Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

7 Pages V « < 3 4 5 6 7 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> 2.0 stock(ish) rebuild, Initial carb jetting
Valy
post Apr 2 2013, 10:42 AM
Post #81


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,677
Joined: 6-April 10
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Member No.: 11,573
Region Association: Northern California



The measurement you should care about is the axial play of the gears. I see some wear marks in the cap but you need to check how deep are those marks.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
AE354803
post Apr 2 2013, 10:47 AM
Post #82


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 238
Joined: 13-August 12
From: Southern California
Member No.: 14,801
Region Association: Southern California



I can really only measure axial movement for the driving gear after it's assembled due to the design of the pump. There was no perceivable play in it while assembled though. The "grooves" are basically just scratches, not of any significant depth but they can be felt with a fingernail.

I'm contemplating assembling it with a bit of lapping compound on the gear to housing mating surface and lapping it for a little. The would be a last chance effort and only if I had a suitable replacement pump in hand, just incase. I want to see if it can be refurbished.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Valy
post Apr 2 2013, 12:48 PM
Post #83


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,677
Joined: 6-April 10
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Member No.: 11,573
Region Association: Northern California



Lapping compound can't do any good. If you insist, you need to remove the idle axle and flycut the surface to make it straight but I think you're as it is now. Then... it will be prone to idle axle failure.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
AE354803
post Apr 3 2013, 12:55 AM
Post #84


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 238
Joined: 13-August 12
From: Southern California
Member No.: 14,801
Region Association: Southern California



What brand of bearings are the most reliable?

Connecting rods: Kolbenschmidt vs Mahle
Mains: Mahle vs Silverline

(does STD/STD/STD vs .10/STD/STD mean that the ID (crank) is 0.1" under? or case is 0.1" under? I'm guessing it's ID/OD/WIDTH)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
VaccaRabite
post Apr 3 2013, 08:49 AM
Post #85


En Garde!
**********

Group: Admin
Posts: 13,845
Joined: 15-December 03
From: Dallastown, PA
Member No.: 1,435
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



There are those who will disagree with me and say that this is a job easily done at home, but it is to your advantage to have a machinist tell you what bearings you need set bearing tolerance.

In a T4 it's hard to use plastigauge on all the bearings as the are not all split. Your machinist will also be better equipped to make changes needed to have bearings fit properly.

Buying the correct size bearings is only part of the puzzle.
Are you sure your case is still perfectly aligned? what about the crank?
Do you know the case mods needed to change bearing tolerance (and have the equipment to do it?

There is a lot of engine work can be done at home. But there are reasons why even the pros use machinists for parts of a build.
Zach
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Valy
post Apr 3 2013, 02:25 PM
Post #86


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,677
Joined: 6-April 10
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Member No.: 11,573
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(AE354803 @ Apr 2 2013, 11:55 PM) *

What brand of bearings are the most reliable?

Connecting rods: Kolbenschmidt vs Mahle
Mains: Mahle vs Silverline

(does STD/STD/STD vs .10/STD/STD mean that the ID (crank) is 0.1" under? or case is 0.1" under? I'm guessing it's ID/OD/WIDTH)

Sometimes yes.
I found that some sellers mix the measurements.
Anyway, T4 bearings are only available in different crank and case journals so the 3rd measurement (thrust) is always STD. The case is only STD or +.5mm. Crank is available in -0.25mm jumps.
So the .10 you see is -.25mm on the crank.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
AE354803
post Apr 13 2013, 04:53 PM
Post #87


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 238
Joined: 13-August 12
From: Southern California
Member No.: 14,801
Region Association: Southern California



Got the heads back, installed the solid spacers while I have free time. Waiting on the case and rods, once bearings come in it's time to rebuild.

Does anyone know the ID of a new crank timing gear? I have a used one with 1.65225" ID


New shaft is 1.6540" and the Tom Wilson book says interference is supposed to be 0.004" so I'm a little low at .00175".

I've seen new gears on AA for $85, I've found a pile for type 1/3's but I don't think its the same part #

Although aircooled's type 4 dist gear is on 1200-1600 engines and their steel timing gear is for 1200-1600 cc engines also, seems like it should be the same part, just different numbers.
http://vwparts.aircooled.net/Distributor-D...111-105-223.htm
http://vwparts.aircooled.net/Crankshaft-Ti...3-105-209oe.htm
AA has the dist gear as 901 102 115 00 (aircooled has 111-105-223) and crank gear as 021 105 209 A (aircooled 1200-1600 cc has 113-105-209)

I'm thinking that since the dist gear fits the same shaft, so long as it has the same amount of teeth the crank gear should be the same (assuming same gear dimensions)

Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
AE354803
post Apr 30 2013, 08:39 PM
Post #88


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 238
Joined: 13-August 12
From: Southern California
Member No.: 14,801
Region Association: Southern California



I'm rebuilding the oil pump in preparation for short block assembly this weekend.

I can't find the torque for the 4 bolts on the rear (inside the case) of the type 4 pump. Check haynes, 914 handbook and Tom Wilson book with no luck.

Anyone know this torque spec?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
pilothyer
post Apr 30 2013, 09:33 PM
Post #89


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 838
Joined: 21-May 08
From: N. Alabama
Member No.: 9,080
Region Association: South East States



Oil pump to crankcase nuts 14 ft lb according to:
http://www.tunacan.net/t4/reference/torque.htm
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
pilothyer
post Apr 30 2013, 09:34 PM
Post #90


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 838
Joined: 21-May 08
From: N. Alabama
Member No.: 9,080
Region Association: South East States



My bad.....wrong bolts per your question
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
AE354803
post Apr 30 2013, 09:39 PM
Post #91


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 238
Joined: 13-August 12
From: Southern California
Member No.: 14,801
Region Association: Southern California



Got that spec, thanks though. I'm looking for the 4 small nuts on the back of the pump, the ones that hold it together (type 4 pump)

Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
pilothyer
post Apr 30 2013, 10:04 PM
Post #92


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 838
Joined: 21-May 08
From: N. Alabama
Member No.: 9,080
Region Association: South East States



As a builder of many type 4 engines as well as a proponent of using the type 4 pump I'm sure I use 5 ft lbs torque on these four 6 mm nuts. This along with the spring washers should be plenty. I have combed over the factory manual for the information but haven't had any luck finding it.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Java2570
post May 1 2013, 06:18 AM
Post #93


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 649
Joined: 7-May 11
From: Fishers, IN
Member No.: 13,035
Region Association: Upper MidWest



I'm pretty sure that in his video, Jake mentions there is no real torque value on those nuts but just get em good and snug. I would say 5 ft lb is about right
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
AE354803
post May 1 2013, 11:07 AM
Post #94


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 238
Joined: 13-August 12
From: Southern California
Member No.: 14,801
Region Association: Southern California



Sound good to me. Maybe I'll throw some blue loctite on there for good measure.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
AE354803
post May 5 2013, 11:43 PM
Post #95


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 238
Joined: 13-August 12
From: Southern California
Member No.: 14,801
Region Association: Southern California



Where can I remove material from the Keith Black pictures in order to static balance? There is no ridge across the center and I do not want to remove material that is not along the centerline of the piston following the pin.


Also I'm looking for the small (2mm x 8 mm) dowel pins that keep the bearings from rotating. I have 4 out of 5 of them.


AA - bearing pin

Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
AE354803
post May 8 2013, 01:08 PM
Post #96


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 238
Joined: 13-August 12
From: Southern California
Member No.: 14,801
Region Association: Southern California



I've been looking at the pistons and I think I'll remove material from the balance holes that have been drilled into the bottom of the wrist pin area. I figure that I'll just chamfer/countersink the top edge a little bit and it shouldn't affect the strength.

I'm not sure on whether to remove material uniformly from the hole of take more from the portions furthest from the wrist pin since these areas would affect strength even less.

I only need to remove a max of 1 gram of material to get them balanced.

Any thoughts?



On a side note. There was no distributor drive pinion shim (021-105-235) in the engine when I disassembled, this part is surprisingly difficult to source. None of my local shops have it.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
AE354803
post May 8 2013, 06:43 PM
Post #97


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 238
Joined: 13-August 12
From: Southern California
Member No.: 14,801
Region Association: Southern California



I'm measuring the piston-cylinder gap. Spec is 0.0021 - 0.0029 inches (wear limit of 0.007").

I have new Keith Black 96 mm and new EMW 96 mm cylinders (which from everything I read are really good)

It seems like I have a very tight tolerance on the tall portion of the piston skirt I can't even fit a gauge in (0.001 is my smallest but I don't want to force it) (perpendicular to the wrist pin) (see yellow arrow)

The clearance at the edges of the skirt are in spec (0.00225-0.00275") (see green arrow)

The clearance on the wrist pin portions are very loose (I would guess about 0.010" which is hard to measure because of the curve of the cylinder/piston) (see red arrow)

I understand the tight fit on the tall portions of the skirt since that is where most of the wear will come due to the piston rocking, however the extra slop on the sides seems excessive, any advice on this?


If I rotate the piston in the cylinder it maintains the same clearances, so it seems the pistons are purposely out of round and the cylinder is very cylindrical.

Thanks for any help...

Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Valy
post May 8 2013, 07:56 PM
Post #98


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,677
Joined: 6-April 10
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Member No.: 11,573
Region Association: Northern California



All pistons have oval skirts as you measured.
The top however must be round.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
AE354803
post May 8 2013, 09:19 PM
Post #99


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 238
Joined: 13-August 12
From: Southern California
Member No.: 14,801
Region Association: Southern California



The top had the same large gap all the way around, seems like I'm good then.

Any input on where to remove material for the static balance?

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
AE354803
post May 11 2013, 06:57 PM
Post #100


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 238
Joined: 13-August 12
From: Southern California
Member No.: 14,801
Region Association: Southern California



During platigage fit today, found out the cam thrust bearings are too tight, they jam onto the camshaft and stay on it, I had to push the camshaft a bit to get it in there.

Does this sound normal? The thrust portion of the thrust bearing seems to be too big and jams in the camshaft, has to be pried off after the camshaft is removed.

I have kolbenschmidt bearings, should I switch to something else?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

7 Pages V « < 3 4 5 6 7 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 2nd April 2026 - 09:51 AM
...