Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> SOT: Subaru engines known for being problematic?, Sure seems to go against what I thunk...
horizontally-opposed
post May 21 2007, 01:06 PM
Post #1


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,456
Joined: 12-May 04
From: San Francisco
Member No.: 2,058
Region Association: None



Can you Subie experts weigh in on this? Got a letter from someone blasting Subaru engines as "unreliable" and "problematic" and poorly designed.

He also blasts Subaru and Fuji for ignoring the problems, then tells me to Google "Subaru Problems," which leads me to:

http://subaruproblems.com/

Thoughts? Alarmist? Accurate? Possible, but not likely?

I know a few of us have spent the kind of time on the Subaru boards to know more than I do. I've always heard Subies are quite reliable and my 2003 WRX seemed to be bulletproof, but then I sold it at 30,000 miles and thus lost to the chance to prove it...

Thanks!

pete
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
TonyAKAVW
post May 21 2007, 01:11 PM
Post #2


That's my ride.
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,151
Joined: 17-January 03
From: Redondo Beach, CA
Member No.: 166
Region Association: None



I had heard that the DOHC (pre 2000 I think) were prone to head gasket leaks. Moreso than the later SOHC version (like what I have). So yes I think there is a known problem with those motors. how widespread I don't know. I bought my engine with 41,000 miles on it and have probably put another 3,000 miles on it since then with no coolant leak problems at all (knock on wood).

As far as Subaru engines in general, I have never heard that they are unreliable. Subaru engines probalby get blown in general more than other makes simply because of the type of people who buy WRXs. The same goes with crashes. There's a reason that the Mitsubishi Evo and the WRX are among the most expensive cars to insure.

-Tony
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
DBCooper
post May 21 2007, 02:19 PM
Post #3


14's in the 13's with ATTITUDE
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,079
Joined: 25-August 04
From: Dazed and Confused
Member No.: 2,618
Region Association: Northern California



Personal experience, we replaced the head gaskets in my son's 97 2.5, but only because of a broken timing gear from a collision. It's still going fine 100K miles later. My problem with Subaru engines, when I was trying to buy one for a conversion, is that the engine in every wrecked car I could find already had 160-190K miles on it. Can't see that it's THAT big a problem.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jeffs9146
post May 21 2007, 03:25 PM
Post #4


Ski Bum
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,062
Joined: 10-January 03
From: Discovery Bay, Ca
Member No.: 128



My mom had a 1999 subie wagon that blew up twice with less than 40,000 on each engine! She properly maintained everything and never missed an oil change either!

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
carreraguy
post May 21 2007, 03:31 PM
Post #5


It's not your dad's 914!
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,197
Joined: 17-October 03
From: San Jose, CA
Member No.: 1,256
Region Association: Northern California



The engine used for my swap was a 2004 2.0 WRX turbo with 30K miles on it and I've had zero issues since installation, about 3,000 miles.
Later,
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
PRS914-6
post May 21 2007, 03:51 PM
Post #6


Excellence Magazine Project 914 3.6
***

Group: Retired Members
Posts: 1,278
Joined: 20-May 06
From: Central California
Member No.: 6,031
Region Association: None



Pete, I think the problems were pretty much solved in the later engines. They did have head gasket issues in the early models and I don't feel the "conditioner" was a good fix. It just saved them warranty work.

I'm a ski bum and almost everyone I ski with owns a Subie and they get a lot of hard mountain use. None of them have a complaint. Again, they are all late model cars though.

I almost bought an STI. My check book was out but decided to build the 914 instead. The STI would have been cheaper...... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/sad.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Justinp71
post May 21 2007, 04:16 PM
Post #7


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,647
Joined: 11-October 04
From: Sacramento, CA
Member No.: 2,922
Region Association: None



QUOTE(PRS914-6 @ May 21 2007, 02:51 PM) *

Pete, I think the problems were pretty much solved in the later engines. They did have head gasket issues in the early models and I don't feel the "conditioner" was a good fix. It just saved them warranty work.

I'm a ski bum and almost everyone I ski with owns a Subie and they get a lot of hard mountain use. None of them have a complaint. Again, they are all late model cars though.

I almost bought an STI. My check book was out but decided to build the 914 instead. The STI would have been cheaper...... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/sad.gif)



But your car will be faster and cheaper on insurance (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) Plus anyone can go out and get an STI.

On the topic... A few of my family members have had subaru's... always reliable.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mueller
post May 21 2007, 05:07 PM
Post #8


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 17,155
Joined: 4-January 03
From: Antioch, CA
Member No.: 87
Region Association: None



Rich Herzog (sp??) had a head gasket issues with his Suby, more than once I think....it was an older motor which I think was mentioned earlier.....

I'm guessing the letter writer had a bad experiance and has no idea or even cares if quality has gotten better.....he'll forever say they are junk or problematic....

I'm guessing a 911 owner that got beaten by a WRX (IMG:style_emoticons/default/hide.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
VaccaRabite
post May 21 2007, 07:30 PM
Post #9


En Garde!
**********

Group: Admin
Posts: 13,845
Joined: 15-December 03
From: Dallastown, PA
Member No.: 1,435
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



I've had mine now for 75K miles. Its an 04. Nary a hiccup. The only time that I was stopped was for a dead battery.

The 04 imprezas were rated the most reliable cars for thier first model year, bumping Honda and Toyota. Pretty much, they run forever, unless you abuse them. The 02 WRX trannies got a bad name from kids doing big clutch dumps. Not a drag car.

