Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Identifying new vs. old ball joints
RiqueMar
post Feb 4 2010, 10:36 AM
Post #1


Enrique Allen Mar
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,169
Joined: 28-August 08
From: San Diego, CA
Member No.: 9,478
Region Association: Southern California



I've been told that there is an 'early' and 'late' style design for ball joints, but how can you tell?

I have these pictured below, so they are early because of the half circled notch, correct?

Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
dr914@autoatlanta.com
post Feb 4 2010, 11:45 AM
Post #2


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,864
Joined: 3-January 07
From: atlanta georgia
Member No.: 7,418
Region Association: None



QUOTE(RiqueMar @ Feb 4 2010, 09:36 AM) *

I've been told that there is an 'early' and 'late' style design for ball joints, but how can you tell?

I have these pictured below, so they are early because of the half circled notch, correct?

Attached Image


THAT IS EARLY one 70-the late 72 model year. The late ones have a V notch (rather than the rounded one as pictured) for the tapered roll pin
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jaxdream
post Feb 4 2010, 11:56 AM
Post #3


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 974
Joined: 8-July 08
From: North Central Tennessee
Member No.: 9,270
Region Association: South East States



Doc , rephrase your description of the pin , may confuse with what some call a spring pin . It's a wedge pin with a threaded section for securing tthe balljoint stud to the strut housing.
I replaced the aarms on a 94 Ford Probe , they used the bolt / clamp style on the strut bottoms , such as the 72 and earlier 914 , which seems to be what is pictured here. Half moon cut on stud =72 and eariler , V notch on stud = 73 and later .This setup is also used on 911's , providing the use of 911 struts on 914 a arms , just got to match up balljoint studs with the correct strut.

Jack / Jaxdream
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Cap'n Krusty
post Feb 4 2010, 01:21 PM
Post #4


Cap'n Krusty
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,794
Joined: 24-June 04
From: Santa Maria, CA
Member No.: 2,246
Region Association: Central California



The switch from the "pinch bolt" design to the "wedge pin" design occurred with the '73
after VIN 919032. There were wear issues, even as early as 3 years old, with strut wear due to the slot in the strut which allowed the pinch bolt to function. The wedge pin struts don't have the slot, and are much stronger. It's difficult to find an early strut that isn't junk.

The Cap'n
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Gint
post Feb 4 2010, 06:05 PM
Post #5


Mike Ginter
***************

Group: Admin
Posts: 16,071
Joined: 26-December 02
From: Denver CO.
Member No.: 20
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



Check this thread. Post #11 has a diagram with a picture of the late wedge bolt.

http://www.914world.com/bbs2/index.php?showtopic=94096&

(IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/uploads/post-9003-1238637134.jpg)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
balljoint
post Feb 4 2010, 06:08 PM
Post #6


914 Wizard
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,000
Joined: 6-April 04
Member No.: 1,897
Region Association: None



Here are some detailed pics....(IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
























- Admin Edit

Seriously Dave, that was disgusting, go back to the sandbox you're not helping.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
r_towle
post Feb 4 2010, 07:59 PM
Post #7


Custom Member
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 24,574
Joined: 9-January 03
From: Taxachusetts
Member No.: 124
Region Association: North East States



simple...early ball joints SUCK
later ones actually work.

Swapped mine out....struts, calipers, rotors etc...all of it.

Rich
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
RiqueMar
post Feb 5 2010, 11:34 AM
Post #8


Enrique Allen Mar
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,169
Joined: 28-August 08
From: San Diego, CA
Member No.: 9,478
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE(r_towle @ Feb 4 2010, 05:59 PM) *

simple...early ball joints SUCK
later ones actually work.

Swapped mine out....struts, calipers, rotors etc...all of it.

Rich



Besides the ware factor, is there any other reason that the later joints are better? Like performance wise?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th May 2024 - 06:33 PM