. This is fine for a race car but a PITA for a street car... I'd consider this myself if they ever made street-friction clutch disks... |
| turboman808 |
Jun 3 2010, 09:05 AM
Post
#13
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,718 Joined: 31-January 06 From: North Jersey Member No.: 5,505 Region Association: North East States |
No ones ever mentioned it, maybe because it's alot of money. Wevo makes a real nice hydraulic clutch conversion. http://www.wevo.com/Products/ClutchProduct...s-Superlite.htm One reason is that the 5" Tilton clutches are race clutches and don't like slipping. This is fine for a race car but a PITA for a street car... I'd consider this myself if they ever made street-friction clutch disks... Seems like the only option that may make it easier to to press the clutch. I have to imagine the hydralic part could be bought alone and made to fit something. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif) |
| Don M |
Jun 3 2010, 10:03 PM
Post
#14
|
|
Newbie ![]() Group: Members Posts: 41 Joined: 22-August 09 From: California Member No.: 10,707 Region Association: None |
found this image on a VW site, check it out
http://i453.photobucket.com/albums/qq253/4.../hydclutch2.jpg |
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 2nd April 2026 - 08:32 AM |
| All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
|
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |