Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V < 1 2 3 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Cooling system flaps, how are they supposed to be oriented?
ChrisFoley
post Jun 17 2010, 11:06 AM
Post #21


I am Tangerine Racing
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,926
Joined: 29-January 03
From: Bolton, CT
Member No.: 209
Region Association: None



QUOTE(Vacca Rabite @ Jun 17 2010, 12:53 PM) *

If you take out the flaps, you are not forcing the air to go through the oil cooler, which will result in higher oil temps.

Do you have test results?
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SirAndy
post Jun 17 2010, 11:11 AM
Post #22


Resident German
*************************

Group: Admin
Posts: 41,648
Joined: 21-January 03
From: Oakland, Kalifornia
Member No.: 179
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(Racer Chris @ Jun 17 2010, 10:05 AM) *

QUOTE(SirAndy @ Jun 17 2010, 01:01 PM) *

Without the flaps there will be no air flow to the oil-cooler.

I don't believe that for a second. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/cool_shades.gif)

Well, there will be some, but it is severely limited ... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/cool_shades.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Root_Werks
post Jun 17 2010, 11:24 AM
Post #23


Village Idiot
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,321
Joined: 25-May 04
From: About 5NM from Canada
Member No.: 2,105
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



(IMG:style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif) (insert big sigh here)

There is probably a reason VW spent money developing the flappers to function like they do. At worst, I'd leave them in the failed open position always working to get the thermostat fixed, hooked up or whatever.

Threads like this kinda scare me. People wanting to run their "Street" cars as cool as possible.

Cool, go for it and have fun trying to burn all that condensate out of the crankcase and oil.

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/aktion035.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
McMark
post Jun 17 2010, 11:33 AM
Post #24


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 20,179
Joined: 13-March 03
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Member No.: 419
Region Association: None



Everyone knows auto manufacturers like to spend time and money developing parts that are completely unnecessary. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
VaccaRabite
post Jun 17 2010, 12:18 PM
Post #25


En Garde!
**********

Group: Admin
Posts: 13,444
Joined: 15-December 03
From: Dallastown, PA
Member No.: 1,435
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



QUOTE(Racer Chris @ Jun 17 2010, 12:06 PM) *

QUOTE(Vacca Rabite @ Jun 17 2010, 12:53 PM) *

If you take out the flaps, you are not forcing the air to go through the oil cooler, which will result in higher oil temps.

Do you have test results?


Nope. And I am not willing to chance it with my engine, either.

I can say, though, that air will follow the path of least resistance. The flap over the oil cooler forces a percentage of the air going through the tins to be diverted to the oil cooler. There is no where else for it to go. Without the flap, the oil cooler would be a natural low pressure area, and would suck up a little warm air from under the tins into the cool air above the tins. It would not provide much, if any, cooling to the oil, aside from being a heat sink.

So, no. I don't have tests to prove it. But I am willing to believe in the theory until proven otherwise. I am always willing to be proven otherwise if someone is willing to run the tests in a relatively scientific manner.

Zach
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
JeffBowlsby
post Jun 17 2010, 01:31 PM
Post #26


914 Wiring Harnesses
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,510
Joined: 7-January 03
From: San Ramon CA
Member No.: 104
Region Association: None



Fixed my photos descriptions above. These OK now? I got these photos somewhere, apparently the descriptions were wrong there too.
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Root_Werks
post Jun 17 2010, 01:49 PM
Post #27


Village Idiot
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,321
Joined: 25-May 04
From: About 5NM from Canada
Member No.: 2,105
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



I noticed this morning the engine was running "cool" on the temp gauge. Popped the lid when I got to work, yup the little cable worked loose. Gotta fix it.

Had that not happened to me this morning, I'm pretty sure I wouldn't have bothered posting to this thread. This has been hashed out so many times I've tossed my arms up in the air to it. People will do what they want anyway.

BTW - with my 914 running cooler and having carbs, it pretty much ran like poo the whole way to work. Never really warmed up to what I have things tuned to. FI will most likely compensate for the cooler running, but carbs generally don't.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Cevan
post Jun 17 2010, 02:19 PM
Post #28


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,079
Joined: 11-December 06
From: Western Massachusetts
Member No.: 7,351



QUOTE(Root_Werks @ Jun 17 2010, 03:49 PM) *

I noticed this morning the engine was running "cool" on the temp gauge. Popped the lid when I got to work, yup the little cable worked loose. Gotta fix it.

Had that not happened to me this morning, I'm pretty sure I wouldn't have bothered posting to this thread. This has been hashed out so many times I've tossed my arms up in the air to it. People will do what they want anyway.

BTW - with my 914 running cooler and having carbs, it pretty much ran like poo the whole way to work. Never really warmed up to what I have things tuned to. FI will most likely compensate for the cooler running, but carbs generally don't.


Assuming your cooling flaps are installed correctly with the springs in place, if the cable came loose from the pinch bolt (or if the cable broke), the flaps would spring open to the "warmed up" position. Assuming your drive to work was at least 15 minutes, the engine oil should have come up to operating tempurature by then.

I think you may have a different problem, maybe with your carbs. I have my cooling flaps installed and connected to the thermostat. My engine running dual carbs runs fine right out of the gate and continues to run great after the oil is fully warmed up.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but the heads and the combustion chamber come up to temps pretty damn quick, like in a manner of minutes. Not sure how oil temps make the engine run like poo.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
stateofidleness
post Jun 20 2010, 10:56 PM
Post #29


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 810
Joined: 1-September 07
From: Canyon Lake, Texas!
Member No.: 8,065
Region Association: None



so you guys "scrapping" your cooling fins, care to donate them? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
VaccaRabite
post Jun 21 2010, 06:07 AM
Post #30


En Garde!
**********

Group: Admin
Posts: 13,444
Joined: 15-December 03
From: Dallastown, PA
Member No.: 1,435
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



QUOTE(Cevan @ Jun 17 2010, 03:19 PM) *

Correct me if I'm wrong, but the heads and the combustion chamber come up to temps pretty damn quick, like in a manner of minutes. Not sure how oil temps make the engine run like poo.



Yes and no. The heads come up to temp fast, but can also lose it fast, particularly on down hill runs, off throttle. I will regularly see my head temps drop into the 220 - 250 range, especially on my drive to work on a cooler morning. Its all fast, long downhills. Optimal temps are ~270-370.

Zach
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ME733
post Jun 21 2010, 07:07 AM
Post #31


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 842
Joined: 25-June 08
From: Atlanta Ga.
Member No.: 9,209
Region Association: South East States



QUOTE(ME733 @ Jun 16 2010, 04:49 PM) *

QUOTE(brandomc @ Jun 16 2010, 04:31 PM) *

QUOTE(ME733 @ Jun 16 2010, 01:22 PM) *

...........My preferred orentation for the heater flaps is.....folded over and driven into the ground., this saves a lot of concern over whether they are orented properly, the intermediate connection is stable, the bellows is working,the wire is still attached, or the roller is broken....and it saves the weight of that worthless crap from being hauled around....The , not insiginificant , side benefit of knowing your engine will not overheat from any failures of all that junk will give you a significant level of piece of mind. You will just have to allow a few minutes to warm up the engine before driving.(recommended for any air cooled engine-including your lawn mower, or private airplane.).


Cool, so your telling me i can take the whole flap system out and call it good? Is there anything else that i will need to pay attention to, or set up different without these flaps in? It did seem like i could just leave them out, but i wasnt quite sure how the air flows through everything.

.........Detox...may have a resonable suggeston., however I toss EVERYTHING..I have found that the oil cooler cools just fine without the part he suggests....discuss this with your engine builder...ONE other thing to look for ...the plastic wheel for the bellows wire pull...has a bolt into the crankcase., you will need to install an appropiately small, bolt with sealant to seal this HOLE., when you decide to toss the flapper junk...The small openings (for the flapper ends which protrude thru the sheetmetal)...can be rubber plugged, sealed with a small bolt and nut, (prior to sheetmetal installation)...or left open-do nothing...it,s all good.

