Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Webcam valve lash, Different than stock spec?
jeffdon
post Sep 25 2010, 12:06 PM
Post #1


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,094
Joined: 24-October 06
From: oakland, ca
Member No.: 7,087
Region Association: None



Asked this before, but did not get a solid answer. HAve put a couple hundred miles on my 2056, and am diving in (under) to check the valve clearance. My web cam 494 cam card says to set lash to .006 on intake and exhaust. Stock spec is .006 on intake and .008 on the exhaust. I am running stock pushrods. Which setting should i go for?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
VaccaRabite
post Sep 25 2010, 07:28 PM
Post #2


En Garde!
**********

Group: Admin
Posts: 13,445
Joined: 15-December 03
From: Dallastown, PA
Member No.: 1,435
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



If it were me I would follow the cam card. But I don't think you can use stock rods with the 494 cam. You need to do your valve geometry and use cut to length pushrods to actually get the most out of the cam, and increase the life of your engine.

Zach
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jake Raby
post Sep 25 2010, 07:50 PM
Post #3


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,394
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



Pushrod material dictates valve lash, nothing else impacts it as much.
The 494 has a fast ramp, that cam is very particular to valvetrain geometry.

BTW- Web does not build engines, their lash recommendations don't even mention or consider pushrod material as they are generic to all engines.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jaxdream
post Sep 26 2010, 07:59 AM
Post #4


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 974
Joined: 8-July 08
From: North Central Tennessee
Member No.: 9,270
Region Association: South East States



QUOTE(Jake Raby @ Sep 25 2010, 05:50 PM) *

Pushrod material dictates valve lash, nothing else impacts it as much.
The 494 has a fast ramp, that cam is very particular to valvetrain geometry.

BTW- Web does not build engines, their lash recommendations don't even mention or consider pushrod material as they are generic to all engines.


Is there an optimum pushrod compositon ??? Or is it that some engine / cam combos require steel and others require aluminium / alloy ??? I understand that some material will " grow " more than others but isn't there a common heat range for all the engines , or is it that some engines will run better in different heat ranges ( + / - ) than others ??? Jake you have done this data thing for a long while , maybe you can shed some light on this aspect ( heat range ) . (IMG:style_emoticons/default/idea.gif)

Jack / Jaxdream
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
JFJ914
post Sep 26 2010, 08:31 AM
Post #5


Senior Member
***

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 813
Joined: 13-June 03
From: Alpharetta, GA
Member No.: 814
Region Association: South East States



Any time you play with the engine and make changes, you probably change the valve train geometry. This requires a different length pushrod to optimize it. Although back in the aircooled Super Vee days the rules required the stock pushrods and they could be shortened on a lathe with much trouble, Jake as the engine designer chose to use the chro-moly rods. Your engine, your selection. Regardless, this engine in question probably has incorrect geometry.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jake Raby
post Sep 26 2010, 03:32 PM
Post #6


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,394
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



Stock pushrods are plenty strong, but they are very difficult to use with most cams due to their length that isn't easily adjustable.

I use our chromloly pushrods in all our builds and run zero valve lash with this arrangement.. We never have an issue until someone doesn't listen to our mandates and sets the valves by a book..

EVERY ENGINE requires the valve train geometry to be chacked as 11 variables effect the pushrod length and today with engines and parts being 35 years old+ most engines will see at least 5 of these varialbes applied..
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ME733
post Sep 26 2010, 04:35 PM
Post #7


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 842
Joined: 25-June 08
From: Atlanta Ga.
Member No.: 9,209
Region Association: South East States



JEFFDON... TO answer your original question, use .oo6ths intake and .008ths exhaust......the reason for the difference is that the exhaust valve will (grow) actually get longer due to exhaust temperature.....008ths valve lash will ensure you HAVE valve lash when the engine is very hot.....with aluminum pushrods.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jake Raby
post Sep 26 2010, 04:46 PM
Post #8


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,394
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



We still don't know what pushrod material he is using.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
RJMII
post Sep 26 2010, 05:06 PM
Post #9


Jim McIntosh
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,125
Joined: 11-September 07
From: Sandy, Utah
Member No.: 8,112
Region Association: None



Original post:

QUOTE
I am running stock pushrods.


QUOTE
We still don't know what pushrod material he is using.



Aren't stock pushrods aluminum?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jake Raby
post Sep 26 2010, 05:08 PM
Post #10


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,394
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



Oops, I guess I had two threads confused!

That said, I run .006 on both intake and exhaust with stock pushrods, but thats just me..
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
RJMII
post Sep 26 2010, 05:10 PM
Post #11


Jim McIntosh
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,125
Joined: 11-September 07
From: Sandy, Utah
Member No.: 8,112
Region Association: None



QUOTE
Oops, I guess I had two threads confused!



Easy to do around here. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) Thanks for the info!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jeffdon
post Sep 26 2010, 10:04 PM
Post #12


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,094
Joined: 24-October 06
From: oakland, ca
Member No.: 7,087
Region Association: None



QUOTE(Jake Raby @ Sep 26 2010, 04:08 PM) *

Oops, I guess I had two threads confused!

That said, I run .006 on both intake and exhaust with stock pushrods, but thats just me..



You know/ I went through the valves at .006 each, and then did a hard look at my carb synch, and it ran better still.....did some twisties in the hills, and it pulled a bit harder, and there was much less down shift/down hill popping.

My new mallory dizzy should come in a few days, and I am stoked about that.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th May 2024 - 06:51 PM