Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V < 1 2 3  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Traditional Limited Slip vs. Torque Bias, Please eduficate me!
Matt Monson
post May 4 2010, 01:53 PM
Post #41


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 156
Joined: 9-August 05
From: Boulder, CO
Member No.: 4,562
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



Hello Guys,

It's been a while since I logged in. I just happened to be looking for some information today and came across this fine thread on my other search.

Andy,

I am going to side with the guys who are telling you to go with a torque biasing differential. For all but a dedicated track car I really feel that it's the best option for a 914. It's what I personally run in my own 914. I think it's the way to go for the vast majority of us 914 owners, whether it's got a bone stock 1.7 Type IV or a monster 3.6 swap. It's just very well suited to the chassis dynamics of the car.

Part of why so many 911 owners swear by a true LSD is because of the rear engine design. With all that weight out on the rear end, there's that infamous 911 tailwag under hard braking. Because an LSD locks under braking it helps to make the car much more stable as you bring it down from speed. The midengine design of the 914 makes it inherently more stable under those same conditions. That stability isn't needed in the same way with the 914.

Aside from adding those comments, I don't really see much of anything that I will disagree with in the conversation going on here. Though there is one thing that I do want to mention, and that's regarding the service life of our LSDs. Every time this topic comes up there's a lot of discussion about the cost of rebuilding the LSD and the fact that it does need service over time. This is a practical reality of LSD ownership but it's not something that is a deal breaker for most people. The service life of the internals for our LSDs are about the same as the service life of the clutch or synchros. This isn't something that you're going to be ripping out every year or two and rebuilding, even if the car is a dedicated track car. People get years and years of use out of these things between rebuilds.

Just a couple of examples from recent experience. Last month I rebuilt an early GT LSD. This LSD was so old it still had a welded cap and wasn't CNC billet. The owner had purchased it new from Paul and it was well over a decade old. It was from a 911sc running a hot rod 3.2 engine on carbs that was mostly street driven with a couple of DE/track days a year. The owner said he drives about 5000 miles a year. This was the first rebuild on it. Or, there's Pat Williams' personal 400whp 930. He's been running the GT LSD for 4 seasons of dedicated PCA club racing now. He checked his before he put the car on the track this year and said that he wasn't even close to needing it rebuilt. So, there's a couple real world examples from different applications and levels of abuse. The short version is they hold up and stay together a good long time between services.

I'll try to come aroud more. This used to be one of my favorite P-car boards and work just kind of drew me away. Maybe we should even look at becoming a site sponsor. We've got some new products coming out that are appropriate for the 914 and you would be a good group of people to offer them to.

Regards,

Matt Monson
Guard Transmission LLC
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
PRS914-6
post May 4 2010, 02:08 PM
Post #42


Excellence Magazine Project 914 3.6
***

Group: Retired Members
Posts: 1,278
Joined: 20-May 06
From: Central California
Member No.: 6,031
Region Association: None



QUOTE
Regards,

Matt Monson
Guard Transmission LLC


Would you be the Matt from Carquip? If yes, glad you are here! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SirAndy
post May 4 2010, 02:31 PM
Post #43


Resident German
*************************

Group: Admin
Posts: 41,658
Joined: 21-January 03
From: Oakland, Kalifornia
Member No.: 179
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(Matt Monson @ May 4 2010, 12:53 PM) *

...

I'll try to come aroud more. This used to be one of my favorite P-car boards and work just kind of drew me away. Maybe we should even look at becoming a site sponsor. We've got some new products coming out that are appropriate for the 914 and you would be a good group of people to offer them to.

Thank you Sir!


And welcome back ...
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/bye1.gif) Andy

PS: Now all i need is the side-shifter conversion for my 915 ...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
EdwardBlume
post May 4 2010, 03:13 PM
Post #44


914 Wizard
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 12,338
Joined: 2-January 03
From: SLO
Member No.: 81
Region Association: Central California



I think the LSD is still overkill for a purely street 914... I'll be running the Orange Smasher 901 in Dad's car to make sure it works, and then deal it...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
PeeGreen 914
post May 4 2010, 04:36 PM
Post #45


Just when you think you're done...wait, there is more..lol
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,219
Joined: 21-September 06
From: Seattle, WA... actually Everett
Member No.: 6,884
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



QUOTE(Matt Monson @ May 4 2010, 12:53 PM) *

Hello Guys,

It's been a while since I logged in. I just happened to be looking for some information today and came across this fine thread on my other search.