.............If you can believe the FACT that the sheetmetal is pressurised, (by the fan), any concern that the oil cooler will not work is unfounded. I have built enough of these engines without flaps and bottom cylinder deflectors to know it all works just fine-BUT all the engines were carburated, and therefore produced more h.p. than a stock engine.....it,s possable, i suppose, that a F.I. engine, in the depths of winter could run too cold. This would be true ALSO with any UPRIGHT fan engine, no matter whose type or design you might have.(because they too do not have "flappers and oil cooler diverters.)....practically speaking F.I. o.e.m. engines are limited severly in camshaft duration and lift due to the design of O.E.M. system.(In stock form). By virtue of using carburators, and a higher duration/lift camshaft--to achieve more H.P. at a higher rpm range, the engine will have more btu,s of heat which must be disapated/removed for engine durability and longetively.my suggestions are based on experience. Additionally for a historic perspective-back in the day of formula super-vee which used the type IV engine. those cars had no fan at all, just air-flow from air scoops, used fabricated fiberglass cylinder covers-no flappers, no oil cooler diverters,no bottom cylinder deflectors....and reved to 8500 rpms, producing more than 165 h.p.with carburators.(solex 40p11)...the engines were good for the entire racing season.The O.E.M. cast fan is efficient, and will cool off the engine just fine.(and provides a counterbalance for the flywheel, and P.P. at the centerline of the crankshaft.). it,s a good system and with a few minor tweeks is even better for engines with higher than stock H.P.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ChrisFoley
post Jun 21 2010, 09:41 AM
Post #32


I am Tangerine Racing
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,926
Joined: 29-January 03
From: Bolton, CT
Member No.: 209
Region Association: None



QUOTE(ME733 @ Jun 21 2010, 09:07 AM) *

The O.E.M. cast fan is efficient, and will cool off the engine just fine.

That's true up to a point, however the inability to increase fan rpm relative to crankshaft rpm means it is impossible to increase the cooling ability of the stock system beyond merely freeing up the airflow through the system.

There is another shortcoming of the stock system. The oil cooler always sees about the same airflow even when the oil is not up to temperature, since the thermostat is not there to preheat the oil.
My latest improvement to the Tangerine Horizontal Cooling System incorporates a simple thermally actuated valve designed to allow airflow through the stock cooler only after reaching operating temperature.
Here's a pic of the prototype which will be operational in a few days.

Attached Image
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
avidfanjpl
post Jun 21 2010, 10:00 AM
Post #33


914 Hemophiliac
***

Group: Members
Posts: 720
Joined: 6-April 10
From: Bear, Delaware
Member No.: 11,566
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



I can confirm that running without the flaps operating on a 2.0L with Djet is bad in cold weather. Like ME733 said, maybe it is not so good.

My engine was rebuilt in 1978 with all the right parts but we did not hook up the bellows wire. Even with the car running warm enough it was easy to tell that it was running too cool. Would not accelerate right on cool days, and ran damn poor on cold days.

Changing the oil found enough bits from the main bearings to know that the car was being damaged from the constant NJ winter.

Sold the car, told the new owner to tear it down, but he wrapped it around a telephone guide wire in a bad turn even on a dry day within a week. Car was junked in 79, and no I do not have the VIN.

So much for not having the flaps working.

J
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Root_Werks
post Jun 21 2010, 10:27 AM
Post #34


Village Idiot
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,321
Joined: 25-May 04
From: About 5NM from Canada
Member No.: 2,105
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



QUOTE(Cevan @ Jun 17 2010, 01:19 PM) *

QUOTE(Root_Werks @ Jun 17 2010, 03:49 PM) *

I noticed this morning the engine was running "cool" on the temp gauge. Popped the lid when I got to work, yup the little cable worked loose. Gotta fix it.

Had that not happened to me this morning, I'm pretty sure I wouldn't have bothered posting to this thread. This has been hashed out so many times I've tossed my arms up in the air to it. People will do what they want anyway.

BTW - with my 914 running cooler and having carbs, it pretty much ran like poo the whole way to work. Never really warmed up to what I have things tuned to. FI will most likely compensate for the cooler running, but carbs generally don't.


