Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Minor motor issues, Cylinder Head temp sensor?
JRust
post Oct 15 2009, 02:09 AM
Post #1


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 6,305
Joined: 10-January 03
From: Corvallis Oregon
Member No.: 129
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



My engine is basically done. Only down side is the Cylinder head temp sensor is on the wrong side. With it being nice & sealed up I hate to pull it apart again. Is there any reason I can't just put a hole on the drives side tin for it? Cover the other hole?

Well???
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
type47
post Oct 15 2009, 06:09 AM
Post #2


Viermeister
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,254
Joined: 7-August 03
From: Vienna, VA
Member No.: 994
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



Why not? At this point, seems to me to be the only option. Only problem is, isn't the CHT on cylinder #3, the one that gets the hottest? (fuzzy early morning pre-caffinated memory)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
DNHunt
post Oct 15 2009, 07:04 AM
Post #3


914 Wizard? No way. I got too much to learn.
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,099
Joined: 21-April 03
From: Gig Harbor, WA
Member No.: 598



I can't see why it would make a difference in the way the car runs since it only affects warm up. Maybe the mixture will stay a tad rich a few seconds longer.

However you will have to jumper a wire to the harness since the spade connector will be on the wrong side. If the car is to enjoy I wouldn't worry about it. If it will be a garage queen CW then you better change it.

Dave
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
gary gartner
post Oct 15 2009, 09:44 AM
Post #4


i know more than a newbie---way less than a guru
**

Group: Members
Posts: 239
Joined: 16-December 04
From: Valencia, Ca
Member No.: 3,294
Region Association: Southern California





Excuse me, but how does the CHTS get on thw WRONG side.


"I installed the motor backwards just for fun"??????????? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smoke.gif)

Gary
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
dr914@autoatlanta.com
post Oct 15 2009, 09:46 AM
Post #5


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,842
Joined: 3-January 07
From: atlanta georgia
Member No.: 7,418
Region Association: None



QUOTE(JRust @ Oct 15 2009, 01:09 AM) *

My engine is basically done. Only down side is the Cylinder head temp sensor is on the wrong side. With it being nice & sealed up I hate to pull it apart again. Is there any reason I can't just put a hole on the drives side tin for it? Cover the other hole?

Well???


I would tap the right pass head and install it in the correct position. All you would have to do is remove the right cylinder cover. Not a big deal
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
aircooledtechguy
post Oct 15 2009, 10:24 AM
Post #6


The Aircooledtech Guy
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,966
Joined: 8-November 08
From: Anacortes, WA
Member No.: 9,730
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



I wouldn't bother until the motor has to come out or the covers come off for a real reason. The CHT sensor for the EFI does not have to be on #3 to do it's job for the EFI. Cyl. #2 will work just fine and the EFI won't notice the difference. No need to make things harder. . .
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
agentblr
post Oct 15 2009, 10:32 AM
Post #7


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 303
Joined: 23-January 04
From: Lee's Summit MO
Member No.: 1,595



QUOTE(gary gartner @ Oct 15 2009, 07:44 AM) *

Excuse me, but how does the CHTS get on thw WRONG side.


"I installed the motor backwards just for fun"??????????? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smoke.gif)

Gary



The cylinder heads are identical and were switched during a rebuild....I've seen it few times !
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
gary gartner
post Oct 15 2009, 11:28 AM
Post #8


i know more than a newbie---way less than a guru
**

Group: Members
Posts: 239
Joined: 16-December 04
From: Valencia, Ca
Member No.: 3,294
Region Association: Southern California







"The cylinder heads are identical and were switched during a rebuild....I've seen it few times !"
'


thanks, I've never rebuillt a T4, or any other motor, for that mattter.
appreciate the info

Gary
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ConeDodger
post Oct 15 2009, 11:40 AM
Post #9


Apex killer!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 23,580
Joined: 31-December 04
From: Tahoe Area
Member No.: 3,380
Region Association: Northern California



The biggest reason to do this right has been alluded to by others. The #3 cylinder gets the hottest with the stock tin configuration (other cooling systems exist and are reportedly more efficient). If you put the CHT on the #1 #2 side you risk running leaner. Leaner is hotter, and the spiral continues into oblivion. Oblivion by the way makes a loud expensive noise.

