Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> 914 WRX needs Turbo exhaust Engine builder Experts Advice needed, more backpressure/heat in exhaust...what needs to be adjusted?
budman5201
post Dec 1 2009, 06:41 PM
Post #1


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 595
Joined: 1-April 07
From: tempe, az
Member No.: 7,635



Okay i have a question out there for the Engine builder or exhaust experts.....

I have a 914 with a WRX 2.0 turbo in it, it flys! I am basically making it into a very streetable quiet car. One of the first things i did during my build is put this aftermarket very shiny equal length chrome header on it and took off the stock heavy cast manifold for more power(never tuned or ran with stock).

I had the engine tuned with this header on it, so its perfectly tuned with it. Now.....I have the stock heavy manifold back on with all the heat reflectors,etc to keep the heat in the manfolds......its is Noticeably quieter than with the equal length, lower to the ground, crappy shiny header and... power seems almost just as great.

So....
New heaver manifold before turbo, smaller diameter exit than aftermarket so more backpressure.....do i need any changes on my fuel map? (i have programmable Link storm ecu.)

(I did get one backfire through exhaust....thats really why i am asking)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
bfrymire
post Dec 1 2009, 09:00 PM
Post #2


Salsaholic
***

Group: Members
Posts: 590
Joined: 1-August 04
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Member No.: 2,431
Region Association: Northern California




(IMG:style_emoticons/default/popcorn[1].gif)

(I want to know also....)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Numbchux
post Dec 1 2009, 09:04 PM
Post #3


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 33
Joined: 3-September 09
From: Duluth, MN
Member No.: 10,758
Region Association: Upper MidWest



going back to stock exhaust, your turbo will spool slower. so you'll actually have a bit less air than your fuel trims are set for. So you'll run a bit rich. Not an issue for reliability, not at all. But, you're probably not getting as much power or mileage as it's capable. The biggest change is that if you're running the stock up-pipe (USDM, anyway), there's a cat between the engine and turbo, that really slows down the spool!

The issue is going the other way, if your turbo is spooling quicker, you're going to run lean. and that's when you risk detonation.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
budman5201
post Dec 1 2009, 10:14 PM
Post #4


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 595
Joined: 1-April 07
From: tempe, az
Member No.: 7,635



QUOTE(Numbchux @ Dec 1 2009, 08:04 PM) *

going back to stock exhaust, your turbo will spool slower. so you'll actually have a bit less air than your fuel trims are set for. So you'll run a bit rich. Not an issue for reliability, not at all. But, you're probably not getting as much power or mileage as it's capable. The biggest change is that if you're running the stock up-pipe (USDM, anyway), there's a cat between the engine and turbo, that really slows down the spool!

The issue is going the other way, if your turbo is spooling quicker, you're going to run lean. and that's when you risk detonation.

thats exactly what i thought. thankyou. I have the JDM version so no cat, and my up pipe is custom made by me, so its huge compared to the exit of the stock manifold.

So it sounds like, actually, since i am running a little rich now, i should pick up a little more mileage too if at tuning day i reduce the fuel trim to match my perfect AFR.

Dyno day here i come, this time its a little easier and cheaper since all the bugs are worked out.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
GS Guy
post Dec 2 2009, 11:32 AM
Post #5


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 243
Joined: 8-July 04
From: Columbia, MD
Member No.: 2,325
Region Association: North East States



Hey Budman,

What kind'a muffler are you running? Have any sound clips?

I too want to run a live-ably semi-quite system, so I fitted the biggest muffler that would fit my situation - though it's a Magnaflow, so not quite sure how it's going to sound.
My header is sort of a copy of the factory exhaust layout - short headpipes joining together right out of the head, and both sides connected with a Y section, feeding the turbo after that.
I suspect it will sound a lot like your typical WRX with an aftermarket exhaust/muffler.

Jeff
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
budman5201
post Dec 2 2009, 07:17 PM
Post #6


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 595
Joined: 1-April 07
From: tempe, az
Member No.: 7,635



QUOTE(GS Guy @ Dec 2 2009, 10:32 AM) *

Hey Budman,

What kind'a muffler are you running? Have any sound clips?

I too want to run a live-ably semi-quite system, so I fitted the biggest muffler that would fit my situation - though it's a Magnaflow, so not quite sure how it's going to sound.
My header is sort of a copy of the factory exhaust layout - short headpipes joining together right out of the head, and both sides connected with a Y section, feeding the turbo after that.
I suspect it will sound a lot like your typical WRX with an aftermarket exhaust/muffler.

Jeff


so far just an el cheapo Autozone Factory looking muffler. Not even a turbo muffler. Not sure of the brand really. I bet the magnaflow will sound good. I heard those are good at idle and just off idle, and they are LOUD when you lay it down! which might be perfect!

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Numbchux
post Dec 3 2009, 03:40 AM
Post #7


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 33
Joined: 3-September 09
From: Duluth, MN
Member No.: 10,758
Region Association: Upper MidWest



QUOTE(budman5201 @ Dec 1 2009, 10:14 PM) *

QUOTE(Numbchux @ Dec 1 2009, 08:04 PM) *

going back to stock exhaust, your turbo will spool slower. so you'll actually have a bit less air than your fuel trims are set for. So you'll run a bit rich. Not an issue for reliability, not at all. But, you're probably not getting as much power or mileage as it's capable. The biggest change is that if you're running the stock up-pipe (USDM, anyway), there's a cat between the engine and turbo, that really slows down the spool!

The issue is going the other way, if your turbo is spooling quicker, you're going to run lean. and that's when you risk detonation.

thats exactly what i thought. thankyou. I have the JDM version so no cat, and my up pipe is custom made by me, so its huge compared to the exit of the stock manifold.

So it sounds like, actually, since i am running a little rich now, i should pick up a little more mileage too if at tuning day i reduce the fuel trim to match my perfect AFR.

Dyno day here i come, this time its a little easier and cheaper since all the bugs are worked out.


Ok, so it's not quite as extreme a change compared to a USDM stock exhaust.

But yep, you're on the right track. safe to drive, but some power and mileage to be had by leaning it out a bit.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th May 2024 - 08:20 PM