Assuming your cooling flaps are installed correctly with the springs in place, if the cable came loose from the pinch bolt (or if the cable broke), the flaps would spring open to the "warmed up" position. Assuming your drive to work was at least 15 minutes, the engine oil should have come up to operating tempurature by then.

I think you may have a different problem, maybe with your carbs. I have my cooling flaps installed and connected to the thermostat. My engine running dual carbs runs fine right out of the gate and continues to run great after the oil is fully warmed up.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but the heads and the combustion chamber come up to temps pretty damn quick, like in a manner of minutes. Not sure how oil temps make the engine run like poo.


10.2 miles to work, as Zach also mentioned, heads temps can change quickly with load of the engine.

FI has a couple of sensors that allow the fuel ratio to be altered slightly to compensate for an engine running a little cooler than "normal". Carbs just can't do that.

"poo" refers to many stinky things, but in this case, just a little hesitation in the lower RPM's was all. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)

Alright, I'm done with this thread, promise this time. I'm too much of a dumb-ass to trust anything other than what the factory did for cooling. Best wishes to the rest of you who want to modify it, I'll stick with stock. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/beerchug.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
DanT
post Jun 21 2010, 11:33 AM
Post #35


Going back to the Dark Side!
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,300
Joined: 4-October 04
From: Auburn, CA
Member No.: 2,880
Region Association: None



I love this topic every time it comes up

kind of like 4vs6 (IMG:style_emoticons/default/popcorn[1].gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ME733
post Jun 21 2010, 12:42 PM
Post #36


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 842
Joined: 25-June 08
From: Atlanta Ga.
Member No.: 9,209
Region Association: South East States



QUOTE(Racer Chris @ Jun 21 2010, 11:41 AM) *

QUOTE(ME733 @ Jun 21 2010, 09:07 AM) *

The O.E.M. cast fan is efficient, and will cool off the engine just fine.

That's true up to a point, however the inability to increase fan rpm relative to crankshaft rpm means it is impossible to increase the cooling ability of the stock system beyond merely freeing up the airflow through the system.

There is another shortcoming of the stock system. The oil cooler always sees about the same airflow even when the oil is not up to temperature, since the thermostat is not there to preheat the oil.
My latest improvement to the Tangerine Horizontal Cooling System incorporates a simple thermally actuated valve designed to allow airflow through the stock cooler only after reaching operating temperature.
Here's a pic of the prototype which will be operational in a few days.

Attached Image

...............Chris....your going to get that damn flat-fan perfected to the point I,m not going to be able to live without it.(short-story) had a buddy with a flat-fan , carrera engine,550 spyder.(rare engine)...displacement was 1750. son-of a -bitch ran like a scalded dog..The flat fan of that engine just had a very special look., and...So does yours.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
brandomc
post Jun 21 2010, 05:48 PM
Post #37


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 113
Joined: 14-May 09
From: los angeles california
Member No.: 10,363
Region Association: Southern California



Thanks guys. Im going to leave the system on the engine without the thermostat hooked up for right now. I live in LA, so i need to keep this engine cool. The car will also be in Bakersfield "devils armpit" alot, so it will be seeing 112 degree days.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
McMark
post Jun 21 2010, 07:05 PM
Post #38


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 20,179
Joined: 13-March 03
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Member No.: 419
Region Association: None



(IMG:style_emoticons/default/thumb3d.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
RiqueMar
post Jun 21 2010, 08:34 PM
Post #39


Enrique Allen Mar
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,169
Joined: 28-August 08
From: San Diego, CA
Member No.: 9,478
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE(Jeff Bowlsby @ Jun 17 2010, 12:31 PM) *

Fixed my photos descriptions above. These OK now? I got these photos somewhere, apparently the descriptions were wrong there too.



Those would be mine.....

brandomc, I did the same thing, as it never really get too cold here.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mtc911
post Jun 13 2019, 06:02 PM
Post #40


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 65
Joined: 18-March 18
From: Atlanta
Member No.: 21,978
Region Association: South East States



This is a great thread - learned a lot. Inspecting mine it looks like the thermostat is gone - I think I know the answer but I’ll ask anyway - can this be our back together w/engine in car or does it need to come out?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

3 Pages V < 1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th May 2024 - 12:21 PM