Andy,

I am going to side with the guys who are telling you to go with a torque biasing differential. For all but a dedicated track car I really feel that it's the best option for a 914. It's what I personally run in my own 914. I think it's the way to go for the vast majority of us 914 owners, whether it's got a bone stock 1.7 Type IV or a monster 3.6 swap. It's just very well suited to the chassis dynamics of the car.

Part of why so many 911 owners swear by a true LSD is because of the rear engine design. With all that weight out on the rear end, there's that infamous 911 tailwag under hard braking. Because an LSD locks under braking it helps to make the car much more stable as you bring it down from speed. The midengine design of the 914 makes it inherently more stable under those same conditions. That stability isn't needed in the same way with the 914.

Aside from adding those comments, I don't really see much of anything that I will disagree with in the conversation going on here. Though there is one thing that I do want to mention, and that's regarding the service life of our LSDs. Every time this topic comes up there's a lot of discussion about the cost of rebuilding the LSD and the fact that it does need service over time. This is a practical reality of LSD ownership but it's not something that is a deal breaker for most people. The service life of the internals for our LSDs are about the same as the service life of the clutch or synchros. This isn't something that you're going to be ripping out every year or two and rebuilding, even if the car is a dedicated track car. People get years and years of use out of these things between rebuilds.

Just a couple of examples from recent experience. Last month I rebuilt an early GT LSD. This LSD was so old it still had a welded cap and wasn't CNC billet. The owner had purchased it new from Paul and it was well over a decade old. It was from a 911sc running a hot rod 3.2 engine on carbs that was mostly street driven with a couple of DE/track days a year. The owner said he drives about 5000 miles a year. This was the first rebuild on it. Or, there's Pat Williams' personal 400whp 930. He's been running the GT LSD for 4 seasons of dedicated PCA club racing now. He checked his before he put the car on the track this year and said that he wasn't even close to needing it rebuilt. So, there's a couple real world examples from different applications and levels of abuse. The short version is they hold up and stay together a good long time between services.

I'll try to come aroud more. This used to be one of my favorite P-car boards and work just kind of drew me away. Maybe we should even look at becoming a site sponsor. We've got some new products coming out that are appropriate for the 914 and you would be a good group of people to offer them to.

Regards,

Matt Monson
Guard Transmission LLC


New stuff (IMG:style_emoticons/default/aktion035.gif) do tell more (IMG:style_emoticons/default/beerchug.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Matt Monson
post May 4 2010, 04:40 PM
Post #46


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 156
Joined: 9-August 05
From: Boulder, CO
Member No.: 4,562
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



QUOTE(PRS914-6 @ May 4 2010, 12:08 PM) *

QUOTE
Regards,

Matt Monson
Guard Transmission LLC


Would you be the Matt from Carquip? If yes, glad you are here! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)


Hello Paul,
That's me. You might recall that we spoke last summer shortly after I bought Guard.

Regards,

Matt
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Matt Monson
post May 4 2010, 04:46 PM
Post #47


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 156
Joined: 9-August 05
From: Boulder, CO
Member No.: 4,562
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



QUOTE(Phoenix 914-6GT @ May 4 2010, 02:36 PM) *


Let me talk to management around here before I go too deep down that path. I don't know how you guys are around here with the vending thing, but I don't want to step on any toes. Regardless, I personally am not fond of the very commercial approach a lot of guys take and prefer to participate on a more informational level.

But I'll give you a hint. It starts with 901 and ends with ears... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
PeeGreen 914
post May 4 2010, 04:57 PM
Post #48


Just when you think you're done...wait, there is more..lol
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,219
Joined: 21-September 06
From: Seattle, WA... actually Everett
Member No.: 6,884
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



(IMG:style_emoticons/default/drooley.gif) I'm listening. I had a Guard TB in the car I just sold and the difference was big. I know the next car I build will have one in it. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/aktion035.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
brant
post May 5 2010, 06:27 PM
Post #49


914 Wizard
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,628
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Colorado
Member No.: 47
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



QUOTE(Matt Monson @ May 4 2010, 01:53 PM) *

Part of why so many 911 owners swear by a true LSD is because of the rear engine design. With all that weight out on the rear end, there's that infamous 911 tailwag under hard braking. Because an LSD locks under braking it helps to make the car much more stable as you bring it down from speed. The midengine design of the 914 makes it inherently more stable under those same conditions. That stability isn't needed in the same way with the 914.

Regards,
Matt Monson
Guard Transmission LLC


hmmm...
actual testing of 914's verify this...
hmmm...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

3 Pages V < 1 2 3
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 27th May 2024 - 11:27 AM