The EFI uses that CHT data to decide on injector pulse time. Don't tell your ECU lies.

Now is a good time to do it right. (this should be all of our mantras)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
JRust
post Oct 15 2009, 12:38 PM
Post #10


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 6,305
Joined: 10-January 03
From: Corvallis Oregon
Member No.: 129
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



I do plan to put the FI on eventually. I am starting with carbs anyway so it is not getting changed now. I do not want to have him pull the heads again & switch them. I see what you are saying with it affecting the FI & how it runs. It will have a nice set of Dual 40 Webers on it. Maybe at some point it will get FI put back on it. By the time I get to that it will probably have an oil leak of somekind I need to fix anyway (IMG:style_emoticons/default/dry.gif) . Thanks for all the solid advice guys (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
aircooledtechguy
post Oct 15 2009, 06:17 PM
Post #11


The Aircooledtech Guy
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,966
Joined: 8-November 08
From: Anacortes, WA
Member No.: 9,730
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



QUOTE(ConeDodger @ Oct 15 2009, 10:40 AM) *

The biggest reason to do this right has been alluded to by others. The #3 cylinder gets the hottest with the stock tin configuration (other cooling systems exist and are reportedly more efficient). If you put the CHT on the #1 #2 side you risk running leaner. Leaner is hotter, and the spiral continues into oblivion. Oblivion by the way makes a loud expensive noise.

The EFI uses that CHT data to decide on injector pulse time. Don't tell your ECU lies.

Now is a good time to do it right. (this should be all of our mantras)


I understand the point you are trying to make, however I could not disagree more.

A cooler temp sensor will cause the EFI to run RICHER not leaner because the oHms will be ever so slightly higher on a slightly cooler head. However the engine doesn't even get up to full operating temp before these sensors read near zero resistance and the ECU goes to it's leanest settings.

These are not accurate temp sensing devices such as a gauge sender like a Westach or even VDO. They crudely sense heat and lower the oHms of resistance and the ECU leans out as they warm. Even a dead cylinder will create enough heat through friction to begin to lean out the ECU. . .

As I've said, the ECU will never know the difference. These old ECUs are not that smart (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
computers4kids
post Oct 15 2009, 07:05 PM
Post #12


Love these little cars!
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,443
Joined: 11-June 05
From: Port Townsend, WA
Member No.: 4,253
Region Association: None



Jamie,
EFI will run richer on warm-up with the sensor on the wrong cylinder. The PO of my 2.0 74 with EFI mixed up the heads when the motor was rebuilt.

My solution, was to install a potentiometer in line with the lead that went to the sensor. I adjusted the pot until I was very happy with the way it ran both in the warm-up stage and hot running. Once the sweet spot was found, just remove the pot and measure the resistance. Go to Radio Shack and for a few dollars buy the correct resistor(s). I then inserted the resistor in line to the TS2 and never looked back. If you decide to go with EFI, let me know and I'll mail the POT to you.

Now for those of you who will read my comment and start frothing and can't wait to hit the reply button, I know changing the hot running resistance of a TS2 line is like using bailing wire, but it can produce great results.

If the motor isn't in the car already, swap the heads...remember, this is a LE. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
JRust
post Oct 15 2009, 11:02 PM
Post #13


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 6,305
Joined: 10-January 03
From: Corvallis Oregon
Member No.: 129
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



After thinking on it more today. We are going to pull the heads & switch them. Not that big a deal really. Nothing like doing a job a couple times to learn your lesson. I'll be heading up tommorow night to help with it. I'll be taking all my tin up. Along with my nice Allen head screws I got from Mikey914 (Vendor here making all those awesome aftermarket seals & bumper tops (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) ). I'll post some pics of my motor with it's tin in place tommorow night hopefully. Nothing seems to go that smoothly even though it is getting done.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 10th May 2024 - 01:41 AM