Zach
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ws91420
post May 21 2007, 07:51 PM
Post #10


Yes I have one a Lensley 914
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,063
Joined: 10-September 03
From: Ruther Glen,VA (halfway between sticks and civilization)
Member No.: 1,137
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



I believe the problems w/ the heads and gaskets wer the 80' and into the 90's. I think now the problems are gone unless you do something stupid.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
drewvw
post May 21 2007, 09:03 PM
Post #11


new england car guy
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,632
Joined: 24-February 06
From: Boston, MA
Member No.: 5,630
Region Association: North East States




my brother and dad both have high mileage subie wagons and nary an engine problem. They do seem to eat mufflers and brakes fairly often though...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Chris Pincetich
post May 22 2007, 04:14 PM
Post #12


B-)
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,082
Joined: 3-October 05
From: Point Reyes Station, CA
Member No.: 4,907
Region Association: Northern California



Yeaaahhhh right. I would NEVER buy a Boxter because the engines are soooo unreliable, leaking all over the place. Ha ha (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)

So which pile is bigger, the letters that LIKE the 914 WRX or the letters that HATE it???

I really liked the article myself, very well approached and written. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/beerchug.gif)

My 1999 Legacy Outback has needed nothin but fresh oil and a little coolant from 125K-150K and counting. The auto trans on mine seems to be the weakest link.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
RoninEclipse2G
post May 22 2007, 05:26 PM
Post #13


Suby Geek
**

Group: Members
Posts: 232
Joined: 28-April 07
From: Parker, Colorado
Member No.: 7,701
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



04 wrx wagon, 110k miles (yes I know that's a lot) nothing but regular maintenance, runs like new.
87 xt, 300k+ miles, finally ate the headgasket and valve stem seals.

Every manufacturer is bound to have a few hiccup cars now and then (usually friday afternoon cars (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) ) unfortunately for them it's the people with the ones that slip through the cracks that tend to open their mouths the widest.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
fiid
post May 22 2007, 07:50 PM
Post #14


Turbo Megasquirted Subaru Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,828
Joined: 7-April 03
From: San Francisco, CA
Member No.: 530
Region Association: Northern California



My stepfather in the UK has had Subaru's for years (he's the reason I started buying them).... He usually gets told by the MOT (annual inspection) inspector that the body is too rotted to hold the engine/suspension in place and the car is structurally unsafe. This usually happens because the car is uh like 10 years old, and worth about $50 - i.e. he's run it into the ground.

My stepfather, btw uses his 1.8 subaru for things like towing 3 ton loads up 3 mile dirt tracks, and similarly stupid stunts. THey get a lot of offroad time, as well as a lot of driving in icy or snowy conditions on salted roads and the like, and the rest of the time - it's raining (he lives in the UK)...

I don't consider them to be unreliable at all - quite the opposite.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Dave_Darling
post May 22 2007, 08:37 PM
Post #15


914 Idiot
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 15,335
Joined: 9-January 03
From: Silicon Valley / Kailua-Kona
Member No.: 121
Region Association: Northern California



So far, everyone I (personally) know who owns a 90s-vintage 2.5L four-banger Scooby has had the head gasket go. Granted, that's only three cars--but that's all of the 2.5L Scooby owners I know!

No problems reported with the other Scooby engines, and that's a much larger number of people. (Hmmm, about 10?)

--DD
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
project-914
post May 23 2007, 11:39 AM
Post #16


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 181
Joined: 2-August 06
From: Oklahoma
Member No.: 6,571



I have had no problems whatsoever with my 2002 2.0l turbo engine in my wrx...I'm not sure about older models though

but, all I've ever heard in the suby community is they run forever
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
aircooledboy
post May 23 2007, 03:40 PM
Post #17


Sweet Pea's 1st ride in daddy's "vroom -vroom"
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,672
Joined: 4-February 04
From: Rockford, IL
Member No.: 1,629
Region Association: Upper MidWest



Lets see, we've had an '83 wagon, and 88 wagon, a 91 Legacy and a 98 Impreza. Put over 150,000 on each (220k on the Legacy),except the Impreza, which I sold to my brother w/ 60K on it, and he has put another trouble-free 60k on it since. Other than maintenance, the most expensive repair I ever made on any of them was rebuilding the carb on the 83 2x in 6 months.

Yep, freaking hunks of crap. Not sure why I kept buyin' the damn things. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif)



I take your post to mean some self-important douche bag took the time to write you a letter busting your balls not only because you did the conversion article, but because he couldn't enjoy his glass of merlot or brie after he was unable to shield his eyes from the sight of the impure and notoriously unreliable Subaru engine.
Good lord the world is full of ass hats.
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/wacko.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/huh.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
RoninEclipse2G
post May 23 2007, 03:47 PM
Post #18


Suby Geek
**

Group: Members
Posts: 232
Joined: 28-April 07
From: Parker, Colorado
Member No.: 7,701
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



the coolant leaks that person is talking about at the web page is a defective seal on the radiator endtank, nothing to do with the actual engine itself, and applied to the 02 WRX only IIRC. When I worked for Checker auto parts we sold a couple radiators for this problem. not a mechanical issue. don't listen to this crackpot that sent you the letter.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
sww914
post May 23 2007, 06:11 PM
Post #19


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,439
Joined: 4-June 06
Member No.: 6,146
Region Association: None



02 WRX, 85,000 miles.
I put rear brake pads and a wheel bearing on it last week.
I change the oil. I don't drive it nice, I wring it's neck.
End of story.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
RoninEclipse2G
post May 23 2007, 06:13 PM
Post #20


Suby Geek
**

Group: Members
Posts: 232
Joined: 28-April 07
From: Parker, Colorado
Member No.: 7,701
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



QUOTE(sww914 @ May 23 2007, 06:11 PM) *

02 WRX, 85,000 miles.
I put rear brake pads and a wheel bearing on it last week.
I change the oil. I don't drive it nice, I wring it's neck.
End of story.


precisely! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/boldblue.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 2nd April 2026 - 07:49 AM
...