Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> OT welding question on a different "NARP" -, butt weld or simple patch?
Scott S
post Jul 15 2010, 11:53 AM
Post #1


Small Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,697
Joined: 30-April 03
From: Colorado
Member No.: 633



Hi All
Bought a speedster replica and I have to replace the muffler (it was hit on something, dented, and the seams were split). found the same one to replace it with, but found out the builder of the car modified the original (moved the tail pipe). I need to do the same modification to the replacement muffler. After I cut the tail pipe off, should I butt weld in the patch, or can I simply go with a bigger patch and cover the hole? Does the air pressure in the cannister make a difference on which method is used? I am a bit concerned about potential leaks if I butt weld and have a pin hole that I cant see.

The modification is not visible once the muffler is installed.

Thanks!
Scott S
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies(1 - 4)
Spoke
post Jul 15 2010, 12:28 PM
Post #2


Jerry
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 6,978
Joined: 29-October 04
From: Allentown, PA
Member No.: 3,031
Region Association: None



I usually only butt weld when I'm doing body work. For frame restos and muffler repair overlap is ok.
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ldsgeek
post Jul 15 2010, 12:30 PM
Post #3


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 155
Joined: 27-June 10
From: New Hampshire
Member No.: 11,885
Region Association: None



It may also depend on the state inspection regs. Here in New Hampshire a patched muffler is not acceptable. If you are allowed to patch where you are than either method will hold the pressure, with the larger patch being easier to install properly. Good luck.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
IronHillRestorations
post Jul 15 2010, 01:49 PM
Post #4


I. I. R. C.
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 6,719
Joined: 18-March 03
From: West TN
Member No.: 439
Region Association: None



Doing a proper butt weld on a muffler is very difficult. If you can flange the area around the patch, you can hide it better. If you can't see it, then I wouldn't bother trying to flange it.

I've got a vice grip style flanger as well as a pneumatic flanger/hole punch. PM me if you need and help/advice Scott.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Scott S
post Jul 15 2010, 02:37 PM
Post #5


Small Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,697
Joined: 30-April 03
From: Colorado
Member No.: 633



Thanks a million for the help/opinions. These patches will not be visible once installed, so getting the car through the initial inspection should be no more difficult than it already will be (being a replica and all).

Here is a pic of the existing look. The only difference in the new one will be ditching the stainless tip - it will just be raw steel painted with the correct white/grey muffler paint.

Now I have to figure out how to relocate the ebrake and get the wiper arms chromed. It has been fun working on this car. it is super clean - only has 800 miles since it was built in 2008.

Thanks again -
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/beerchug.gif)


Attached image(s)
Attached Image Attached Image Attached Image Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 18th May 2024 - 07:34 AM